QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Privacy & Compliance

Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey

Measures employee perceptions of phishing simulation realism, behavioral responses, confidence changes, and training preferences to help security teams optimize their awareness programs.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 20개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This brief survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with recent phishing simulations at this organization. Your responses are completely confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to improve security awareness training. Participation is voluntary, you may stop at any time, and there are no right or wrong answers—we simply want your honest opinions. Thank you for your time.

Q02
객관식

Have you ever received a phishing simulation email from this employer?

  • Yes, at this employer
  • Yes, but only at a previous employer
  • No, never
  • Not sure
Q03
의견 척도

Overall, how realistic did the most recent phishing simulation feel?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all realistic최대:Extremely realistic
Q04
의견 척도

Before your most recent simulation, how confident were you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q05
순위 매기기

Please rank the following training formats from most helpful to least helpful.

  1. Interactive phishing simulations
  2. Short videos (≤3 minutes)
  3. Live workshops or webinars
  4. Job aid or one-page checklist
  5. Email tips or newsletters
  6. Microlearning modules (5–10 minutes)
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, what suggestions do you have for improving future phishing simulations or related security training? Please share any specifics.

Q07
드롭다운

On a typical workday, approximately how many emails do you handle?

  • 0–24
  • 25–74
  • 75–149
  • 150+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for participating! Your feedback will directly help us make phishing simulations and security training more relevant and effective.

Q09
객관식

When was the most recent phishing simulation you recall receiving from this employer?

  • Within the last 7 days
  • 2–4 weeks ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • More than 3 months ago
  • I don't recall
  • Not applicable—I haven't received one here
Q10
객관식

Which aspects of the simulation felt realistic? Select all that apply.

  • Sender name and email address
  • Subject line
  • Email body content and tone
  • Visual design and branding
  • Call-to-action (link or attachment)
  • Timing of delivery
  • None of the above
Q11
의견 척도

Today, how confident are you in your ability to recognize and respond to phishing emails?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q12
객관식

How frequently would you prefer to receive phishing simulations?

  • Twice per month
  • Monthly
  • Every 2 months
  • Quarterly
  • Twice per year
  • Once per year
Q13
드롭다운

Which of the following best describes your primary job function?

  • Engineering/IT
  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Human Resources
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Marketing/Communications
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

Thinking about your most recent simulation from this employer, what did you do? Select all that apply.

  • Reported it using the reporting tool/process
  • Deleted it without interacting
  • Clicked a link or opened an attachment
  • Replied to the message
  • Ignored it and took no action
  • Asked a colleague or IT for advice
  • Marked it as spam/junk
  • I don't recall
Q15
의견 척도

How difficult was it to identify the most recent simulation as a phishing attempt?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very easy to identify최대:Very difficult to identify
Q16
객관식

What, if anything, did you learn or reinforce from the simulation(s)? Select all that apply.

  • How to use the report button or process
  • How to inspect URLs safely
  • Common red flags to watch for
  • How to verify sender identity
  • To pause and validate urgent requests
  • Where to find internal guidance/resources
  • Nothing new to me
Q17
드롭다운

How long have you worked at this organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
객관식

Which cues, if any, did you notice in the simulation? Select all that apply.

  • Suspicious sender or domain
  • Generic greeting or unusual salutation
  • Spelling or grammar errors
  • Urgent or threatening language
  • Unexpected attachment
  • Mismatched or odd-looking URL
  • Unusual request for sensitive data
  • Off-brand visuals or layout
  • Timing felt unusual (e.g., outside business hours)
  • I did not notice any specific cues
Q19
의견 척도

In the next 30 days, how likely are you to change any of your email habits based on these simulations (e.g., reporting suspicious messages faster, inspecting links more carefully)?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q20
드롭다운

