All templates

Feature Retirement Risk & Migration Readiness Survey

Assesses user dependency, workaround patterns, and transition readiness before sunsetting a product feature. Designed for product teams making data-driven go/no-go retirement decisions.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

17 questions · ~8 min
Q01
Message

Welcome, and thank you for participating! This short survey (approximately 9 minutes) asks about your experience with Feature X. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to inform product planning decisions. Participation is entirely voluntary — you may skip any question or stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we simply want your honest perspective. Please answer based on your current, real-world experience with Feature X.

Q02
Multiple Choice

In the past 30 days, have you used Feature X?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
Opinion Scale

How central is Feature X to your primary day-to-day workflow?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all centralMax:Absolutely essential
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which workarounds or alternatives do you currently use when Feature X falls short? (Select all that apply)

  • Manual steps or spreadsheets
  • Third-party product
  • API or custom scripts
  • Another feature in this product
  • Ask a teammate for help
  • Avoid the task entirely
  • None — Feature X meets my needs
Q05
Dropdown

If Feature X were retired, what would you primarily switch to?

  • Another feature in this product
  • My own manual process
  • A different product or vendor
  • Custom scripts or API
  • Not sure
  • Other
Q06
AI Interview

Based on your responses, is there anything else we should understand about how Feature X fits into your work, or any concerns about its potential retirement?

Q07
Dropdown

Which role best describes you?

  • Product management
  • Engineering / Development
  • Design / UX
  • Data / Analytics
  • Operations
  • Customer support
  • Executive / Leadership
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
Message

Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly inform our planning process. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact [support channel].

Q09
Dropdown

Approximately how often did you use Feature X in the past 30 days?

  • Once or twice
  • A few times (3–5 days)
  • About weekly (6–10 days)
  • Several times a week (11–20 days)
  • Daily or near-daily (21–30 days)
Q10
Opinion Scale

If Feature X were removed in 60 days, how disruptive would that be to your work?

Scale: 17
Min:No disruption at allMax:Extremely disruptive
Q11
Opinion Scale

How much additional effort do these workarounds add to your work?

Scale: 15
Min:No extra effortMax:Significant extra effort
Q12
Dropdown

How much time would you need to fully adapt without Feature X?

  • Same day
  • 1–3 days
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 1–2 months
  • 3+ months
Q13
Dropdown

How long have you used this product?

  • Less than 1 month
  • 1–3 months
  • 4–6 months
  • 7–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
Multiple Choice

What are the main reasons you have not used Feature X recently? (Select all that apply)

  • Didn't need it for my tasks
  • Wasn't aware of it
  • Found it hard to use
  • Performance or reliability issues
  • Another tool replaces it for me
  • No longer part of my role
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
Multiple Choice

What resources or support would you need for a smooth transition away from Feature X? (Select all that apply)

  • Bulk export of my data
  • Mapping or compatibility guide
  • Suggested alternative workflows
  • Templates or scripts
  • Advance communication or notice period
  • Dedicated support channel
  • No additional support needed
  • Other (please specify)
Q16
Dropdown

Approximately how many employees does your organization have?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
Dropdown

Which industry best describes your organization?

  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Education
  • Retail
  • Manufacturing
  • Government / Non-profit
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes usage-frequency and workaround-mapping questions specifically designed to quantify dependency on a feature slated for retirement, not just general satisfaction
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended context on how people actually rely on the feature, going beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Captures transition readiness directly (time needed to adapt, resources needed, likely replacement) so the results map to a go/no-go retirement decision
  • Segments responses by role, tenure, org size, and industry so product teams can see which cohorts are most at risk before sunsetting the feature

SurveyMonkey

Product Feature Survey Template

A general-purpose static template for gathering feedback on a product feature, likely covering satisfaction and usefulness rather than retirement-specific risk. It's a ready-to-field form but not tailored to dependency, workaround, or migration-readiness analysis. Best suited for feature feedback rather than a sunset decision.

What it does well

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's large-scale survey infrastructure and easy distribution
  • Quick to deploy for general feature feedback
  • Familiar, simple respondent experience

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe individual dependency or workaround patterns
  • Not structured around retirement risk, disruption scoring, or transition timelines
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

Typeform

Product Readiness Assessment by Smartbug Media

A conversational-style readiness assessment focused on general product readiness rather than feature-specific retirement risk or migration planning. It offers Typeform's polished UI but appears to be a fixed-question flow without adaptive probing. Useful as a broad readiness check, not as a targeted go/no-go retirement tool.

What it does well

  • Clean, conversational form design typical of Typeform templates
  • Good for capturing general readiness sentiment quickly
  • Easy to customize branding and question wording

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into why users depend on a specific feature
  • Not designed to quantify workaround effort or disruption if a feature is removed
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated retirement-decision report

QuestionPro

Product Evaluation Survey Template and Sample Questionnaire

A broad product evaluation template aimed at assessing overall satisfaction and feature usefulness, not specifically at retirement risk or transition planning. It's a fielding-ready static questionnaire with sample questions, useful for general evaluation but not for measuring dependency or migration readiness. Good starting point if adapted heavily, but not purpose-built for sunset decisions.

What it does well

  • Sample questionnaire provides a solid baseline for general product evaluation
  • Established survey platform with analytics and reporting tools
  • Supports multiple question types for broad feedback collection

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI or voice interview capability to explore individual workaround reasoning
  • No built-in framework for scoring disruption risk or adaptation time before a retirement decision
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology for any AI-assisted analysis

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.