Q01
Message
All templatesProduct & UX
Cross-Functional Go/No-Go Launch Readiness Assessment
A structured stakeholder assessment that measures launch confidence, track-level readiness, risk prioritization, and operational preparedness to support data-driven go/no-go decisions.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
30 questions · ~13 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
Which function(s) are you representing in this decision? (Select all that apply)
- Product Management
- Engineering
- Design/UX
- QA/Testing
- Data/Analytics
- Security/Privacy
- Legal/Compliance
- Sales
- Marketing
- Customer Support/Success
- Finance
- DevOps/SRE
- Other (please specify)
Q03
Opinion Scale
How confident are you that we can successfully launch on the planned date?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q04
Message
The following questions ask you to rate readiness across key launch tracks. Rate only the areas you have visibility into.
Q05
Opinion Scale
How would you rate the overall risk level for this launch, based on the current state?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very low riskMax:Very high risk
Q06
Multiple Choice
Which of the following go-live checks are complete? (Select all that apply)
- Runbook documented
- Monitoring/alerts configured
- Rollback plan tested
- On-call coverage scheduled
- Communication plan approved
- Support documentation ready
- None of the above
Q07
Long Text
Is there anything else that could change your recommendation in the next week?
Q08
Dropdown
What is your primary region/time zone?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Other
Q09
Message
Thank you for your input. Your responses will be aggregated across all stakeholders to inform the go/no-go decision. Results will be shared at the upcoming decision meeting.
Q10
Dropdown
What stage is the initiative currently in?
- Discovery
- Alpha
- Beta
- General Availability (GA)
- Hotfix/Patch
- Not sure
Q11
Long Text
What blockers, unknowns, or concerns—if any—should be addressed before launch?
Q12
Opinion Scale
How ready is the product scope and requirements definition for launch?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not readyMax:Fully ready
Q13
Ranking
Rank the following risks to launch readiness from highest to lowest concern.
- Timeline slippage
- Quality defects
- Scope creep
- External dependency
- Limited capacity/resources
- Compliance or privacy risk
Drag to rank
Q14
Multiple Choice
Are day-one success metrics defined and instrumented?
- Yes, fully defined and instrumented
- Partially defined or not fully instrumented
- No
- Not applicable
Q15
AI Interview
We'd like to understand your perspective on launch readiness in more depth. Please share your thoughts and our AI moderator will ask brief follow-up questions.
Q16
Dropdown
What is your current seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director
- VP/Executive
- Other
Q17
Multiple Choice
Have you participated in prior launches of similar scope?
- Yes
- No
Q18
Multiple Choice
What is your current recommendation?
- Go as planned
- Go with minor conditions
- Delay to address issues
- No go (do not launch)
- Need more data
Q19
Opinion Scale
How ready is the engineering implementation and code completeness for launch?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not readyMax:Fully ready
Q20
Multiple Choice
Which dependencies could impact the launch if unresolved? (Select all that apply)
- Backend service/API
- Third-party vendor readiness/change
- Security review / pen test
- Legal review
- App store approval (if applicable)
- Data migration
- Localization/translation
- Support content/training
- Sales enablement
- Analytics instrumentation
- Other (please specify)
Q21
Dropdown
What rollout strategy do you recommend for this launch?
- Big bang
- Phased rollout
- Feature flag/toggle
- A/B experiment
- Pilot/allowlist
- Not decided
Q22
Dropdown
How long have you been with the company?
- Under 3 months
- 3–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3–5 years
- 5+ years
Q23
Long Text
What specific data, tests, or evidence would help you make a clearer recommendation?
Q24
Opinion Scale
How ready is QA and testing coverage for launch?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not readyMax:Fully ready
Q25
Long Text
What are the most important mitigation steps we should take before launch?
Q26
Long Text
What team or organization do you belong to? (Optional)
Q27
Opinion Scale
How ready is the security and privacy review for launch?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not readyMax:Fully ready
Q28
Ranking
Rank the following areas by where the next two weeks of effort should be focused, from most to least important.
