AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey
Measures how ML/AI practitioners engage with model cards, evaluate documented limitations, and how documentation quality shapes trust and adoption decisions across deployment contexts.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the past 6 months, how have you worked with ML models? Select all that apply.
- Implemented or fine-tuned models in code
- Consumed prebuilt APIs/SDKs
- Evaluated model performance for a project
- Selected vendors or models for deployment
- Wrote or maintained documentation
- None of the above
How familiar are you with model cards?
- Very familiar — I regularly read and apply them
- Somewhat familiar — I've read a few
- I've heard of model cards but I'm not sure what they include
- Not familiar — I've never heard of them
If a model card is available, how likely are you to read it before using the model?
In model cards you've used, how easy was it to locate limitations and failure modes?
When limitations are unclear or missing, what do you typically do? Select all that apply.
- Run targeted tests or benchmarks
- Search issues/forums or community reports
- Contact provider or open a ticket
- Read source paper or repository docs
- Switch to a different model
- Proceed with extra monitoring/guardrails
- Defer or block the integration
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, do you have any suggestions to make model cards clearer or more actionable?
What is your primary role?
- Backend/Full-stack Engineer
- ML/AI Engineer
- Data Scientist/Analyst
- Researcher
- Product Manager
- SRE/DevOps
- Security/Privacy Engineer
- Technical Writer
- Student
- Other
Thank you for your time! Your feedback will help improve how model cards communicate limitations and support better integration decisions.
Based on what you currently know, which information would you expect to find in a model card? Select all that apply.
- Intended use and out-of-scope uses
- Training data sources and collection methods
- Evaluation metrics and methodology
- Performance across subgroups or conditions
- Known limitations and failure modes
- Safety/ethics considerations
- Versioning and change history
- Licensing and usage terms
- Contact/support information
- Deployment requirements and constraints
- I don't know / not sure
- Other (please specify)
From the model cards you've reviewed, which elements were commonly included? Select all that apply.
- Intended use and out-of-scope uses
- Training data sources and collection methods
- Evaluation metrics and methodology
- Performance across subgroups or conditions
- Known limitations and failure modes
- Safety/ethics considerations
- Versioning and change history
- Licensing and usage terms
- Contact/support information
- Deployment requirements and constraints
In general, how easy do you think it would be to find a model's limitations in a typical model card?
Which format would make model limitations most actionable for you?
- One-page summary with key facts
- Table with metrics by subgroup
- Risk checklist with mitigations
- Traffic-light risk labeling
- Interactive examples and failure cases
- Link to detailed paper/appendix
- Other (please specify)
We'd like to explore your experiences with model cards a bit further. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
How many years have you worked professionally with ML/AI (in any capacity)?
- 0–1
- 2–4
- 5–7
- 8–10
- 11+
- Prefer not to say
Quick primer: A model card is a concise report that outlines a model's intended and out-of-scope uses, data provenance, evaluation methods and results (often across subgroups), known limitations and failure modes, and relevant safety/ethical notes. It helps you judge fit and risks before integrating a model. Please keep this definition in mind for the remaining questions.
In the past 3 months, how often did you consult model documentation when integrating models?
- Every integration
- Most integrations
- Sometimes
- Rarely
- Never
- Not applicable — I haven't integrated models recently
How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a safety-critical deployment (e.g., healthcare, autonomous systems)?
Overall, how much do you trust model cards to accurately represent a model's capabilities and limitations?
What is your organization's approximate size (total employees)?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
- Prefer not to say
How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a fairness-sensitive application (e.g., hiring, credit scoring)?
Which region are you primarily based in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a latency-sensitive production system (e.g., real-time inference)?
Which programming languages do you primarily use when working with ML models? Select all that apply.
- Python
- JavaScript/TypeScript
- Java
- C/C++
- Go
- Rust
- R
- Swift/Kotlin
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Have you ever discovered a model limitation that was not documented in its model card?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Which industry best describes your work context?
- Technology
- Finance
- Healthcare
- Retail/E-commerce
- Media/Entertainment
- Education
- Government/Nonprofit
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Please briefly describe the undocumented limitation and how you identified it.
Rank the following limitation factors from most to least important when selecting a model.
- Accuracy on out-of-distribution data
- Biased outcomes for specific subgroups
- Privacy or data leakage risk
- Robustness to adversarial or prompt attacks
- Interpretability/traceability gaps
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
AI Governance & Risk Controls Readiness Assessment
Measures organizational readiness across AI policy clarity, approval workflows, risk tiering, and control maturity. Designed for cross-functional teams involved in AI development, deployment, or oversight.
템플릿 보기AI Feature Adoption & Value Perception Survey
Measures user interest, perceived value, adoption barriers, and willingness to pay for AI-powered product features. Designed for SaaS product teams prioritizing their AI roadmap based on user feedback.
템플릿 보기AI Disclosure & Transparency Expectations Survey
Measures consumer expectations for AI transparency across products and services, capturing preferred disclosure methods, acceptability thresholds, and trust drivers to inform product labeling and policy decisions.
템플릿 보기AI Agent Autonomy, Escalation & Control Preferences Survey
Measures user expectations for AI agent autonomy, preferred escalation and handoff mechanisms, permissible actions, spending thresholds, and risk concerns. Designed for UX researchers and product teams building agentic AI workflows.
템플릿 보기Doctor Appointment Chatbot Experience Survey
Measures how well an AI scheduling chatbot helps patients book, reschedule, or get answers about medical appointments, covering task completion, trust, and friction points — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment the chatbot helped or failed.
템플릿 보기AI Adoption in Higher Education
A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.
템플릿 보기