All templates
Privacy & Compliance

eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment

Evaluates e-discovery software usability, workflow pain points, and feature priorities across the EDRM lifecycle. Designed for legal professionals, litigation support teams, and legal operations who use e-discovery platforms on active matters.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

27 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment. This survey asks about your experience with e-discovery software on recent matters. Your responses are confidential, will be reported only in aggregate, and will be used to identify usability improvements and workflow priorities. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. Estimated time: 8–10 minutes.

Q02
Dropdown

When did you last use an e-discovery tool on an actual matter?

  • Today
  • In the last 7 days
  • 8–30 days ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • 3–12 months ago
  • More than a year ago
Q03
Multiple Choice

Which of the following best describes your primary role on matters involving e-discovery?

  • In-house counsel
  • Outside counsel
  • Litigation support / e-discovery manager
  • Paralegal / reviewer
  • IT / legal operations
  • Compliance / investigations
  • Other
Q04
Ranking

Rank the following e-discovery workflow steps by the amount of time you typically spend on each (drag the most time-consuming to the top).

  1. Data ingestion/processing
  2. Culling (deduplication, deNIST, date scoping)
  3. Search and filtering
  4. Document review
  5. Coding/tagging decisions
  6. Privilege/quality control
  7. Production/export packaging
Drag to rank
Q05
Opinion Scale

Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary e-discovery tool's usability over the last 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q06
Ranking

Rank the following factors by how much they influence your e-discovery tool choice (drag the most important to the top).

  1. Speed and performance
  2. Search power and accuracy
  3. Ease of use for reviewers
  4. Privilege and QC capabilities
  5. Production and export reliability
  6. Analytics and AI features
  7. Total cost of ownership
  8. Security and compliance certifications
Drag to rank
Q07
Long Text

If you experienced a frustrating moment with your e-discovery tool in the last 90 days, please briefly describe what happened.

Q08
Dropdown

How many years have you worked with e-discovery tools?

  • 0–1 years
  • 2–4 years
  • 5–9 years
  • 10–14 years
  • 15+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to improve e-discovery tools and workflows. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team.

Q10
Multiple Choice

Which e-discovery platform do you use most often on active matters?

  • Relativity
  • Everlaw
  • DISCO
  • Logikcull
  • Reveal / Brainspace
  • Nuix
  • Microsoft Purview eDiscovery (Premium)
  • Other or mixed tools
Q11
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was data ingestion and processing in your primary tool?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q12
Opinion Scale

How would you rate your primary tool's speed and performance during peak review periods in the last 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q13
Ranking

Rank the following potential improvements by how much they would help your team (drag the most helpful to the top).

  1. Faster performance at scale
  2. Smarter search (concepts/AI)
  3. Simpler reviewer interface
  4. Stronger privilege/QC tools
  5. Easier, more reliable productions
  6. Smoother integrations and data imports
Drag to rank
Q14
AI Interview

Based on your responses in this survey, we'd like to explore your e-discovery experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.

Q15
Multiple Choice

What type of organization do you primarily work in?

  • Law firm
  • In-house legal department
  • Government/regulator
  • Consultancy/ALSP
  • Corporate IT / Legal Operations
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
Multiple Choice

During an active matter, how frequently do you use e-discovery tools?

  • Multiple times a day
  • Daily
  • Several times a week
  • Weekly
  • Less than weekly
  • Only at specific milestones
Q17
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was search and filtering in your primary tool?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q18
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to recommend your primary e-discovery tool to a colleague?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q19
Long Text

If you could change one thing about your primary e-discovery tool, what would it be?

Q20
Dropdown

Approximately how many employees are in your organization?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–20,000
  • 20,001+
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
Multiple Choice

Which matter types have you supported with e-discovery in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Civil/commercial litigation
  • Internal investigations
  • Regulatory inquiries/response
  • Arbitration
  • Data subject access requests (DSARs)
  • Compliance audits/monitoring
  • M&A or due diligence
  • Other
Q22
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was document review in your primary tool?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q23
Multiple Choice

Which of the following issues did you encounter with your primary e-discovery tool in the last 60 days? Select all that apply.

