Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment
Assesses experimentation program maturity across culture, process, tooling, governance, and outcomes. Designed for product, growth, and data teams to benchmark capabilities and identify improvement priorities.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which function best describes your primary role?
- Product management
- Growth / performance marketing
- Lifecycle / CRM
- Brand / creative marketing
- Data / analytics
- Engineering
- Design / UX
- Other (please specify)
Over the past 6 months, how would you rate the overall rigor of your team's experiment hypotheses?
Which experimentation tools or platforms does your team currently use? (Select all that apply)
- Optimizely
- VWO
- AB Tasty
- Statsig
- Eppo
- Amplitude Experiment
- LaunchDarkly or Flagsmith
- Google Optimize (legacy)
- In-house / custom platform
- None currently
- Other (please specify)
When deciding whether to ship a winning variant, rank these factors by importance to your team (most important first).
- Effect size vs. baseline
- Statistical significance or credible interval
- Impact on guardrail metrics
- Estimated business value
- Implementation cost / complexity
- Qualitative feedback / UX signals
Overall, how would you rate the maturity of experimentation in your organization today?
What are the biggest blockers or challenges to effective experimentation in your organization right now?
What is your seniority level?
- Individual contributor
- Manager
- Director
- VP
- C-level
- Other
Thank you for completing the Experimentation Maturity Assessment! Your responses will be analyzed in aggregate to produce benchmarking insights. If you opted in, results will be shared with participants once the analysis is complete. If you have any questions, please contact the research team at the email provided in your invitation.
Approximately how many people on your team are directly involved in experimentation?
- 1
- 2–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21–50
- 51+
Our team documents a clear hypothesis for every experiment before launch.
How are experiment datasets integrated with your analytics and data warehouse?
- Fully integrated with analytics and warehouse
- Partial integration; some manual pulls required
- Isolated within the experimentation tool only
- I don't know
Which risk controls does your team typically apply to experiments? (Select all that apply)
- Guardrail metrics monitored
- Kill switches / instant rollback
- Ethics / privacy review when needed
- Traffic allocation caps
- Country / segment exclusions
- QA and instrumentation checklist
- None of the above
- Other (please specify)
Typically, how many business days elapse between a test ending and a final decision being made?
- Same day
- 1–2 days
- 3–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–20 days
- Over 20 days
- We don't track this
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your experimentation challenges and aspirations in a bit more depth.
Approximately how many employees are in your company?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–10,000
- 10,001+
In the last 90 days, approximately how many experiments did your team launch?
- 0
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21+
We have a clear prioritization framework for deciding which experiments to run.
Do you have a defined and versioned metrics catalog for experiments?
- Yes, centrally defined and versioned
- Yes, team-specific only
- In progress
- No
Is there an experimentation council or governance body at your organization?
- Yes, org-wide
- Yes, within my business unit
- No, but being considered
- No
In the last 6 months, approximately what share of completed experiments led to a production rollout?
- 0–10%
- 11–25%
- 26–40%
- 41–60%
- 61–80%
- 81–100%
- We don't track this
Which industry best describes your organization?
- Consumer software
- B2B / SaaS
- E-commerce / retail
- Financial services / fintech
- Media / entertainment
- Healthcare / life sciences
- Gaming
- Telecom
- Travel / hospitality
- Other (please specify)
What are the primary objectives your experiments target? (Select up to 5)
- Conversion rate
- Retention / churn
- Engagement
- Monetization / revenue
- Activation / onboarding
- Acquisition / traffic
- Feature adoption
- Pricing / packaging
- Brand / creative effectiveness
- Learning about user behavior
- Other (please specify)
Experiment designs and analysis plans are peer-reviewed before launch.
How does your team typically determine sample size and test duration?
- Fixed-horizon power analysis
- Sequential testing / alpha spending
- Heuristics or benchmarks
- Vendor tool auto-calculates
- We usually don't calculate this
- I don't know
- Other (please specify)
Where are experiment plans and results typically documented? (Select all that apply)
- Central system of record
- Team wiki or docs
- Within the testing tool
- Spreadsheets
- Not consistently documented
- Other (please specify)
Where are you primarily based?
- North America
- Latin America
- Europe
- Middle East
- Africa
- Asia
- Oceania
Learnings from experiments are shared broadly and inform future decisions across teams.
How many years have you worked with experimentation or A/B testing?
- Less than 1
- 1–3
- 4–6
- 7–10
- 11+
Which test or study types does your team run regularly? (Select all that apply)
- A/B or split tests
- Multivariate tests (MVT)
- Holdout / control tests
- Quasi-experiments / observational studies
- Multi-armed bandits
- Sequential tests
- UX / usability studies
- Surveys / concept tests
- Feature-flag rollouts / experiments
- Other (please specify)
What is the typical runtime for a single experiment, from launch to decision?
- Same day
- 1–3 days
- 4–7 days
- 1–2 weeks
- 3–4 weeks
- Over 4 weeks
- Varies widely
Rank the following phases by where your team spends the most effort in a typical experiment (most effort first).
- Ideation / prioritization
- Design, UX, and copy
- Instrumentation and data quality
- Implementation / engineering
- QA and launch
- Monitoring during run
- Analysis and interpretation
- Documentation and sharing
- Rollout and follow-up
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment” template?
The template includes 32 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Experimentation & A/B Testing Maturity Assessment. This survey evaluates how your team and organization…” · “Which function best describes your primary role?” · “Over the past 6 months, how would you rate the overall rigor of your team's experiment hypotheses?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 32 questions in about 13 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
2026 Midterm Voter Issue Priorities Survey
A nonpartisan pulse-check on what's driving voters ahead of the 2026 midterms: which issues matter most, how affordability is hitting household budgets, what qualities voters want in a candidate, and how likely they are to turn out. An AI follow-up digs into the concrete, personal reason behind each respondent's top issue instead of a generic label.
View templateExperimentation Maturity & Data Trust Assessment
Measures A/B testing ease-of-use, guardrail adoption, result trust, and decision confidence among product and engineering teams. Use it to identify friction points, governance gaps, and training needs to scale experimentation.
View templateA/B Experimentation Trust & Data Quality Assessment
An internal diagnostic survey for teams that run or consume A/B tests, measuring trust in experiment results, identifying sources of flakiness, and prioritizing process and tooling improvements.
View templateEarly Adopter Identification & Trial Tolerance Assessment
Identifies early adopter segments by measuring problem severity, experimentation behavior, bug tolerance, and adoption influence. Use with prospective beta testers or tool evaluation panels to prioritize product roadmap and recruit champions.
View templateBeta Program Experience & Value Assessment
Measures beta testers' onboarding ease, feedback loop quality, and perceived product value to guide pre-GA improvements and adoption priorities.
View templateMMM Readiness & Data Governance Assessment
Evaluates an organization's Marketing Mix Modeling maturity across data foundations, governance practices, validation methods, and resourcing. Designed for marketing, analytics, and media professionals involved in or planning MMM initiatives.
View template