Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey
Measures how well employees recognize threats, follow security policy, and actually behave when something looks suspicious — not just what training they sat through. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt to surface the gaps that policy audits miss.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 12 months, which security awareness training have you completed?
- General security awareness course
- Phishing simulation exercise
- Data handling / privacy training
- Remote work security training
- None that I can recall
How confident are you that you could correctly identify a phishing email if one landed in your inbox today?
In the last 30 days, how often have you encountered an email, text, or message that seemed suspicious?
- Never
- Once
- A few times
- Weekly or more often
Thinking about the most recent suspicious message you saw, what did you actually do?
- Reported it through the official channel
- Deleted or ignored it without reporting
- Clicked a link or opened an attachment before realizing
- Forwarded it to a coworker to check
- Wasn't sure what to do, so did nothing
How much do you agree with each statement about security at your organization?
- I know exactly how to report a suspected phishing attempt
- I would feel comfortable reporting a mistake I made without fear of punishment
- Our security policies are written in a way I can actually understand
- My manager visibly follows good security practices
Which of these security topics would be most and least valuable to cover in future training?
- Spotting phishing emails and texts
- Creating and managing strong passwords
- Securing home and remote work networks
- Recognizing phone-based social engineering
- Physical security (badges, tailgating, visitors)
- Handling sensitive customer or company data
- Safe use of cloud storage and file sharing
- Mobile device and app security
Ask the respondent to walk through the last time they felt even briefly unsure about a message, link, or request — what made it feel off, what they actually did in the moment, and whether they told anyone. If they say they'd always report something, probe for a specific counterexample or reason reporting felt awkward, slow, or pointless. If they can't recall any suspicious moment, ask what would make them notice one.
If you suspected your account had been compromised right now, would you know exactly who to contact?
- Yes, I know exactly who
- I have a rough idea
- No, I would have to search for it
How would you rate the format and length of the security training you've received?
Which best describes your department?
- Engineering / IT
- Sales / Marketing
- Finance / Legal
- Operations / HR
- Customer Support
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2 to 5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you. Your answers, along with everyone else's, will be used to shape more relevant, less generic security training and to fix any gaps in how easy it is to report concerns.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt, surfacing behavioral gaps that policy audits and static forms miss
- Combines standard awareness questions (training completed, confidence identifying phishing, incident response know-how) with a matrix on agreement about security culture and a max-diff prioritization of future training topics
- Asks what respondents actually did the last time they saw a suspicious message, not just what they were trained on, distinguishing stated policy knowledge from real behavior
- Closes with a transparent chat-based explanation of how responses will be used, and produces an auto-generated report for HR/security teams without manual tallying
Jotform
Security Awareness Survey Form TemplateA fielding-ready static form template covering general security awareness questions, easily customizable within Jotform's form builder. It relies on fixed multiple-choice and rating items rather than any adaptive follow-up. Good for quick deployment but not built to probe individual incidents in depth.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use, fully customizable form builder
- Simple to deploy and embed across channels
- Part of a broad, well-known survey/form ecosystem
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific hesitation or incident
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No documented methodology or transparent prompt logic
SurveyMonkey
Security Awareness Survey TemplateA standard fielding-ready template of fixed questions on security training and awareness, benefiting from SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It captures self-reported knowledge and attitudes but not real-time behavioral detail. There is no mechanism to explore a specific recent suspicious-message experience beyond a checkbox answer.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking tools
- Easy to launch, distribute, and track responses
- Familiar respondent experience
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to explore a specific moment of doubt
- No voice-based interview option
- No transparent, per-question methodology disclosure
SurveySparrow
Information Security Risk Assessment QuestionnaireThis is framed more broadly as an organizational risk-assessment questionnaire rather than an employee-behavior/phishing-specific survey, so it's a partial match. It's a fielding-ready static template with SurveySparrow's conversational UI, but questions are fixed rather than adaptive. Best suited to compliance-style risk scoring rather than uncovering individual behavioral gaps.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-like survey UI improves completion rates
- Positioned for broader risk-assessment/compliance use cases
- Supports standard question branching logic
아쉬운 점
- No AI-driven follow-up interview to probe a specific recent incident
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
- Static questionnaire structure, not adaptive to individual answers
자주 묻는 질문
“Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?
바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 13개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're checking how security training actually shows up in day-to-day decisions…” · “In the last 12 months, which security awareness training have you completed?” · “How confident are you that you could correctly identify a phishing email if one landed in your inbox today?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.
이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?
응답자는 보통 질문 13개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.
템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?
네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.
이 템플릿은 무료인가요?
네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Tattoo Studio Consent & Data Privacy Experience Survey
Measures whether clients getting tattooed truly understood the risks, aftercare, and how their health data, ID, and photos will be stored before they signed — built for tattoo studios and body art compliance teams. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment of signing to surface what was actually explained versus assumed.
템플릿 보기Employee Phishing Readiness & Security Behavior Assessment
Measures employee phishing detection confidence, reporting behavior, and security practices to identify organizational risk gaps and prioritize awareness training investments.
템플릿 보기Employee Computer Security Awareness & Behavior Survey
Measures how employees actually handle passwords, multi-factor authentication, updates, and suspicious messages day to day — not just what they know in theory. Built for IT and security teams auditing awareness programs, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real near-miss or incident instead of a hypothetical one.
템플릿 보기Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey
Measures employee perceptions of phishing simulation realism, behavioral responses, confidence changes, and training preferences to help security teams optimize their awareness programs.
템플릿 보기Workplace Health & Safety Culture Survey
Measures how employees experience hazard awareness, incident reporting, and safety training in practice — not just policy on paper. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened the last time someone saw or reported a safety issue, including any fear of retaliation, giving safety teams a real picture behind the scores.
템플릿 보기Workplace Safety Climate and Incident Reporting Survey
Measures how safe employees feel day-to-day, how strong your safety culture and reporting habits actually are, and what stops people from speaking up — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real near-miss or incident and what would change how it's handled next time.
템플릿 보기