All templates
Industry-Specific

End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey

Captures how students experienced a class — clarity of instruction, pacing, workload, and what actually helped them learn — then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors and departments who want more than a satisfaction number at term's end.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

11 questions · ~6 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on (Replace with class name). Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your answers help shape how this course runs next time and will be reviewed after grades are finalized. This takes about 5 minutes. (Template note: replace the class name placeholder before launching.)

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How many of the class sessions did you attend in person or watch live?

  • All or nearly all
  • Most
  • About half
  • A few
  • None
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied are you with this class?

Scale: 17
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q04
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree with each statement about this class?

5 rows × 5 columns
  • The instructor explained concepts clearly
  • The pace of the class matched my ability to keep up
  • Course materials (readings, slides, assignments) helped me learn
  • I felt comfortable asking questions or participating
  • Feedback on assignments or exams was timely and useful
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
Multiple ChoiceRequired

In the last month, which part of the class contributed most to your learning?

  • Lectures
  • In-class discussions or activities
  • Assignments or homework
  • Group work or projects
  • Office hours or extra help
  • Readings or course materials
Q06
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

Looking at these aspects of the class, which most and least urgently need improvement?

  • Pace of lectures
  • Amount of homework or assignments
  • Clarity of grading criteria
  • Availability of the instructor for help
  • Relevance of content to real-world skills
  • Quality of course materials
  • Opportunities for discussion or participation
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most urgently needs improvementWorst:Least urgently needs improvement
Q07
Rating ScaleRequired

How would you rate the overall workload for this class?

Range: 15
Min:Far too lightMax:Far too heavy
Q08
AI Interview

Reconstruct a specific moment or assignment that most shaped the respondent's overall satisfaction rating — ask them to walk through what happened, what the instructor or materials did well or poorly, and how it affected their learning. If they flagged a low-agreement item in the statement ratings (pacing, feedback timeliness, clarity), probe that concretely with an example. If workload was rated as too heavy or too light, ask what specifically they'd cut or add.

Q09
Long Text

What's one specific change that would have made this class better for you?

Q10
Multiple Choice

What is your class standing?

  • First-year
  • Second-year
  • Third-year
  • Fourth-year
  • Graduate student
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Message

That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback! Your responses will be combined with your classmates' answers to help improve how this course is taught going forward.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score with a matrix of agreement statements plus a dedicated workload rating and attendance/standing questions for segmentation
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the specific moment or assignment that most shaped a student's overall rating, not just capture the rating itself
  • Includes a max-diff exercise to prioritize which aspects of the class most urgently need improvement, giving instructors a ranked action list instead of open-ended guesses
  • Closes with a specific 'what one change would help' long-text question, so qualitative feedback is targeted rather than generic

Jotform

Course Feedback Form Template

A static, customizable course feedback form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. It's fielding-ready but relies on fixed question sets with no mechanism to probe deeper into any individual response. Good for quick deployment and basic reporting, not for uncovering the reasoning behind a rating.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready template with drag-and-drop customization
  • Wide range of field types and integrations typical of Jotform's builder
  • Easy to embed or share across common LMS/email workflows

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same static fields
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent AI prompt methodology, since there's no AI interview component

Typeform

Class Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style static form using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UI to collect class feedback. It's polished and fielding-ready, but the conversational feel is purely visual — there's no actual dynamic interviewing based on what a student answers. Best suited for simple satisfaction pulses rather than deep diagnostic feedback.

What it does well

  • Clean, high-completion-rate UI with one-question-at-a-time flow
  • Fielding-ready and easy to customize without technical setup
  • Familiar branding and design polish for student-facing surveys

Where it falls short

  • No true adaptive AI follow-up — question order and content are fixed regardless of answers
  • No voice interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated scoring of response quality or auto-generated analytical reports

QuestionPro

Course evaluation & improvement survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

This is primarily a question-bank/guide page listing sample course evaluation questions rather than a single ready-to-field template. It's useful as a reference for building a survey manually, but it doesn't ship as an interactive, adaptive instrument. Reporting and analysis would need to be configured separately in QuestionPro's platform.

What it does well

  • Broad library of sample course-evaluation questions across common categories
  • Backed by an established survey platform with standard analytics tooling
  • Useful as a reference/checklist for departments designing their own evaluation

Where it falls short

  • Presented as a question bank/guide rather than a single ready-to-deploy adaptive template
  • No adaptive AI interview to probe the specific moment behind a rating
  • No published methodology for how any AI-assisted features (if used) generate or score results

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “End-of-Class Feedback and Course Improvement Survey” template?

The template includes 11 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on (Replace with class name). Your responses are completely con…” · “How many of the class sessions did you attend in person or watch live?” · “Overall, how satisfied are you with this class?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 11 questions in about 6 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Industry-Specific

Esthetician Client Skin Intake & History Survey

A pre-appointment intake for estheticians and skincare studios that captures skin type, concerns, allergies, contraindications, and treatment goals before a first visit — with an AI follow-up that digs into any past reactions or unclear answers so the esthetician walks in fully briefed instead of re-asking basics on the table.

View template
Industry-Specific

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

View template
Industry-Specific

Online Course Feedback & Completion Survey

Captures how learners experienced an online course — content clarity, pacing, instructor delivery, and completion barriers — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment a learner struggled, disengaged, or nearly dropped out. Built for course creators, instructional designers, and academic teams reviewing a cohort or module.

View template
Industry-Specific

Post-Lecture Feedback & Teaching Quality Survey

Captures how clear, well-paced, and engaging a lecture was, plus which specific aspects (pacing, examples, Q&A, materials) students most want improved. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete moment the student found confusing or engaging, turning vague 'it was fine' ratings into specifics an instructor can act on.

View template
Industry-Specific

Online Training Course Feedback Survey

Captures how learners actually experienced an online training course — completion, content quality, instructor clarity, and confidence applying the material — for L&D teams and course designers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real obstacles behind low satisfaction or recommendation scores instead of settling for a bare number.

View template
Industry-Specific

College Experience & Satisfaction Feedback Survey

Measures how satisfied students are with instruction, advising, facilities, and support services this term, and what the college should prioritize improving next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each student's recommendation score, surfacing specific incidents and unmet needs that closed-ended ratings miss. Built for academic affairs and student experience teams.

View template