All templates

Teacher Engagement & Retention Pulse Survey

Measures how engaged, supported, and likely to stay teachers feel — covering workload, recognition, resources, and leadership support — for school and district leaders tracking staff morale. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific reasons behind each teacher's engagement score and their top priority for improvement, surfacing detail no rating scale alone can capture.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

14 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share how things are going at school. Your honest answers help leadership understand what's working and what needs to change — this takes about 8 minutes and your responses matter.

Q02
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend this school as a place to work to another educator?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q03
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree with each statement about your day-to-day experience at school?

6 rows × 5 columns
  • I feel recognized for the work I do
  • My workload is manageable
  • I have the materials and resources I need to teach effectively
  • My input is considered in decisions that affect my classroom
  • I have real opportunities to grow professionally here
  • +1 more
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired

In the last 30 days, how often did you feel emotionally exhausted by your work by the end of the school day?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Every day
Q05
Multiple Choice

In the last 30 days, how often did a supervisor or school leader acknowledge or recognize your work?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more
Q06
Rating ScaleRequired

How supported do you feel by school leadership when you raise a classroom or workload concern?

Range: 15
Min:Very unsupportedMax:Very supported
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Which of these would do the most — and least — to improve your engagement at work?

  • Higher pay or stipends
  • Smaller class sizes
  • More protected planning time
  • More recognition from leadership
  • Better classroom resources and materials
  • More say in school decisions
  • More relevant professional development
  • Less administrative paperwork
Pick best & worst per setBest:Would improve my engagement the mostWorst:Would improve my engagement the least
Q08
AI Interview

Anchor on the respondent's likelihood-to-recommend score and their top-ranked engagement driver from the trade-off question. Probe the specific incident or pattern behind that score — what's a recent moment that made them feel valued or unsupported — and ask what one change from their top driver would concretely look like in their day-to-day role. If their score is high, ask what would put it at risk; if their score is low, ask what it would take to move it up even two points.

Q09
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How likely are you to still be teaching at this school one year from now?

  • Definitely not
  • Probably not
  • Not sure yet
  • Probably yes
  • Definitely yes
Q10
Message

A few quick questions about your role — these help us compare results across grade levels and experience, and are completely optional.

Q11
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role?

  • Classroom teacher
  • Instructional support / paraprofessional
  • Specialist (e.g., counselor, librarian, coach)
  • Other
Q12
Multiple Choice

How many years have you worked in education?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • 8-15 years
  • 16+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Multiple Choice

What grade level(s) do you primarily work with?

  • Elementary
  • Middle school
  • High school
  • Multiple levels / district-wide
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
Message

That's everything — thank you for your honesty. Your answers feed directly into a report school leadership will use to address workload, recognition, and support this year.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Pairs quantitative measures (recommend-to-work likelihood, agreement matrix, burnout and recognition frequency, leadership support rating, one-year retention intent) with an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each teacher's own likelihood-to-recommend score and top-ranked priority to dig into the specific 'why' behind it
  • Uses a MaxDiff exercise to force-rank which improvements would most and least move engagement, giving leaders a prioritized action list rather than just averages
  • Collects role, years in education, and grade level so results can be compared across cohorts, all wrapped in a conversational chat-style flow with clear opening and closing messages
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean district and school leaders get a synthesized summary instead of raw spreadsheet exports

Jotform

Teacher Engagement Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering core teacher engagement topics, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and embed but relies entirely on fixed questions with no adaptive probing. Good for quick deployment, less suited to uncovering the reasoning behind scores.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately
  • Flexible form builder for adding/removing questions and branding
  • Familiar, low-friction form format for respondents

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the 'why' behind each score
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesis
  • No voice interview option for richer qualitative capture

QuestionPro

Teacher Engagement Survey Template + Sample Questionnaire Template

An enterprise survey platform's teacher engagement template with sample questions and presumably strong analytics/dashboarding for large districts. It's a static questionnaire template rather than an interactive interview, so depth comes from fixed question design rather than dynamic probing. Likely well-suited to organizations already on QuestionPro's broader research suite.

What it does well

  • Backed by an established enterprise survey/research platform
  • Sample questionnaire gives a ready starting structure
  • Likely strong reporting/dashboard tooling for large-scale rollouts

Where it falls short

  • Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore individual reasons behind scores
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No transparent, inspectable AI prompts since there's no AI interview layer

SurveySparrow

Teacher Engagement Survey Template

A conversational-style survey template purpose-built for teacher engagement, which aligns well with QuestionPunk's chat-based format. It likely offers a pleasant respondent experience but remains a fixed-question flow rather than a true adaptive interview. No indication of AI-driven follow-up or automated qualitative analysis.

What it does well

  • Conversational, chat-like survey UI improves completion experience
  • Template specifically designed for teacher engagement, not generic HR use
  • Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting features

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interview that follows up on individual responses
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended answers
  • No auto-generated synthesis report or voice interview option

SurveyMonkey

Employee Engagement Survey Template

A general employee engagement template from a widely used survey platform, not specifically written for K-12 teachers or school leadership contexts. It would need adaptation (workload, recognition, classroom-specific language) to fit a teacher retention use case. Strong for broad benchmarking but generic rather than education-tailored.

What it does well

  • Backed by a well-known, broadly trusted survey platform
  • Likely offers benchmarking data across many industries
  • Simple to deploy and customize for general engagement tracking

Where it falls short

  • Not education-specific — lacks teacher/classroom-specific workload and leadership-support framing
  • Static questionnaire with no adaptive AI follow-up interview
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report tailored to school retention

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.