Employee MFA Friction & Recovery Assessment
Measures employee friction with multi-factor authentication prompts, backup method clarity, and step-up authentication impact to guide security UX improvements and reduce authentication-related workflow disruptions.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
On a typical workday in the past 7 days, approximately how many MFA prompts did you complete?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–15
- More than 15
How clear are your backup sign-in options if your primary MFA device is unavailable?
How clearly can you tell which actions will trigger step-up authentication before you begin them?
Please rank the following improvements by how much they would reduce MFA fatigue for you. Drag to reorder; top = highest priority.
- Fewer prompts on trusted devices
- Clearer explanation of why a prompt occurs
- Shorter or faster prompt (e.g., biometric or one-tap)
- Longer session duration before re-prompt
- Better offline or travel fallback
- More consistent experience across apps and services
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your MFA, backup sign-in, or step-up authentication experience?
What is your primary department or function?
- Engineering / Development
- IT / Operations / SRE
- Security / Compliance
- Product / Design
- Finance / Accounting
- HR / People
- Sales / Marketing
- Customer Support / Services
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time and insights. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our authentication experience. If you have any questions, please contact [security-ux@company.com].
How disruptive were MFA prompts to your workflow in the past 7 days?
Which fallback or recovery methods have you used in the past 12 months, if any? Select all that apply.
- Backup codes
- SMS text code
- Phone call code
- Security key (e.g., YubiKey)
- Authenticator app on a secondary device
- Helpdesk-assisted temporary access
- Recovery email link
- Other (please specify)
- None — I have not needed a fallback method
How clear is it why step-up authentication is required when it occurs (e.g., accessing sensitive data, logging in from a new location)?
Thank you for your answers so far. We'd like to explore a couple of your experiences in a bit more depth. Please share as much or as little detail as you'd like.
Which best describes your role level?
- Individual contributor
- People manager
- Executive / Senior leadership
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how satisfied are you with the current MFA sign-in experience?
If you lost your primary MFA device today, how confident are you that you could regain access to your accounts within 10 minutes?
When step-up authentication occurs, how disruptive is it to completing your task?
How long have you worked at the company?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- More than 10 years
- Prefer not to say
In which of the following situations have you encountered an MFA prompt in the past 30 days? Select all that apply.
- Signing into email or productivity apps
- Connecting to VPN or remote desktop
- Accessing sensitive data or admin tools
- Logging in from a new device or location
- Returning after a session timeout
- Performing a financial or compliance-related action
- Other (please specify)
- I don't recall / Not sure
The situations that trigger step-up authentication feel appropriate for the level of risk involved.
What is your primary work arrangement?
- Onsite
- Hybrid
- Remote
- Prefer not to say
In the past 30 days, which of the following, if any, have you done in response to MFA prompts? Select all that apply.
- Delayed responding to MFA until a break
- Approved a prompt without reading all details
- Declined a prompt that looked unfamiliar
- Waited for a push instead of entering a code
- Used a trusted device to reduce extra steps
- Contacted support for assistance (e.g., reset or temporary access)
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
Which region do you primarily work in?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions on MFA prompt disruption, backup method clarity, and step-up authentication appropriateness, not just generic satisfaction ratings
- Uses an AI follow-up interview stage to probe respondents' specific friction experiences after the structured questions, adding qualitative depth static forms can't capture
- Includes a ranking question on which improvements would most reduce MFA fatigue, giving prioritized, actionable UX guidance rather than isolated ratings
- Captures role, tenure, department, and work arrangement as segmentation variables so security UX teams can see which populations experience the most authentication friction
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Checkout Fraud-Prevention vs. Conversion UX Survey
Measures how ecommerce customers perceive and respond to fraud-prevention steps during checkout, identifying the trade-offs between security friction and conversion to guide UX optimization.
View templateE-Signature Workflow UX & Trust Assessment
Evaluates clarity, trust, friction points, and completion outcomes across electronic signature workflows. Designed for UX researchers and product teams seeking to identify and prioritize improvements in their signing experience.
View templateeDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment
Evaluates e-discovery software usability, workflow pain points, and feature priorities across the EDRM lifecycle. Designed for legal professionals, litigation support teams, and legal operations who use e-discovery platforms on active matters.
View templateParticipant Preferences for Anonymized Data Sharing & Licensing
Measures research participants' comfort with anonymized data sharing, preferred licensing models, repository preferences, and required safeguards. Designed for IRB-compliant studies where researchers need informed consent data on secondary data use.
View templateVendor DPA Clarity & Negotiability Assessment
An internal assessment for privacy, legal, and procurement professionals to evaluate the clarity, negotiability, and workflow efficiency of vendor Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), identifying bottlenecks and improvement priorities.
View templateCookie Paywall Fairness & Consent Alternatives Survey
Measures consumer perceptions of fairness, transparency, and trust in cookie paywalls versus privacy-friendly content-access alternatives. Designed for UX researchers, privacy professionals, and publishers seeking GDPR-aligned consent insights.
View template