Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
Agile Sprint Retrospective Feedback Survey
Captures how a development team felt about the sprint that just ended — goal completion, planning accuracy, collaboration, and workload sustainability — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind blockers and missed goals instead of the sanitized version teams give in stand-up.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
의견 척도필수
Overall, how satisfied are you with how this sprint went?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q03
객관식필수
Did the team complete the sprint goal?
- Yes, fully
- Mostly, with minor gaps
- Partially
- No, we missed it significantly
Q04
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree with each statement about this sprint?
5개 행 × 5개 열
- Sprint planning estimates were realistic
- Blockers were identified and resolved quickly
- Communication within the team was clear
- Work was distributed fairly across the team
- Requirements were clear before we started
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Looking at this sprint, which factors helped progress the most, and which hurt it the most?
- Clear requirements going in
- Daily stand-ups
- Pairing or code review support
- Tooling / CI-CD reliability
- Cross-team dependencies
- Mid-sprint scope changes
- Meeting load
- Documentation quality
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Helped most최악:Hurt most
Q06
평점 척도필수
How sustainable was the pace of work this sprint?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not sustainable, we were stretched thin최대:Very sustainable
Q07
단문형
In one sentence, what was the single biggest blocker this sprint?
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Probe the real story behind this sprint's outcome. If the goal was missed or only partially met, find out at what point it became clear it was at risk and whether that was raised early or discovered late. Anchor on their stated biggest blocker and any low agreement/disagreement ratings from the sprint statements, and ask what would need to change next sprint to prevent the same issue. If they rated the sprint highly across the board, ask what specifically the team should keep doing.
Q09
의견 척도필수
How confident are you in the plan for next sprint?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q10
객관식
What is your role on this team?
- Engineer / Developer
- QA / Test
- Product Manager
- Designer
- Scrum Master / Team Lead
- Other
Q11
객관식
How long have you been on this team?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed directly into the team's retrospective discussion and next sprint's planning.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that probes the real story behind missed or partially completed goals, going beyond the surface-level answer given in stand-up
- Combines structured measurement (opinion scale for satisfaction, rating for pace sustainability, matrix for agreement statements, max diff for what helped vs. hurt progress) with open-ended short text on blockers
- Segments respondents by role and tenure on the team, so retro feedback can be analyzed by context (e.g., new joiners vs. veterans)
- Closes with an automated report generation step so the team retro data feeds directly into a usable summary rather than raw spreadsheet exports
SurveyMonkey
Sprint Retrospective Questions TemplateA ready-to-field template with a preset list of sprint retrospective questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It's a static question set aimed at general survey builders rather than one designed specifically for agile teams' nuanced blocker/goal-completion dynamics. No mention of any conversational or adaptive follow-up capability.
잘하는 점
- Mature, well-known survey platform with broad distribution options
- Built-in analytics and reporting dashboard
- Simple to deploy quickly for teams already using SurveyMonkey
아쉬운 점
- Static question list with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe missed goals or blockers further
- No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
- No published methodology on how questions were validated or scored
Jotform
Agile Retrospective Form TemplateA drag-and-drop form template positioned within Jotform's broader form-builder ecosystem, useful for quickly customizing field types and layout. It reads as a form-building starting point rather than a purpose-built research instrument with scoring or analysis logic. No indication of any AI-driven interviewing or automated quality scoring of responses.
잘하는 점
- Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
- Easy integration with other Jotform workflows and apps
- Free tier available for basic form usage
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to dig past sanitized stand-up answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- Static form fields only, with no follow-up logic tied to specific answers like missed sprint goals
Typeform
Retrospective Survey TemplateA conversational-style, one-question-at-a-time survey template that offers a more engaging respondent experience than a traditional form. However, the flow is still pre-scripted rather than dynamically generated, and the page doesn't indicate any capability to ask context-aware follow-up questions based on a given answer. It's a general retrospective template, not one tailored to sprint-specific concepts like planning accuracy or velocity.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
- Simple template structure that's easy to brand and customize
- Established platform with broad integrations
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI option to probe blockers in depth
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
- No transparent published prompts or methodology behind question design
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
Online Social Networking Habits & Wellbeing Survey
Explores how people actually use social networking platforms — which ones, how much, why, and how it affects their day-to-day wellbeing. Includes a best-worst trade-off on core motivations and a feature-priority ranking, plus an AI follow-up that reconstructs a specific recent moment the respondent almost quit or actually quit a platform, and what changed their mind.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Job Fair Registration & Candidate Interest Survey
Captures what job seekers are looking for before a job fair — target industries, role types, format preferences, and what actually drives them to stop at a booth — with an AI follow-up that surfaces the real career goals and hesitations behind their answers. Built for recruiters and event organizers planning employer lineups and floor layout.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Neighborhood Livability and Community Feedback Survey
Captures how residents really feel about safety, upkeep, amenities, and community spirit where they live, with an AI follow-up that digs into the one issue affecting quality of life most. Built for city planners, HOAs, and community organizations tracking neighborhood health over time.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
펀런 등록 경험 및 가격 설문조사
참가자들이 펀런에 등록한 이유, 온라인 등록 및 결제 과정이 얼마나 매끄러웠는지, 그리고 어떤 참가비가 적정하다고 느끼는지를 파악합니다. 아울러 등록 편의성 평가가 낮은 배경에 있는 구체적인 불편 요소를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문이 포함되어 있습니다. 등록 흐름, 커뮤니케이션, 가격 정책을 개선하려는 대회 주최자와 이벤트 마케터를 위해 제작되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Corporate Crisis Response Perception Survey
Measures how customers, employees, and other stakeholders perceived your company's official response to a recent incident or controversy — its clarity, credibility, and effect on trust — with an AI follow-up that uncovers exactly what shaped their reaction. Built for comms, PR, and exec teams evaluating crisis messaging.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Big Game Day Fan Quiz & Ad Engagement Survey
A fun, quiz-style survey for sports marketers, broadcasters, and brands to gauge fan excitement, viewing habits, and commercial/halftime engagement around the year's biggest televised game. The AI follow-up reconstructs the specific ad or moment a fan actually remembers, not just whether they say ads matter.
템플릿 보기