All templates
Research

Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment

Assesses experimentation program maturity across culture, process, tooling, governance, and outcomes. Designed for product, growth, and data teams to benchmark capabilities and identify improvement priorities.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

32 questions · ~13 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment. This survey evaluates how your team and organization approach experimentation — covering process, tooling, governance, and outcomes. Your responses will help benchmark maturity and identify areas for improvement. • Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest perspective. • All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. • Estimated completion time: 10–12 minutes. Please proceed to begin.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Which function best describes your primary role?

  • Product management
  • Growth / performance marketing
  • Lifecycle / CRM
  • Brand / creative marketing
  • Data / analytics
  • Engineering
  • Design / UX
  • Other (please specify)
Q03
Opinion Scale

Over the past 6 months, how would you rate the overall rigor of your team's experiment hypotheses?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all rigorousMax:Extremely rigorous
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which experimentation tools or platforms does your team currently use? (Select all that apply)

  • Optimizely
  • VWO
  • AB Tasty
  • Statsig
  • Eppo
  • Amplitude Experiment
  • LaunchDarkly or Flagsmith
  • Google Optimize (legacy)
  • In-house / custom platform
  • None currently
  • Other (please specify)
Q05
Ranking

When deciding whether to ship a winning variant, rank these factors by importance to your team (most important first).

  1. Effect size vs. baseline
  2. Statistical significance or credible interval
  3. Impact on guardrail metrics
  4. Estimated business value
  5. Implementation cost / complexity
  6. Qualitative feedback / UX signals
Drag to rank
Q06
Opinion Scale

Overall, how would you rate the maturity of experimentation in your organization today?

Scale: 17
Min:Very immature / ad-hocMax:Best-in-class
Q07
Long Text

What are the biggest blockers or challenges to effective experimentation in your organization right now?

Q08
Dropdown

What is your seniority level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Director
  • VP
  • C-level
  • Other
Q09
Message

Thank you for completing the Experimentation Maturity Assessment! Your responses will be analyzed in aggregate to produce benchmarking insights. If you opted in, results will be shared with participants once the analysis is complete. If you have any questions, please contact the research team at the email provided in your invitation.

Q10
Dropdown

Approximately how many people on your team are directly involved in experimentation?

  • 1
  • 2–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21–50
  • 51+
Q11
Opinion Scale

Our team documents a clear hypothesis for every experiment before launch.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q12
Multiple Choice

How are experiment datasets integrated with your analytics and data warehouse?

  • Fully integrated with analytics and warehouse
  • Partial integration; some manual pulls required
  • Isolated within the experimentation tool only
  • I don't know
Q13
Multiple Choice

Which risk controls does your team typically apply to experiments? (Select all that apply)

  • Guardrail metrics monitored
  • Kill switches / instant rollback
  • Ethics / privacy review when needed
  • Traffic allocation caps
  • Country / segment exclusions
  • QA and instrumentation checklist
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
Dropdown

Typically, how many business days elapse between a test ending and a final decision being made?

  • Same day
  • 1–2 days
  • 3–5 days
  • 6–10 days
  • 11–20 days
  • Over 20 days
  • We don't track this
Q15
AI Interview

Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your experimentation challenges and aspirations in a bit more depth.

Q16
Dropdown

Approximately how many employees are in your company?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
Q17
Multiple Choice

In the last 90 days, approximately how many experiments did your team launch?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21+
Q18
Opinion Scale

We have a clear prioritization framework for deciding which experiments to run.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q19
Multiple Choice

Do you have a defined and versioned metrics catalog for experiments?

  • Yes, centrally defined and versioned
  • Yes, team-specific only
  • In progress
  • No
Q20
Multiple Choice

Is there an experimentation council or governance body at your organization?

  • Yes, org-wide
  • Yes, within my business unit
  • No, but being considered
  • No
Q21
Multiple Choice

In the last 6 months, approximately what share of completed experiments led to a production rollout?

  • 0–10%
  • 11–25%
  • 26–40%
  • 41–60%
  • 61–80%
  • 81–100%
  • We don't track this
Q22
Dropdown

Which industry best describes your organization?

