Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿Industry-Specific
University Exit Experience & Outcomes Survey
For students leaving a university — whether they graduated, withdrew, or transferred — this survey captures how they rate teaching, advising, support services, and overall value, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the real story behind their satisfaction score instead of settling for a flat rating.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q02
객관식필수
Which best describes how your time at the university is ending?
- Graduated (completed my degree)
- Withdrew before completing
- Dismissed / academic suspension
- Transferred to another institution
- Other
Q03
의견 척도필수
Overall, how satisfied are you with your experience at this university?
척도: 1 – 10
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
매트릭스필수
Please rate each part of your experience.
6개 행 × 5개 열
- Quality of teaching and instruction
- Academic advising
- Career services and job preparation
- Campus facilities and resources
- Mental health and wellness support
- 외 1개
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
From this list, which factors mattered most and least to your overall experience?
- Quality of teaching
- Affordability and financial aid
- Career preparation and internships
- Academic advising
- Mental health and wellness support
- Campus life and student activities
- Class sizes and access to professors
- Diversity and inclusion on campus
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Mattered most최악:Mattered least
Q06
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this university to a friend or family member considering it?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
AI 인터뷰
Probe the real story behind the respondent's overall satisfaction and recommendation scores. Anchor on whichever aspect they rated lowest in the ratings battery and ask for a specific moment or example that shaped that rating. If they scored everything high, ask what almost went wrong or what could have made it even better. If they withdrew or were dismissed, gently ask what the turning point was and whether anything could have changed the outcome.
Q08
점수 배분필수
If the university had 100 points to spend improving the student experience, how would you allocate them across these areas?
- Improving academic advising
- Expanding career services
- Increasing mental health support
- Upgrading campus facilities
- Lowering cost / increasing financial aid
- Enhancing campus community programming
100점 배분
Q09
객관식
What are your plans immediately after leaving the university?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Continuing education (graduate or professional school)
- Still job searching
- Military service
- Taking time off
- Other
Q10
장문형
If you could change one thing about your university experience, what would it be and why?
Q11
메시지
Almost done! A few optional background questions help us understand differences across groups — feel free to skip any of these.
Q12
객관식
What was your field of study?
- Arts & Humanities
- Business
- Education
- Engineering & Technology
- Health Sciences
- Natural Sciences
- Social Sciences
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식
Which age range best describes you?
- 18-21
- 22-25
- 26-30
- 31-40
- 41+
- Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지
Thank you for sharing your experience! Your responses will be combined with other departing students' feedback to help improve advising, support services, and campus life for future cohorts.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Combines standard exit metrics (overall satisfaction, matrix ratings, likelihood to recommend, constant-sum budget allocation, max-diff prioritization) with a dedicated AI follow-up interview that probes the real story behind the satisfaction and recommendation scores
- Captures how the student's time is ending (graduated, withdrew, transferred) and their immediate post-departure plans, not just a generic exit rating
- Includes an open-ended 'one thing you'd change' question plus optional background questions (field of study, age range, gender) for segment analysis
- Uses transparent, auto-generated reporting so teams can see how satisfaction scores map to the qualitative reasons uncovered in the AI interview
QuestionPro
University exit survey templateA ready-to-field template built specifically for university student exits, covering satisfaction and experience ratings similar to ours. It's a static questionnaire rather than a conversational interview, so all nuance has to be captured through pre-written closed and open-ended items. Good baseline coverage for a straightforward exit survey without deeper qualitative follow-up.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the university exit use case, not a repurposed HR/employee template
- Likely includes standard satisfaction and experience-rating questions relevant to students leaving
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad template library and distribution tools
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into why a student gave a particular satisfaction or recommendation score
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt-level methodology
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Industry-Specific
U.S. Presidential Approval & Trust Tracker
Tracks how the public rates the current President's overall performance, trust, and handling of specific issues like the economy and foreign policy — for pollsters, newsrooms, and researchers who need a quick pulse read. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific event or issue actually driving each respondent's rating, not just the label they picked.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Post-Stay Hotel Guest Experience Survey
Captures how guests rated check-in, room quality, staff, and value after a recent stay, plus their likelihood to recommend and rebook. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind their score — what made or broke the stay — so hotel teams get specifics, not just star ratings.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Restaurant Dining Experience Feedback Survey
Captures how diners rate food, service, value, and atmosphere after a specific visit, plus their likelihood to recommend and return. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete moment behind their recommendation score — what stood out or went wrong — so the team gets specifics they can act on, not just star ratings.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
대학 교원 만족도 및 유지 조사
교원이 보수, 업무량, 연구 지원, 거버넌스, 경력 발전에 대해 얼마나 만족하는지, 그리고 얼마나 많은 교원이 이직을 진지하게 고려하고 있는지를 측정합니다. 부총장, 학장, 교원 담당 부서를 위해 설계되었으며, AI 후속 인터뷰는 단순한 수치가 아니라 낮은 점수나 이직 의향 뒤에 있는 구체적인 이유를 파고듭니다.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey
Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.
템플릿 보기Industry-Specific
In-Store Shopper Trip and Checkout Experience Survey
Captures what shoppers came to buy, how they navigated the store, what they did when an item was missing, and how checkout felt — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasoning behind substitution choices and navigation friction. Built for retail insights and category management teams.
템플릿 보기