Consumer Trust in Carbon Offset Claims Survey
Measures consumer trust in corporate carbon-offset claims, preferences for emissions reductions vs. offsets, and willingness to pay a premium. Designed to inform ESG strategy, sustainability communications, and brand positioning.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 12 months, have you seen or heard companies make "carbon neutral" or carbon-offset claims?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
The next few questions ask how much you trust different types of carbon-offset claims companies make.
Now, think about what information would change how much you trust an offset claim. For each detail below, indicate how much it would increase or decrease your trust.
When it comes to addressing their environmental impact, where should companies place greater emphasis?
If you trusted a company's carbon-offset claims, how willing would you be to pay a premium for their product?
In the past 12 months, have you personally paid extra for carbon offsets (e.g., at checkout, for flights, or via donations)?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
What would most increase your confidence in a company's carbon-offset claims?
What is your age?
- Under 18
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey—your perspectives are valuable and will help inform research on corporate climate action. Your responses have been recorded.
Where have you seen or heard these claims? (Select all that apply.)
- On product packaging
- On company websites
- In advertisements (online, TV, print)
- In-store signage
- On social media
- In sustainability or CSR reports
- In news articles or press releases
- Other (please specify)
How much do you trust a company that claims: "We are carbon neutral"?
How would your trust in a carbon-offset claim change if the company provided independent third-party verification of its offsets?
Rank the following factors by how much they matter to you when evaluating a company's carbon-offset claims. (1 = most important)
- Evidence is specific and verifiable
- Offsets address only unavoidable emissions
- Environmental additionality is demonstrated
- Long-term monitoring is in place
- Cost-effectiveness of the offset
- Brand or company credibility
How likely are you to choose a product with credible carbon-offset claims over a similar product without such claims, if both are the same price?
Where did you pay for carbon offsets? (Select all that apply.)
- Air travel offset add-on
- Retail checkout add-on (online or in-store)
- Donation to a climate project
- Utility or energy green tariff
- Subscription to a climate or tree-planting program
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about companies' use of carbon offsets and their approach to climate action.
Which best describes your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How much do you trust a company that claims: "This product's carbon emissions have been fully offset"?
How would your trust change if the company disclosed specific project details (e.g., location, project type, developer)?
Rank the following climate actions in order of where you think companies should invest most. (1 = highest priority)
- Emissions reductions in own operations
- Supplier and logistics decarbonization
- Product design and efficiency improvements
- High-quality nature-based offsets (e.g., reforestation)
- High-quality technology-based carbon removals
- Measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV)
Where do you currently live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How much do you trust a company that claims: "We offset X tonnes of CO₂ annually through verified projects"?
How would your trust change if the company published a transparent cost breakdown showing how offset funds are spent?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Postgraduate degree
- Prefer not to say
How much do you trust a company that claims: "Certified carbon neutral by an independent third party"?
How would your trust change if the company demonstrated that its offsets are additional (i.e., would not have happened without the company's funding)?
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Homemaker
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
How would your trust change if the company provided regular public progress reports on its offset projects?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond a single trust rating by testing five distinct claim types (self-declared, product-level, tonnage-based, third-party certified) to see which specific wording actually builds credibility.
- Includes a dedicated block on what would increase trust — independent verification, project detail disclosure, cost breakdowns, additionality, and progress reporting — giving ESG teams actionable levers, not just a score.
- Pairs ranking questions (priority of reduction vs. offsetting, order of climate actions) with willingness-to-pay and choice-likelihood scales to connect trust directly to purchase behavior.
- Closes with an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes open-ended reasoning behind respondents' trust and WTP answers, plus an auto-generated report — depth a static claims-testing form can't produce.
SurveySparrow
Consumer Brand Preference Questionnaire Template | To know the effect of advertisementThis is a general brand-preference/advertising-effect template, not a carbon-offset or sustainability-claims instrument, so it would need heavy rebuilding to measure trust in ESG claims specifically. It's a fielding-ready template for its stated purpose, with SurveySparrow's usual conversational form style.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that can improve completion rates
- Ready-to-use template structure for measuring general brand perception
Where it falls short
- No content addressing carbon-offset trust, ESG claim types, or willingness-to-pay for sustainability premiums
- Static question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up probing on open-ended answers
SurveyMonkey
Messaging/claims Testing Survey TemplateThis is a general-purpose claims/messaging-testing template, useful for gauging reaction to specific marketing statements but not built around carbon offsets, ESG trust drivers, or offset-related willingness to pay. It is a fielding-ready generic template that a sustainability team would need to substantially customize.
What it does well
- Purpose-built for testing how different message wording lands with audiences
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and panel tools
Where it falls short
- No carbon-offset-specific content (claim types, additionality, certification trust) out of the box
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI interview to probe why a claim was or wasn't trusted
- No transparent, published prompt methodology behind any AI-assisted analysis
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Carbon Dashboard Comprehension & Actionability Assessment
Evaluates internal stakeholders' ability to interpret carbon metrics and translate dashboard insights into prioritized actions, using scenario-based comprehension tasks and self-reported usability measures.
View templateBiodiversity KPI Maturity & Readiness Assessment
Benchmarks employee awareness, tracking practices, data quality confidence, barriers, and priorities for biodiversity impact KPIs. Designed for sustainability, operations, and ESG teams to inform reporting strategy and capability investment.
View templateClimate Change Awareness, Concern, and Action Survey
Measures how aware, concerned, and behaviorally engaged people are with climate change — from perceived risk and trust in institutions to everyday actions — with an AI follow-up that digs into the gap between stated concern and real-world behavior. Built for sustainability teams, communicators, and researchers tracking public climate sentiment.
View templateManufacturing Supplier ESG Performance Audit
A structured audit instrument for assessing manufacturing suppliers across environmental, social, and governance pillars. Designed for procurement and sustainability teams to identify ESG risks, benchmark supplier maturity, and prioritize collaborative improvement initiatives.
View templateScope 3 GHG Emissions Readiness Assessment
Evaluates internal stakeholder readiness to measure and report Scope 3 supply chain emissions, identifying capability gaps, data maturity, supplier engagement levels, and barriers across functional teams.
View templateConsumer Trust in Green Claims & Evidence Preferences
Measures consumer credibility perceptions of environmental claims, preferred evidence types, and greenwashing experiences to inform sustainability messaging strategy.
View template