  • Slow page loads or timeouts
  • Indexing or processing delays
  • Search misses or inconsistent results
  • Export/production failures
  • Confusing error messages
  • Tag/coding conflicts or overrides
  • Permissions or access confusion
  • Unexpected billing/usage spikes
  • None of the above
Q24
Multiple Choice

In which region is your primary work location?

  • North America
  • Europe, Middle East, or Africa (EMEA)
  • Asia-Pacific (APAC)
  • Latin America
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was production and export packaging in your primary tool?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q26
Multiple Choice

How did you primarily learn to use your current e-discovery tool?

  • Formal vendor training
  • Internal training program
  • Self-taught (docs/videos)
  • Peer coaching/mentoring
  • External consultant
  • No formal training
Q27
Dropdown

Approximately how many people on your typical matter team use the e-discovery tool?

  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21–50
  • 51+
  • Varies significantly

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Purpose-built for the EDRM lifecycle, covering ingestion/processing, search/filtering, review, and production as distinct usability checkpoints rather than a single generic usability score
  • Includes role, platform, matter-type, and organizational firmographic questions so results can be segmented by litigation support role, org type, and team size
  • Combines structured opinion-scale, ranking, and multiple-choice questions with two open-text prompts and an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into a respondent's specific frustrating moments and tool-change requests
  • Pairs quantitative usability ratings (satisfaction, performance, recommend-likelihood) with qualitative detail on issues encountered and how users learned the tool, giving both benchmarking and narrative insight

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template | Sample Survey, Examples, Questions & Questionnaires

This is a generic, industry-agnostic System Usability Scale (SUS) template rather than anything built for e-discovery or legal workflows specifically. It's useful as a general usability-scoring instrument but would require heavy customization to capture EDRM-stage pain points, matter types, or platform-specific issues. It reads as a static questionnaire template rather than a fielding-ready, domain-specific assessment.

What it does well

  • Based on the well-established, validated SUS methodology for measuring perceived usability
  • Simple, short format that's easy to field quickly across any software product
  • Produces a standardized usability score that's comparable across studies

Where it falls short

  • Not tailored to e-discovery workflows, EDRM stages, or legal-industry terminology
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual pain points or frustrating moments
  • No mechanism for guided screen-share tasks, automated per-response quality scoring, or auto-generated reporting

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Privacy & Compliance

Data Access Request (DSAR) Experience & Expectations Survey

Measures consumer experiences with data subject access requests and expectations around response timelines, suitable for organizations assessing GDPR/CCPA compliance perceptions and identifying friction points in the DSAR process.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Participant Preferences for Anonymized Data Sharing & Licensing

Measures research participants' comfort with anonymized data sharing, preferred licensing models, repository preferences, and required safeguards. Designed for IRB-compliant studies where researchers need informed consent data on secondary data use.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Data Retention Policy Comprehension & Usability Survey

Measures how well users understand your data retention policy, evaluates the discoverability and usability of retention-related controls, and identifies preferred communication formats to inform UX and compliance improvements.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Vendor DPA Clarity & Negotiability Assessment

An internal assessment for privacy, legal, and procurement professionals to evaluate the clarity, negotiability, and workflow efficiency of vendor Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), identifying bottlenecks and improvement priorities.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

Dark Pattern Acceptability & Transparency Trust Survey

Measures consumer reactions to common dark-pattern design tactics and transparency preferences, providing actionable data on trust drivers for UX and product teams.

View template
Privacy & Compliance

AI Contract Review & Redlining Adoption Survey

Measures legal professionals' adoption levels, satisfaction, barriers, and safeguard requirements for AI-assisted contract review and redlining. Designed for legal operations, in-house teams, and law firm practitioners.

View template