LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment
Evaluates laboratory information system usability, data accuracy, and workflow efficiency for biotech and healthcare lab professionals based on recent 30–90 day experience.
Preguntas de ejemplo
Una vista previa del contenido de la plantilla. Todas las preguntas son editables antes de publicar.
Do you directly enter or verify test results in the LIS?
- Yes
- No
Overall, how easy is your primary LIS to use for your daily work?
In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter data entry errors that required correction?
- Never
- Once in the last 30 days
- 2–3 times in the last 30 days
- About weekly
- Several times per week
- Daily or almost daily
Approximately how many total hours of unplanned LIS downtime occurred in the last 90 days?
- 0 (no unplanned downtime)
- Less than 1 hour
- 1–4 hours
- 5–8 hours
- 9–24 hours
- More than 24 hours
- Not sure
How would you rate the training you received on accurate data entry and handling in the LIS?
Please rank the following potential improvements from most important to least important for strengthening LIS usability and data integrity.
- More informative error messages
- Stronger real-time validation rules
- Faster search and filtering
- Clearer audit trail views/exports
- Better downtime and rollback workflows
- Simplified order entry and verification
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about LIS usability or data integrity.
What is your primary role?
- Medical technologist/MLS
- Lab supervisor or manager
- Pathologist
- LIS/IT or integration specialist
- QA/Regulatory
- Phlebotomy/accessioning
- Research scientist
- Other
Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform improvements to LIS usability and data integrity practices. You may now close this window.
Which Laboratory Information System (LIS) do you primarily use?
- Epic Beaker
- Cerner PathNet
- Sunquest
- Orchard Harvest
- SoftLab (SCC)
- LabWare
- Custom or in-house system
- Not sure
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Navigating between LIS modules and screens is straightforward.
In the last 90 days, which data integrity issues have you personally observed? Select all that apply.
- Duplicate patient or sample records
- Mismatched patient ID or demographics
- Specimen mislabeling detected by the system
- Result overwritten or lost
- Incomplete audit trail for a change
- Interface transmission failure or delay
- Reference range or version mismatch
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
During peak hours in the last 30 days, how often did the LIS feel noticeably slow?
- Never
- Once in the last 30 days
- 2–3 times in the last 30 days
- About weekly
- Several times per week
- Daily or almost daily
How satisfied are you with the support you receive (vendor or internal) when you encounter LIS data issues?
We'd like to understand more about your LIS experience. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
What is your primary lab setting?
- Hospital
- Academic medical center
- Independent/reference lab
- Biotech/pharma
- Public health lab
- Clinic/physician office
- Other
How often do you use your primary LIS in your job?
- All day (most hours)
- Several times per day
- About once per day
- A few times per week
- Less often
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Completing routine tasks requires a reasonable number of clicks or steps.
How confident are you that data in your primary LIS are accurate and complete?
How many years of total experience do you have working in laboratory settings?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- 5–10 years
- Over 10 years
How long have you used this primary LIS?
- Less than 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- Over 5 years
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: Error messages clearly help me understand what went wrong and how to fix it.
When needed in the last 90 days, how easy was it to retrieve a complete audit trail?
- Very difficult
- Difficult
- Neither easy nor difficult
- Easy
- Very easy
- Not applicable
What is your primary work shift?
- Day
- Evening
- Night
- Rotating
- Varies/Not applicable
Which systems are currently integrated with your LIS? Select all that apply.
- EHR/EMR
- Analyzer/instrument interfaces
- Middleware/automation
- Billing/finance
- Reference lab interfaces
- Reporting/analytics/BI
- Inventory/supply
- Quality management tools (e.g., CAP/CLIA)
- None of the above
- Not sure
- Other (please specify)
Thinking about the last 30 days, to what extent do you agree: The LIS interface layout is intuitive and well organized.
To what extent do you agree: the LIS validation rules prevent most incorrect or incomplete entries.
Overall, how satisfied are you with the usability of your primary LIS?
In the last 30 days, which LIS tasks were most time-consuming? Select all that apply.
- Order entry
- Specimen accessioning
- Test result entry/verification
- Result corrections/amendments
- Patient or result search
- Quality control documentation
- Worklist management
- Report generation
- Interface troubleshooting
- Other (please specify)
Qué incluye
Seguimientos con IA
Preguntas adaptativas sobre las respuestas abiertas que sacan detalles que un formulario estático pasaría por alto.
Controles de atención
Protecciones integradas frente a respuestas apresuradas y participantes de baja calidad.
Textos redactados por IA
Redacción, orden y ramificaciones escritos por la IA, ajustados a su objetivo de investigación.
Informe automático
Los temas, las citas y un resumen en lenguaje claro se escriben solos en cuanto llegan las respuestas.
Cómo se compara
Revisamos las plantillas más parecidas de otras herramientas de encuestas. Esto es lo que hacen bien, y dónde esta plantilla va más lejos.
Por qué esta plantilla
- Pairs standardized usability agreement statements (navigation, routine task completion, error message clarity, interface satisfaction) with LIS-specific data integrity items like audit trail retrieval, validation rule effectiveness, and unplanned downtime — content generic usability templates don't cover
- Includes an AI follow-up interview so respondents can elaborate on the specific integrity issues or time-consuming tasks they flagged, adding qualitative depth without a separate study
- Captures role, lab setting, years of experience, and shift alongside compliance-relevant questions, letting quality and IT teams segment findings by who is affected and where
- Closes with a ranked improvement-priorities question, open-text reflection, and an auto-generated report, so findings on both usability and data accuracy are ready to act on immediately
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey TemplateA fielding-ready implementation of the standard System Usability Scale (SUS), generic to any software product rather than laboratory systems specifically. Useful if a lab team wants a quick, benchmarked usability score but not built to probe LIS-specific concerns like data integrity, validation rules, or downtime.