In which region are you primarily based?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes respondents on their own suggestions for improving the phishing program, rather than stopping at closed-ended ratings
  • Combines opinion-scale confidence tracking (before vs. today) with multiple-choice behavioral recall questions, so you can measure both perceived and self-reported behavior change from the same simulation event
  • Uses ranking and preference questions (training format ranking, frequency preference) to directly inform program redesign, not just measure satisfaction
  • Ends with auto-generated reporting and transparent prompts, so security teams can see exactly what was asked in the AI portion and trust the resulting summary

SurveySparrow

Post Training Survey Template | Feedback From Employees

This is a general post-training feedback template, not specific to phishing or security awareness, so questions would need heavy customization to fit a phishing simulation use case. It's a ready-to-field form with SurveySparrow's conversational-style UI. There's no built-in mechanism for adaptive probing into why someone clicked or reported a simulated email.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey format that can feel less clinical than a standard form
  • Purpose-built for employee training feedback, so core structure (satisfaction, relevance, usefulness) transfers reasonably well

아쉬운 점

  • Not phishing-specific out of the box, requiring manual rebuilding of simulation-related questions
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into individual responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

QuestionPro

Training Effectiveness Survey Questions | Post-Training Evaluation Sample Template

This template targets general training effectiveness evaluation (e.g., Kirkpatrick-style questions) rather than phishing simulations specifically. It's a fielding-ready template within a full-featured survey platform, useful as a starting point but not tailored to security awareness behaviors or cues. Teams would need to add phishing-specific items themselves.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with broad question-type support and analytics
  • Structured around established training-evaluation frameworks, useful for benchmarking general learning outcomes

아쉬운 점

  • No phishing simulation-specific content (realism, cues noticed, click/report behavior)
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI interview option — follow-up questions are static and pre-written
  • No transparent, per-question AI prompt disclosure or automated quality scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

Security Awareness Survey Template

This is the most directly comparable template, covering general security awareness rather than phishing simulation specifics like realism, cues noticed, or confidence shift after a simulation. It's a ready-to-use static form backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and reporting tools. It would need supplementing to capture pre/post confidence and training-format preferences in the depth QuestionPunk's template does.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known, easy-to-deploy platform with strong distribution and basic reporting/dashboards
  • Covers broad security awareness topics that overlap with phishing training programs

아쉬운 점

  • Focused on general security awareness, not simulation-specific realism, cues, or behavioral recall
  • Fixed-question static form with no adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

자주 묻는 질문

“Phishing Simulation Effectiveness & Feedback Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 20개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Welcome! This brief survey (approximately 10 minutes) asks about your experience with recent phishing simulations at thi…” · “Have you ever received a phishing simulation email from this employer?” · “Overall, how realistic did the most recent phishing simulation feel?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 20개를 약 9분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

이 템플릿 사용하기무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Privacy & Compliance

RBAC Clarity & Access Control Confidence Assessment

Measures how well product administrators understand role-based access control concepts, permission scopes, and inheritance behaviors. Use this to identify confusion points, predictability gaps, and documentation needs that impact governance and security posture.

템플릿 보기
Privacy & Compliance

Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey

Measures how well employees recognize threats, follow security policy, and actually behave when something looks suspicious — not just what training they sat through. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt to surface the gaps that policy audits miss.

템플릿 보기
Privacy & Compliance

Employee Phishing Readiness & Security Behavior Assessment

Measures employee phishing detection confidence, reporting behavior, and security practices to identify organizational risk gaps and prioritize awareness training investments.

템플릿 보기
Privacy & Compliance

Employee Computer Security Awareness & Behavior Survey

Measures how employees actually handle passwords, multi-factor authentication, updates, and suspicious messages day to day — not just what they know in theory. Built for IT and security teams auditing awareness programs, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real near-miss or incident instead of a hypothetical one.

템플릿 보기
Privacy & Compliance

Employee Training Program Effectiveness Survey

Measures whether recent training actually changed what employees can do on the job — covering content quality, format preferences, and topic priorities — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness scores instead of settling for a number.

템플릿 보기
Privacy & Compliance

Training Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey

Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.

템플릿 보기