eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment
Evaluates e-discovery software usability, workflow pain points, and feature priorities across the EDRM lifecycle. Designed for legal professionals, litigation support teams, and legal operations who use e-discovery platforms on active matters.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
When did you last use an e-discovery tool on an actual matter?
- Today
- In the last 7 days
- 8–30 days ago
- 1–3 months ago
- 3–12 months ago
- More than a year ago
Which of the following best describes your primary role on matters involving e-discovery?
- In-house counsel
- Outside counsel
- Litigation support / e-discovery manager
- Paralegal / reviewer
- IT / legal operations
- Compliance / investigations
- Other
Rank the following e-discovery workflow steps by the amount of time you typically spend on each (drag the most time-consuming to the top).
- Data ingestion/processing
- Culling (deduplication, deNIST, date scoping)
- Search and filtering
- Document review
- Coding/tagging decisions
- Privilege/quality control
- Production/export packaging
Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary e-discovery tool's usability over the last 30 days?
Rank the following factors by how much they influence your e-discovery tool choice (drag the most important to the top).
- Speed and performance
- Search power and accuracy
- Ease of use for reviewers
- Privilege and QC capabilities
- Production and export reliability
- Analytics and AI features
- Total cost of ownership
- Security and compliance certifications
If you experienced a frustrating moment with your e-discovery tool in the last 90 days, please briefly describe what happened.
How many years have you worked with e-discovery tools?
- 0–1 years
- 2–4 years
- 5–9 years
- 10–14 years
- 15+ years
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to improve e-discovery tools and workflows. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team.
Which e-discovery platform do you use most often on active matters?
- Relativity
- Everlaw
- DISCO
- Logikcull
- Reveal / Brainspace
- Nuix
- Microsoft Purview eDiscovery (Premium)
- Other or mixed tools
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was data ingestion and processing in your primary tool?
How would you rate your primary tool's speed and performance during peak review periods in the last 30 days?
Rank the following potential improvements by how much they would help your team (drag the most helpful to the top).
- Faster performance at scale
- Smarter search (concepts/AI)
- Simpler reviewer interface
- Stronger privilege/QC tools
- Easier, more reliable productions
- Smoother integrations and data imports
Based on your responses in this survey, we'd like to explore your e-discovery experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
What type of organization do you primarily work in?
- Law firm
- In-house legal department
- Government/regulator
- Consultancy/ALSP
- Corporate IT / Legal Operations
- Other
- Prefer not to say
During an active matter, how frequently do you use e-discovery tools?
- Multiple times a day
- Daily
- Several times a week
- Weekly
- Less than weekly
- Only at specific milestones
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was search and filtering in your primary tool?
How likely are you to recommend your primary e-discovery tool to a colleague?
If you could change one thing about your primary e-discovery tool, what would it be?
Approximately how many employees are in your organization?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–20,000
- 20,001+
- Prefer not to say
Which matter types have you supported with e-discovery in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Civil/commercial litigation
- Internal investigations
- Regulatory inquiries/response
- Arbitration
- Data subject access requests (DSARs)
- Compliance audits/monitoring
- M&A or due diligence
- Other
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was document review in your primary tool?
Which of the following issues did you encounter with your primary e-discovery tool in the last 60 days? Select all that apply.
- Slow page loads or timeouts
- Indexing or processing delays
- Search misses or inconsistent results
- Export/production failures
- Confusing error messages
- Tag/coding conflicts or overrides
- Permissions or access confusion
- Unexpected billing/usage spikes
- None of the above
In which region is your primary work location?
- North America
- Europe, Middle East, or Africa (EMEA)
- Asia-Pacific (APAC)
- Latin America
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was production and export packaging in your primary tool?
How did you primarily learn to use your current e-discovery tool?
- Formal vendor training
- Internal training program
- Self-taught (docs/videos)
- Peer coaching/mentoring
- External consultant
- No formal training
Approximately how many people on your typical matter team use the e-discovery tool?
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21–50
- 51+
- Varies significantly
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Purpose-built for the EDRM lifecycle, covering ingestion/processing, search/filtering, review, and production as distinct usability checkpoints rather than a single generic usability score
- Includes role, platform, matter-type, and organizational firmographic questions so results can be segmented by litigation support role, org type, and team size
- Combines structured opinion-scale, ranking, and multiple-choice questions with two open-text prompts and an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into a respondent's specific frustrating moments and tool-change requests
- Pairs quantitative usability ratings (satisfaction, performance, recommend-likelihood) with qualitative detail on issues encountered and how users learned the tool, giving both benchmarking and narrative insight
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey Template | Sample Survey, Examples, Questions & QuestionnairesThis is a generic, industry-agnostic System Usability Scale (SUS) template rather than anything built for e-discovery or legal workflows specifically. It's useful as a general usability-scoring instrument but would require heavy customization to capture EDRM-stage pain points, matter types, or platform-specific issues. It reads as a static questionnaire template rather than a fielding-ready, domain-specific assessment.
What it does well
- Based on the well-established, validated SUS methodology for measuring perceived usability
- Simple, short format that's easy to field quickly across any software product
- Produces a standardized usability score that's comparable across studies
Where it falls short
- Not tailored to e-discovery workflows, EDRM stages, or legal-industry terminology
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual pain points or frustrating moments
- No mechanism for guided screen-share tasks, automated per-response quality scoring, or auto-generated reporting
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Data Access Request (DSAR) Experience & Expectations Survey
Measures consumer experiences with data subject access requests and expectations around response timelines, suitable for organizations assessing GDPR/CCPA compliance perceptions and identifying friction points in the DSAR process.
View templateParticipant Preferences for Anonymized Data Sharing & Licensing
Measures research participants' comfort with anonymized data sharing, preferred licensing models, repository preferences, and required safeguards. Designed for IRB-compliant studies where researchers need informed consent data on secondary data use.
View templateData Retention Policy Comprehension & Usability Survey
Measures how well users understand your data retention policy, evaluates the discoverability and usability of retention-related controls, and identifies preferred communication formats to inform UX and compliance improvements.
View templateVendor DPA Clarity & Negotiability Assessment
An internal assessment for privacy, legal, and procurement professionals to evaluate the clarity, negotiability, and workflow efficiency of vendor Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), identifying bottlenecks and improvement priorities.
View templateDark Pattern Acceptability & Transparency Trust Survey
Measures consumer reactions to common dark-pattern design tactics and transparency preferences, providing actionable data on trust drivers for UX and product teams.
View templateAI Contract Review & Redlining Adoption Survey
Measures legal professionals' adoption levels, satisfaction, barriers, and safeguard requirements for AI-assisted contract review and redlining. Designed for legal operations, in-house teams, and law firm practitioners.
View template