  • Consumer software
  • B2B / SaaS
  • E-commerce / retail
  • Financial services / fintech
  • Media / entertainment
  • Healthcare / life sciences
  • Gaming
  • Telecom
  • Travel / hospitality
  • Other (please specify)
Q23
Multiple Choice

What are the primary objectives your experiments target? (Select up to 5)

  • Conversion rate
  • Retention / churn
  • Engagement
  • Monetization / revenue
  • Activation / onboarding
  • Acquisition / traffic
  • Feature adoption
  • Pricing / packaging
  • Brand / creative effectiveness
  • Learning about user behavior
  • Other (please specify)
Q24
Opinion Scale

Experiment designs and analysis plans are peer-reviewed before launch.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q25
Multiple Choice

How does your team typically determine sample size and test duration?

  • Fixed-horizon power analysis
  • Sequential testing / alpha spending
  • Heuristics or benchmarks
  • Vendor tool auto-calculates
  • We usually don't calculate this
  • I don't know
  • Other (please specify)
Q26
Multiple Choice

Where are experiment plans and results typically documented? (Select all that apply)

  • Central system of record
  • Team wiki or docs
  • Within the testing tool
  • Spreadsheets
  • Not consistently documented
  • Other (please specify)
Q27
Dropdown

Where are you primarily based?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Oceania
Q28
Opinion Scale

Learnings from experiments are shared broadly and inform future decisions across teams.

Scale: 17
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q29
Dropdown

How many years have you worked with experimentation or A/B testing?

  • Less than 1
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11+
Q30
Multiple Choice

Which test or study types does your team run regularly? (Select all that apply)

  • A/B or split tests
  • Multivariate tests (MVT)
  • Holdout / control tests
  • Quasi-experiments / observational studies
  • Multi-armed bandits
  • Sequential tests
  • UX / usability studies
  • Surveys / concept tests
  • Feature-flag rollouts / experiments
  • Other (please specify)
Q31
Dropdown

What is the typical runtime for a single experiment, from launch to decision?

  • Same day
  • 1–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • Over 4 weeks
  • Varies widely
Q32
Ranking

Rank the following phases by where your team spends the most effort in a typical experiment (most effort first).

  1. Ideation / prioritization
  2. Design, UX, and copy
  3. Instrumentation and data quality
  4. Implementation / engineering
  5. QA and launch
  6. Monitoring during run
  7. Analysis and interpretation
  8. Documentation and sharing
  9. Rollout and follow-up
Drag to rank

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment” template?

The template includes 32 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment. This survey evaluates how your team and organization…” · “Which function best describes your primary role?” · “Over the past 6 months, how would you rate the overall rigor of your team's experiment hypotheses?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 32 questions in about 13 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Research

2026 Midterm Voter Issue Priorities Survey

A nonpartisan pulse-check on what's driving voters ahead of the 2026 midterms: which issues matter most, how affordability is hitting household budgets, what qualities voters want in a candidate, and how likely they are to turn out. An AI follow-up digs into the concrete, personal reason behind each respondent's top issue instead of a generic label.

View template
Research

Experimentation Maturity & Data Trust Assessment

Measures A/B testing ease-of-use, guardrail adoption, result trust, and decision confidence among product and engineering teams. Use it to identify friction points, governance gaps, and training needs to scale experimentation.

View template
Research

A/B Experimentation Trust & Data Quality Assessment

An internal diagnostic survey for teams that run or consume A/B tests, measuring trust in experiment results, identifying sources of flakiness, and prioritizing process and tooling improvements.

View template
Research

Early Adopter Identification & Trial Tolerance Assessment

Identifies early adopter segments by measuring problem severity, experimentation behavior, bug tolerance, and adoption influence. Use with prospective beta testers or tool evaluation panels to prioritize product roadmap and recruit champions.

View template
Research

Beta Program Experience & Value Assessment

Measures beta testers' onboarding ease, feedback loop quality, and perceived product value to guide pre-GA improvements and adoption priorities.

View template
Research

MMM Readiness & Data Governance Assessment

Evaluates an organization's Marketing Mix Modeling maturity across data foundations, governance practices, validation methods, and resourcing. Designed for marketing, analytics, and media professionals involved in or planning MMM initiatives.

View template