AI Therapist Chatbot Experience and Trust Survey
Measures how people actually use an AI therapist chatbot, how helpful and trustworthy they find it, and whether it has ever felt unsafe or judgmental — for product and clinical safety teams. The AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific real conversation instead of relying on vague satisfaction ratings.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 30 days, how often have you used this chatbot?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times this past month
- This is my first time using it
What do you typically use the chatbot for? Select all that apply.
- General stress relief
- Managing anxiety
- Coping with depression or low mood
- Working through a specific problem or decision
- Loneliness or wanting someone to talk to
- Filling the gap between human therapy sessions
- Crisis or urgent emotional support
- Just curious or testing it out
How much do you agree with each statement about your experience with the chatbot?
- It understood what I was trying to say
- I felt judged by its responses
- I trust its suggestions almost as much as advice from a person
- I feel comfortable sharing sensitive or embarrassing topics with it
- I would recommend it to someone who is struggling emotionally
Overall, how helpful has (Replace with your chatbot's name) been in helping you cope with what you're going through?
Which of these matter most to you when you choose to talk to the chatbot instead of a person?
- Available 24/7
- No cost or low cost
- Anonymity and privacy
- Non-judgmental tone
- Immediate response, no waiting
- Personalized suggestions
- No appointment or waiting list needed
- Feels like talking to a real therapist
Has the chatbot ever given you a response that felt unsafe, inappropriate, or unhelpful for what you were going through?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
How likely are you to recommend this chatbot to someone else facing similar struggles?
If the respondent flagged a response that felt unsafe, inappropriate, or unhelpful, reconstruct exactly what they typed, what the chatbot said back, and what they did next — ignored it, sought a human, kept using the app, or stopped. If they didn't flag one, probe the single most meaningful conversation they've had with the chatbot: what they were going through, what it said that landed or fell flat, and what a human therapist might have done differently in that same moment. Push past generic 'it helped' or 'it's fine' answers for concrete detail.
If a human therapist were just as affordable and available as this chatbot, what would you do?
- Switch to a human therapist
- Keep using the chatbot instead
- Use both
- Not sure
What's your relationship to human therapy right now?
- Currently seeing a human therapist
- Have seen one in the past, but not currently
- Never seen a human therapist
- Prefer not to say
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for sharing this with us — especially anything that felt uncomfortable to admit. Your answers will be used to make the chatbot safer and more genuinely helpful, and any flagged safety concerns will be reviewed by our clinical team.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Reconstructs a specific real conversation the respondent had with the chatbot via an AI follow-up interview, rather than asking them to rate 'satisfaction' in the abstract
- Directly asks whether the chatbot ever felt unsafe, inappropriate, or judgmental, and routes flagged respondents into a deeper AI-driven follow-up on that exact incident — built for clinical safety review, not just product feedback
- Combines usage frequency, use-case selection, a matrix of trust/agreement statements, and a max-diff on why people choose the bot over a human, giving product and clinical teams multiple angles in one instrument
- Closes with context on the respondent's relationship to human therapy, so 'would you recommend this over a therapist' answers can be interpreted correctly
SurveySparrow
Therapist Chatbot | Template for CounsellorsThis is a static, fielding-ready survey template aimed at counsellors gathering feedback on a therapist chatbot, so it's a genuine topical match. It appears built around fixed question sets rather than reconstructing individual conversations, and is framed more generally for counsellor use than specifically for product/clinical safety teams flagging unsafe responses.
What it does well
- Purpose-built specifically for therapist chatbot feedback, giving it direct topical relevance
- Framed for counsellors, suggesting language and question framing suited to a therapeutic context
- Likely quick to deploy given SurveySparrow's template-driven form builder
Where it falls short
- No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents who flag an unsafe or unhelpful moment likely can't be probed further on that specific exchange
- No visible mechanism for reconstructing what actually happened in a specific conversation, relying instead on standard rating-style questions
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how any AI-assisted elements (if present) generate or score responses
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.