All templates
Privacy & Compliance

Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey

Measures employee perceptions of phishing simulation realism, behavioral responses, confidence changes, and training preferences to help security teams optimize their awareness programs.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

20 questions · ~9 min
Q01
Message

Welcome! This brief survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with recent phishing simulations at this organization. Your responses are completely confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve security awareness training. Participation is voluntary, you may stop at any time, and there are no right or wrong answers—we simply want your honest opinions. Thank you for your time.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Have you ever received a phishing simulation email from this employer?

  • Yes, at this employer
  • Yes, but only at a previous employer
  • No, never
  • Not sure
Q03
Opinion Scale

Overall, how realistic did the most recent phishing simulation feel?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all realisticMax:Extremely realistic
Q04
Opinion Scale

Before your most recent simulation, how confident were you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q05
Ranking

Please rank the following training formats from most helpful to least helpful.

  1. Interactive phishing simulations
  2. Short videos (≤3 minutes)
  3. Live workshops or webinars
  4. Job aid or one-page checklist
  5. Email tips or newsletters
  6. Microlearning modules (5–10 minutes)
Drag to rank
Q06
AI Interview

Based on your responses in this survey, what suggestions do you have for improving future phishing simulations or related security training? Please share any specifics.

Q07
Dropdown

On a typical workday, approximately how many emails do you handle?

  • 0–24
  • 25–74
  • 75–149
  • 150+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
Message

Thank you for participating! Your feedback will directly help us make phishing simulations and security training more relevant and effective.

Q09
Multiple Choice

When was the most recent phishing simulation you recall receiving from this employer?

  • Within the last 7 days
  • 2–4 weeks ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • More than 3 months ago
  • I don't recall
  • Not applicable—I haven't received one here
Q10
Multiple Choice

Which aspects of the simulation felt realistic? Select all that apply.

  • Sender name and email address
  • Subject line
  • Email body content and tone
  • Visual design and branding
  • Call-to-action (link or attachment)
  • Timing of delivery
  • None of the above
Q11
Opinion Scale

Today, how confident are you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q12
Multiple Choice

How frequently would you prefer to receive phishing simulations?

  • Twice per month
  • Monthly
  • Every 2 months
  • Quarterly
  • Twice per year
  • Once per year
Q13
Dropdown

Which of the following best describes your primary job function?

  • Engineering/IT
  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Human Resources
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Marketing/Communications
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
Multiple Choice

Thinking about your most recent simulation from this employer, what did you do? Select all that apply.

  • Reported it using the reporting tool/process
  • Deleted it without interacting
  • Clicked a link or opened an attachment
  • Replied to the message
  • Ignored it and took no action
  • Asked a colleague or IT for advice
  • Marked it as spam/junk
  • I don't recall
Q15
Opinion Scale

How difficult was it to identify the most recent simulation as a phishing attempt?

Scale: 17
Min:Very easy to identifyMax:Very difficult to identify
Q16
Multiple Choice

What, if anything, did you learn or reinforce from the simulation(s)? Select all that apply.

  • How to use the report button or process
  • How to inspect URLs safely
  • Common red flags to watch for
  • How to verify sender identity
  • To pause and validate urgent requests
  • Where to find internal guidance/resources
  • Nothing new to me
Q17
Dropdown

How long have you worked at this organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
Multiple Choice

Which cues, if any, did you notice in the simulation? Select all that apply.

