All templates

Post-Event Attendee Experience Evaluation

Captures how attendees experienced your event — from content and speakers to venue and networking — and uses an AI follow-up interview to uncover the specific moment behind their satisfaction and recommendation scores. Built for event, marketing, and community teams running post-event debriefs.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

12 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for coming to (Replace with event name)! We'd love your honest feedback to make the next one better. This will take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How did you attend (Replace with event name)? (Template note: remove the hybrid option if your event was single-format.)

  • In-person
  • Virtual
  • Hybrid — attended parts of both
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied were you with the event?

Scale: 110
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q04
MatrixRequired

How would you rate each of the following aspects of the event?

6 rows × 5 columns
  • Session or content quality
  • Speaker or presenter quality
  • Venue and facilities
  • Networking opportunities
  • Registration and logistics
  • +1 more
Columns: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend this event to a colleague or peer?

Scale: 010
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q06
Ranking

If we could only improve a few things for next time, rank these from most to least in need of improvement.

  1. Session content and topics
  2. Speaker or presenter quality
  3. Networking time
  4. Venue or location
  5. Registration process
  6. Food and beverage
  7. Schedule pacing
Drag to rank
Q07
AI Interview

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's satisfaction and recommendation scores. If either score was low or middling, pinpoint the specific session, moment, or logistical issue that drove it and what would have changed the score. If the scores were high, find out which single element they'd point to as the reason they'd recommend it and whether that's something the organizers can replicate or scale next time. Anchor follow-ups on whichever matrix item they rated lowest.

Q08
Multiple Choice

Do you plan to attend future editions of this event?

  • Definitely will
  • Probably will
  • Not sure yet
  • Probably won't
  • Definitely won't
Q09
Long Text

What's one thing we should keep exactly the same next time, and one thing we should change?

Q10
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role at this event?

  • Individual contributor / general attendee
  • Manager or team lead
  • Executive or director
  • Student
  • Vendor, sponsor, or exhibitor
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice

How did you first hear about this event?

  • Email invitation
  • Social media
  • Colleague or friend
  • Company or organization announcement
  • Search engine
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Message

That's everything — thank you for the feedback! We'll use your responses, alongside everyone else's, to shape the agenda and logistics for the next event.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasoning behind each attendee's satisfaction and recommendation scores, not just the numbers themselves
  • Combines standard event evaluation metrics (satisfaction, recommendation, matrix ratings of speakers/venue/networking) with a ranking question to prioritize what to fix next time
  • Captures attendee role and discovery channel alongside open-ended 'keep vs. change' feedback for richer segmentation
  • Ends with automated reporting that synthesizes structured ratings and AI-probed qualitative context into one summary for event teams

Typeform

Post-Event Evaluation Form Template

A fielding-ready form template covering standard post-event feedback questions with Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time UI. Good for basic satisfaction capture but relies on fixed question sets rather than adaptive follow-up. No mention of AI-driven probing or automated quality scoring.

What it does well

  • Polished, conversational form-filling experience
  • Ready-to-use template structure for quick deployment
  • Established integrations ecosystem typical of Typeform

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the 'why' behind scores
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published prompt-level methodology for any AI features

Jotform

Create Free Event Evaluation Forms - Event Evaluation Form Templates

This is a template category/library page offering multiple static event evaluation form templates rather than a single fielding-ready survey. Useful as a starting gallery, but each template is a fixed form with no dynamic follow-up capability. Customization is drag-and-drop form building, not adaptive interviewing.

What it does well

  • Wide selection of pre-built event evaluation form variants
  • Drag-and-drop form builder for easy customization
  • Free tier available for basic form creation

Where it falls short

  • Category page, not a single ready-to-field template — requires selecting and configuring a form
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to explore respondent reasoning
  • No automated quality scoring of responses

QuestionPro

Event Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

Primarily a guide-style page presenting sample event evaluation questions and question bank rather than a single deployable survey flow. Helpful for question ideas across speakers, venue, and content, but doesn't ship as a ready-to-send instrument with built-in AI follow-up. Positioned more as reference content than a survey product.

What it does well

  • Broad sample question bank covering many event evaluation angles
  • Established survey platform with analytics and reporting features
  • Guidance on question wording for common event feedback areas

Where it falls short

  • Page reads as a question guide/sample template, not a ready-to-field survey flow
  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up interview to surface the specific moment behind scores
  • No transparent, publishable AI prompt methodology

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.