All templates

Contactless Health Screening Experience at Expo Events

Captures how attendees, exhibitors, and staff actually experienced contactless health screening (temperature scans, symptom check-ins, digital health passes) at entry points of an expo or conference. Built for event organizers and venue health & safety teams, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment screening felt slow, confusing, or untrustworthy rather than just a satisfaction score.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for stopping by! We'd like to hear about your experience going through health screening to enter the expo. This takes about 7 minutes and helps us make entry faster and less stressful next time.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Which of the following did you go through to enter the expo? Select all that apply.

  • Contactless temperature scan
  • QR code health declaration or symptom questionnaire
  • Digital vaccine/health status verification
  • Staff visual check or verbal questions
  • None of these
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

How would you rate the speed of the screening process compared to what you expected?

Scale: 15
Min:Much slower than expectedMax:Much faster than expected
Q04
Rating ScaleRequired

How easy was it to understand what you needed to do at the screening station?

Range: 15
Min:Very confusingMax:Very clear
Q05
MatrixRequired

Thinking about your screening experience, how much do you agree with each statement?

4 rows × 5 columns
  • I trusted the screening result was accurate
  • Staff were available and helpful if something went wrong
  • I felt my health information was handled with privacy
  • The queue and spacing at the station felt safe
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
Multiple Choice

Did you run into any of the following problems during screening?

  • Device or scanner malfunctioned
  • Got flagged incorrectly and had to re-check
  • Instructions were unclear
  • Queue was too long
  • Not sure what happened to my health data afterward
Q07
Opinion ScaleRequired

How much do you trust that the screening technology used correctly identified who should or shouldn't enter?

Scale: 17
Min:Do not trust it at allMax:Trust it completely
Q08
AI Interview

Reconstruct the respondent's actual screening moment step by step: what station or device they went through, what happened, and whether it went smoothly. If they flagged a problem (malfunction, false flag, unclear instructions, privacy worry, or trust score below 5), probe exactly what happened, how staff responded, and what would have made them feel safe and confident in the result. If everything went smoothly, ask what almost went wrong or could break down at a busier time slot.

Q09
Opinion ScaleRequired

Based on how health screening was handled, how likely are you to attend another event at this venue?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q10
Long Text

What is one thing the organizers should change about the health screening process before the next expo?

Q11
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role at this expo?

  • Attendee/visitor
  • Exhibitor or vendor staff
  • Event/venue staff
  • Speaker or presenter
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 18
  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

That's everything — thank you for the feedback! Your responses go directly to the event health & safety team to speed up and simplify screening at future expos.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Opens with a chat-style welcome and closes with a chat-style thank-you, framing the survey as a conversation rather than a cold form
  • Combines structured questions (multiple choice on screening steps, opinion scales on speed and trust, a matrix on agreement statements, a rating on clarity) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the respondent's actual screening moment step by step
  • Asks directly about trust in the screening technology and likelihood to return, then lets the AI dig into the specific moment things felt slow, confusing, or untrustworthy instead of stopping at a satisfaction score
  • Segments by role (attendee, exhibitor, staff) and age range so organizers can see whether problems cluster around a particular group, backed by an auto-generated report

QuestionPro

Contactless Health-Screening Survey Template For an Expo

This is a direct topical match — a ready-to-field template built specifically for expo contactless health screening. It likely covers similar ground (temperature checks, symptom questions, satisfaction) but as a static questionnaire. No indication it adapts questions based on a respondent's specific answer.

What it does well

  • Purpose-built for the exact expo/contactless screening use case, so questions are pre-aligned to the scenario
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad question-type and distribution options
  • Likely fielding-ready out of the box for organizers who just need a standard checklist-style survey

Where it falls short

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the exact moment screening felt slow or untrustworthy
  • No transparent, inspectable prompt logic — respondents just answer static items
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or voice-based interview option

Jotform

COVID-19 Daily Health Screening Form Template

This is a daily symptom/temperature check-in form (e.g., for workplaces or schools) rather than an expo-experience survey, so it's a comparable health-screening artifact but not built around the attendee/exhibitor/staff expo journey. It's a fielding-ready form, not a research instrument probing screening quality.

What it does well

  • Simple, fast form-builder experience good for daily operational check-ins
  • Familiar Jotform ecosystem for form logic, notifications, and integrations
  • Easy to customize fields for basic symptom/temperature logging

Where it falls short

  • Designed as a recurring intake form, not an experience-quality survey — no questions on trust, ease of understanding, or likelihood to return
  • No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a specific screening moment
  • No built-in analysis, quality scoring, or auto-generated report on screening experience

SurveyMonkey

Health Check-in Survey Template

A general-purpose health check-in template, likely aimed at workplaces or general wellness check-ins rather than expo entry-point screening specifically. Useful as a generic starting point but not tailored to the attendee/exhibitor/staff expo screening journey.

What it does well

  • Backed by a well-known survey platform with strong distribution and reporting tools
  • Flexible enough to be adapted to various health check-in contexts
  • Quick to deploy for teams already using SurveyMonkey

Where it falls short

  • Not expo-specific — lacks role segmentation (attendee/exhibitor/staff) or entry-point screening detail
  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up into a specific screening moment
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of open responses

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.