  • Suspicious sender or domain
  • Generic greeting or unusual salutation
  • Spelling or grammar errors
  • Urgent or threatening language
  • Unexpected attachment
  • Mismatched or odd-looking URL
  • Unusual request for sensitive data
  • Off-brand visuals or layout
  • Timing felt unusual (e.g., outside business hours)
  • I did not notice any specific cues
Q19
Opinion Scale

In the next 30 days, how likely are you to change any of your email habits based on these simulations (e.g., reporting suspicious messages faster, inspecting links more carefully)?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unlikelyMax:Very likely
Q20
Dropdown

In which region are you primarily based?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes respondents on their own suggestions for improving the phishing program, rather than stopping at closed-ended ratings
  • Combines opinion-scale confidence tracking (before vs. today) with multiple-choice behavioral recall questions, so you can measure both perceived and self-reported behavior change from the same simulation event
  • Uses ranking and preference questions (training format ranking, frequency preference) to directly inform program redesign, not just measure satisfaction
  • Ends with auto-generated reporting and transparent prompts, so security teams can see exactly what was asked in the AI portion and trust the resulting summary

SurveySparrow

Post Training Survey Template | Feedback From Employees

This is a general post-training feedback template, not specific to phishing or security awareness, so questions would need heavy customization to fit a phishing simulation use case. It's a ready-to-field form with SurveySparrow's conversational-style UI. There's no built-in mechanism for adaptive probing into why someone clicked or reported a simulated email.

What it does well

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format that can feel less clinical than a standard form
  • Purpose-built for employee training feedback, so core structure (satisfaction, relevance, usefulness) transfers reasonably well

Where it falls short

  • Not phishing-specific out of the box, requiring manual rebuilding of simulation-related questions
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

QuestionPro

Training Effectiveness Survey Questions | Post-Training Evaluation Sample Template

This template targets general training effectiveness evaluation (e.g., Kirkpatrick-style questions) rather than phishing simulations specifically. It's a fielding-ready template within a full-featured survey platform, useful as a starting point but not tailored to security awareness behaviors or cues. Teams would need to add phishing-specific items themselves.

What it does well

  • Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with broad question-type support and analytics
  • Structured around established training-evaluation frameworks, useful for benchmarking general learning outcomes

Where it falls short

  • No phishing simulation-specific content (realism, cues noticed, click/report behavior)
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI interview option — follow-up questions are static and pre-written
  • No transparent, per-question AI prompt disclosure or automated quality scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

Security Awareness Survey Template

This is the most directly comparable template, covering general security awareness rather than phishing simulation specifics like realism, cues noticed, or confidence shift after a simulation. It's a ready-to-use static form backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and reporting tools. It would need supplementing to capture pre/post confidence and training-format preferences in the depth QuestionPunk's template does.

What it does well

  • Well-known, easy-to-deploy platform with strong distribution and basic reporting/dashboards
  • Covers broad security awareness topics that overlap with phishing training programs

Where it falls short

  • Focused on general security awareness, not simulation-specific realism, cues, or behavioral recall
  • Fixed-question static form with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Privacy & Compliance

RBAC Clarity & Access Control Confidence Assessment

Measures how well product administrators understand role-based access control concepts, permission scopes, and inheritance behaviors. Use this to identify confusion points, predictability gaps, and documentation needs that impact governance and security posture.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Passkeys Readiness & Risk Assessment

An internal stakeholder survey to assess organizational readiness for passkeys/passwordless authentication, surface security and UX risks, and align cross-functional teams on rollout priorities.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

On-Device Personalization Trust & Privacy Preferences Survey

Measures user trust, comfort boundaries, and permission preferences for on-device personalization features. Designed for product and privacy teams validating data-handling approaches before launch.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Checkout Fraud-Prevention vs. Conversion UX Survey

Measures how ecommerce customers perceive and respond to fraud-prevention steps during checkout, identifying the trade-offs between security friction and conversion to guide UX optimization.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Data Access Request (DSAR) Experience & Expectations Survey

Measures consumer experiences with data subject access requests and expectations around response timelines, suitable for organizations assessing GDPR/CCPA compliance perceptions and identifying friction points in the DSAR process.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Account Deletion & Data Erasure UX Audit (GDPR/CCPA)

Evaluates the findability, clarity, effort, and trustworthiness of account deletion and data erasure flows. Designed for UX researchers and compliance teams auditing consumer-facing digital services against GDPR/CCPA standards.

View template