Qué hace bien
- Based on the well-established, benchmarked SUS methodology
- Quick to deploy for a general usability snapshot
- Familiar format for teams wanting comparability across tools/products
Dónde se queda corta
- Not tailored to laboratory information systems or data integrity/compliance concerns
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into flagged pain points
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report
SurveySparrow
Laboratory Competency Assessment Form TemplateTargets healthcare lab staff like our template, but focuses on assessing individual competency/skills rather than LIS usability or data integrity. It's a static, conversational-style form, not an adaptive interview, and doesn't address system-level workflow or data quality issues.
Qué hace bien
- Audience-appropriate for laboratory/healthcare professionals
- SurveySparrow's conversational form style may improve completion rates
- Structured for competency/skills evaluation use cases
Dónde se queda corta
- Does not evaluate LIS usability, data accuracy, or workflow efficiency
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview option to explore individual responses
- No published methodology for scoring or transparent prompt logic
Typeform
System Usability Survey TemplateA generic system usability survey with Typeform's polished conversational interface, applicable to any software but not written for laboratory information systems or regulatory data-integrity concerns. It's a fixed-question template rather than an adaptive interview tool.
Qué hace bien
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI that may boost completion
- Simple to adapt wording for different software products
- Easy to launch quickly with minimal setup
Dónde se queda corta
- No LIS-specific or data integrity content (audit trails, validation rules, downtime)
- Static form with no adaptive or voice AI follow-up interviewing
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Qué preguntas incluye la plantilla «LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment»?
La plantilla incluye 30 preguntas listas para usar, empezando por: «Welcome to the LIS Usability & Data Integrity Assessment. This survey asks about your recent experience with your prima…» · «Do you directly enter or verify test results in the LIS?» · «Overall, how easy is your primary LIS to use for your daily work?». El conjunto completo se muestra arriba y todas las preguntas son editables.
¿Cuánto se tarda en completar esta encuesta?
Los participantes suelen terminar las 30 preguntas en unos 13 minutos.
¿Puedo personalizar esta plantilla?
Sí: cada pregunta, cada opción de respuesta y el orden son editables antes de publicar. Puede añadir o quitar preguntas, o pedir al editor con IA que rehaga la encuesta en torno a su objetivo de investigación.
¿Esta plantilla es gratuita?
Sí. Ábrala en el editor y empiece a personalizarla ahora mismo: no necesita cuenta para probarla, y el plan gratuito cubre la publicación de su encuesta.
¿Listo para publicar?
Abra esta plantilla en el editor. Todo es suyo para cambiarlo antes de que lo vea el primer participante.
Plantillas relacionadas
Más estudios sobre temas similares.
Evaluación de Acceso, Experiencia y Resultados de la Teleterapia
Evalúa las barreras de acceso de los pacientes, la comodidad durante las sesiones, los resultados terapéuticos percibidos y las preferencias de formato en la teleterapia. Diseñada para organizaciones de salud y plataformas de telesalud que buscan mejorar la prestación de atención virtual.
Ver plantillaEncuesta sobre la comprensión de resultados de laboratorio en el portal del paciente
Mide cómo los pacientes interpretan, comprenden y responden a los resultados de laboratorio y los rangos de referencia en los portales en línea. Identifica barreras de usabilidad y funciones preferidas para mejorar el diseño del portal y el apoyo a la alfabetización en salud.
Ver plantillaEvaluación de Usabilidad de Herramientas y Flujos de Trabajo Internos
Mide la usabilidad, fiabilidad y eficiencia percibidas por los empleados respecto a las herramientas y flujos de trabajo internos. Utilícela con equipos multifuncionales para identificar puntos de fricción y priorizar mejoras.
Ver plantillaEncuesta de experiencia con el proceso de solicitud de laboratorio
Mide con qué fluidez el personal clínico y de laboratorio puede enviar, dar seguimiento y resolver problemas con las solicitudes de pruebas de laboratorio, abarcando la claridad del formulario, el tiempo de respuesta y las tasas de error. Un seguimiento con IA reconstruye exactamente qué salió mal en una solicitud problemática reciente, en lugar de basarse en quejas vagas, lo que brinda a los equipos de operaciones de laboratorio soluciones concretas para priorizar.
Ver plantillaEvaluación de la Integración con el LMS y la Fiabilidad del SSO para Docentes
Mide la fiabilidad reportada por los docentes, la frecuencia de errores y la satisfacción con las integraciones del LMS y los sistemas de inicio de sesión único (SSO). Utilice este instrumento para identificar puntos de fallo, priorizar correcciones y comparar el rendimiento de las integraciones en ventanas de recuerdo de 30 días.
Ver plantillaEncuesta de satisfacción y mejora para usuarios de la biblioteca
Mide cómo valoran los usuarios la colección, el personal, los espacios y los recursos digitales de la biblioteca, y qué mejoras serían más importantes, con un seguimiento por IA que profundiza en la verdadera razón detrás de su puntuación de satisfacción. Diseñada para bibliotecas públicas y académicas que planifican presupuestos, horarios o renovaciones.
Ver plantilla