- Product scope clarification
- Engineering implementation
- QA/Testing
- Security/Privacy
- Observability/Telemetry
- Support/Customer Success readiness
- Legal/Compliance
- Release packaging and documentation
Drag to rank
Q29
Opinion Scale
How ready is the operations and infrastructure setup for launch?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not readyMax:Fully ready
Q30
Opinion Scale
How ready is customer support and documentation for launch?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not readyMax:Fully ready
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Combines a structured go/no-go recommendation and confidence rating with track-by-track readiness scoring (scope, engineering, QA, security, ops, support) so leadership sees both the verdict and the underlying evidence
- Includes risk and effort ranking exercises plus dependency and go-live-checklist multiple-choice questions to surface blockers and prioritize the final two weeks of work
- Adds an AI follow-up interview that lets each stakeholder elaborate on their reasoning in their own words, going beyond a fixed rating grid
- Captures respondent context (function, seniority, tenure, region) so readiness and risk scores can be segmented across the organization, and closes with a clear aggregation message for transparency
Jotform
Operational Readiness Assessment TemplateA static form template for assessing operational readiness, likely covering standard checklist-style categories rather than a multi-track go/no-go decision framework. It's a fielding-ready form but built for general operational sign-off rather than cross-functional launch decisions specifically. Customization is possible but the structure isn't tailored to risk ranking or stakeholder recommendation capture.
What it does well
- Fielding-ready template usable immediately in Jotform's form builder
- Broad focus on operational readiness that could apply across many use cases
- Likely integrates with Jotform's existing form logic and notification tools
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing into open-ended concerns
- No mechanism to capture stakeholder reasoning beyond fixed fields
- No transparent, publishable methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized
Typeform
Product Readiness Assessment by Smartbug MediaA Typeform template built by an agency partner to gauge product readiness, presumably using Typeform's conversational single-question flow. It appears oriented around product-level readiness rather than a full cross-functional go/no-go framework spanning engineering, QA, security, ops, and support. Good for quick pulse-checks but not designed as a structured decision-support instrument with risk prioritization.
What it does well
- Polished, conversational question flow typical of Typeform's UI
- Quick to deploy for a general product-readiness pulse check
- Backed by an agency's applied template design
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to probe deeper on flagged risks or concerns
- No structured risk-ranking or dependency-mapping questions evident
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated readiness report
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Product & UX
Product Recommendation Experience & Personalization Survey
Measures user satisfaction with recommendation relevance, perceived control, and content diversity. Designed for product teams optimizing personalization engines and recommendation UX.
View templateProduct & UX
Prototype Usability Debrief Survey
A structured post-session debrief for prototype usability tests, measuring task completion, perceived difficulty, friction points, and improvement priorities to inform iterative design decisions.
View templateProduct & UX
Product Retention & Value Proposition Assessment
Measures why active users stay, what value they perceive, and where retention risk exists. Designed for product teams assessing product-market fit, switching costs, and competitive positioning.
View templateProduct & UX
User Trust & Consent Preferences for Privacy-Preserving Analytics
Measures users' comprehension of privacy-preserving analytics techniques, trust in identity protection, and preferences for consent controls and defaults. Designed for UX researchers and product teams evaluating analytics transparency features.
View templateProduct & UX
Push Notification UX: Timing, Frequency & Control Preferences
Measures user satisfaction with push notification experiences across timing, frequency, perceived control, and content value. Designed for product and UX teams optimizing notification strategies for mobile or web applications.
View templateProduct & UX
Cross-Device UX Evaluation: Gestures, Layout & Accessibility
Measures user experience across mobile, tablet, and desktop devices, focusing on gesture usability, layout navigation, readability, accessibility feature usage, and cross-device consistency. Designed for UX research teams evaluating responsive design quality.
View template