Q01
Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Fun Run Registration Experience & Pricing Survey
Captures why participants signed up for your fun run, how smooth the online registration and payment process felt, and what entry fee feels fair to them — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific friction points behind low ease-of-registration ratings. Built for race organizers and event marketers refining sign-up flow, communications, and pricing.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
13 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
How did you first hear about (Replace with your event name)?
- Social media
- Email newsletter
- Friend or family member
- Race listing website
- Previous participation in this event
- Other
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which race distance or category did you register for? (Template note: replace with your own event's distances/categories before launching.)
- 5K
- 10K
- Half marathon
- Kids fun run
- Virtual/remote option
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired
What motivated you to sign up for this race? Select all that apply.
- Supporting the cause or charity
- A personal fitness goal
- A social event with friends or family
- A competitive challenge
- The costume/theme or overall fun factor
- Other
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired
How easy was it to complete the online registration process?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
MatrixRequired
How would you rate each part of the registration experience?
5 rows × 5 columns
- Payment process
- Confirmation email
- Website or app navigation
- Clarity of race day logistics (start time, parking, etc.)
- Value for the entry fee
Columns: Poor · Fair · Good · Very good · Excellent
Q07
Price Sensitivity (Van Westendorp)
Thinking about the entry fee for this race, please answer honestly based on what you'd realistically pay.
- At what entry fee would this race feel like such a bargain that you'd question its quality or safety?
- At what entry fee would this race feel like a great deal for what you get?
- At what entry fee would this race start to feel expensive, though you might still register?
- At what entry fee would this race feel too expensive for you to consider registering?
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to recommend this event to a friend or family member?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q09
AI Interview
Probe the specific reasons behind the respondent's ease-of-registration rating: if it was low, pin down exactly where they got stuck (payment, confusing form fields, unclear distance options, technical errors) and what they expected instead. If it was high, ask what stood out as especially smooth. Also briefly explore how they arrived at the price they'd consider 'too expensive' for this race — what comparison or expectation drove that number.
Q10
Multiple Choice
Is this your first time participating in this event?
- Yes, first time
- No, I've participated before
Q11
Multiple Choice
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Message
That's everything — thank you for the feedback! We'll use your answers to smooth out the registration process and set fair pricing for future races. See you at the start line!
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a Van Westendorp pricing question so organizers get a defensible 'fair entry fee' range, not just a single price guess.
- Pairs an ease-of-registration opinion scale and a matrix rating of each registration step with an AI follow-up interview that automatically digs into the specific friction points behind any low ease ratings.
- Captures the full sign-up funnel story in one flow: how participants heard about the race, what motivated them to register, satisfaction with the process, and likelihood to recommend.
- Delivers an auto-generated report summarizing registration pain points and pricing sentiment, versus raw response exports.
SurveyMonkey
Workshop Registration Form TemplateThis is a static intake form for collecting workshop sign-ups (name, contact, session choice), not a post-registration feedback or pricing survey. It's fielding-ready for capturing registrations but isn't built to diagnose friction points or test entry-fee sensitivity. Useful as a generic registration-form starting point rather than a purpose-built race registration experience survey.
What it does well
- Simple, quick-to-deploy form builder backed by an established survey platform
- Easy to customize fields for session/workshop selection
- Familiar interface for respondents already used to SurveyMonkey forms
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up — can't automatically probe why a respondent rated registration poorly
- No pricing-sensitivity question (e.g., Van Westendorp) to establish a fair fee
- Static question set with no automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated insight report
SurveySparrow
Event Registration Form Template: Collect Registrations and Manage Attendees OnlineThis is an attendee sign-up/management form for events generally, focused on collecting registrations rather than evaluating how the registration experience felt or what price feels fair. It's fielding-ready for intake but not designed as a post-registration diagnostic survey. Race organizers would need to build a separate feedback instrument on top of it.
What it does well
- Conversational form format that can feel more engaging than a plain web form
- Built for managing attendee data across event types
- Part of a broader survey suite with reporting dashboards
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interview to follow up on low satisfaction or ease-of-registration scores
- No structured pricing-sensitivity question like Van Westendorp for entry-fee testing
- Prompt-level methodology (if any conversational logic is used) isn't published, unlike QuestionPunk's transparent prompts
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Fun Run Registration Experience & Pricing Survey” template?
The template includes 13 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for registering! We'd love your quick feedback on the sign-up experience so we can make it even better for next t…” · “How did you first hear about (Replace with your event name)?” · “Which race distance or category did you register for? (Template note: replace with your own event's distances/categories…”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 13 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Industry-Specific
Politician Statement Reaction & Credibility Survey
Captures how a specific statement from a public official lands with real people — whether they'd heard it, how they interpret it, and what it does to their trust. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reaction, surfacing the specific words or context driving approval, skepticism, or backlash.
View templateIndustry-Specific
5K Run Registration & Participant Experience Survey
Captures why runners signed up for your 5K, how smooth their registration felt, and which race-day logistics matter most to them — built for race directors, event marketers, and charity partners planning future runs. The AI follow-up digs into any registration friction and the real motivation behind the signup, not just the option they clicked.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Sports Program Registration Experience Survey
Measures how smooth (or frustrating) the sign-up process was for a sports league, camp, or class, what actually drives program choice, and how participants perceive the registration fee — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific moment registration got confusing or almost led to abandonment.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Basketball League Registration Experience Survey
Captures how smooth, clear, and fairly priced your basketball program's registration process felt to parents and players, from signup through payment. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment things got confusing or frustrating, so you can fix drop-off points before next season's signups open.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Non-Profit Event Participation & Experience Survey
Captures how attendees discovered, experienced, and valued your fundraising or community event, plus what would bring them back or keep them away. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall impression, giving program teams concrete detail beyond a satisfaction score.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Course Registration Experience Survey
Measures how smoothly students moved through course registration — from system usability to getting into desired classes — for registrars, advising offices, and student success teams. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment registration broke down for each student, surfacing fixable friction that a satisfaction score alone can't explain.
View template