Leadership Alignment on AI Strategy Pulse Check
A short pulse check for executive and senior leadership teams that surfaces where AI strategy is genuinely shared versus quietly contested — covering clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or disagreement behind the lowest-rated alignment statement instead of settling for a vague 'somewhat aligned' score.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
How clear is our organization's AI strategy to you personally?
How much do you agree with each of the following statements about our leadership team's alignment on AI?
- Leadership agrees on the top 2-3 AI use cases to prioritize
- We've allocated sufficient budget to execute our AI plans
- Roles and decision rights for AI initiatives are clear
- We have a shared view of acceptable AI risk and governance
- Leadership communicates a consistent AI narrative to the rest of the organization
Which of these AI investment areas matter most for our strategy right now?
- Customer experience & engagement
- Internal productivity & automation
- New product or revenue innovation
- Risk, compliance & governance
- Talent capability & AI literacy
- Data & infrastructure readiness
- Competitive differentiation
If you had 100 points of budget to allocate across these AI-related priorities for the next 12 months, how would you split them?
- Customer-facing AI products/features
- Internal productivity & automation tools
- Data & infrastructure investment
- Risk, compliance & governance
- Talent, training & change management
Which best describes our organization's current stage of AI adoption?
- Exploring / early pilots only
- Scaling a few proven use cases
- AI embedded in core workflows
- Still mostly conceptual / no active projects
- Not sure
How confident are you that we'll achieve our stated AI strategy goals in the next 12 months?
What's the biggest barrier to better leadership alignment on AI right now? (Select up to two)
- Unclear or competing business priorities
- Insufficient budget or resources
- Unclear ownership / decision rights
- Gaps in AI skills or literacy on the leadership team
- Data or technical readiness
- Differing risk tolerance across leaders
- Lack of a shared success metric
Identify which alignment statement the respondent rated lowest and probe concretely: what specific decision, budget line, or use case is leadership actually disagreeing about, who holds the opposing view, and how it connects to the barrier they selected. If they rated everything highly, stress-test that by asking for a recent example where leadership's AI priorities visibly conflicted. Close by asking what decision needs to get made in the next 30 days to move alignment forward.
What is the one decision our leadership team needs to make about AI in the next quarter that we keep avoiding or delaying?
Which best describes your role level?
- C-suite / executive leadership
- Senior VP / VP
- Director
- Senior manager
- Other leadership role
- Prefer not to say
Which function do you primarily represent?
- Technology / Engineering
- Product
- Operations
- Finance
- Marketing / Sales
- HR / People
- Legal / Risk / Compliance
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thanks for your candid input. Responses are aggregated into a leadership alignment report — no individual answers are attributed by name — to help focus our next AI strategy conversation.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Goes beyond generic leadership check-ins by focusing specifically on AI strategy: clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage, using a matrix, max-diff, and constant-sum allocation to surface real trade-off thinking, not just satisfaction scores
- Pinpoints the exact alignment statement each respondent rated lowest and runs an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific decision or disagreement behind it, instead of stopping at a vague 'somewhat aligned' number
- Segments results by role level and function so leadership can see whether misalignment is company-wide or concentrated in specific groups, alongside an open question forcing respondents to name the one AI decision leadership must make next
- Automatically aggregates responses into a leadership alignment report, saving the manual synthesis work that static survey exports require
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Leadership Alignment on AI Strategy Pulse Check” template?
The template includes 13 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to weigh in on where our leadership team stands on AI strategy. This pulse check covers…” · “How clear is our organization's AI strategy to you personally?” · “How much do you agree with each of the following statements about our leadership team's alignment on AI?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 13 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Competitive Perception vs Named Competitors Survey
Benchmarks how customers and prospects rate you against specific named competitors on the criteria that actually drive their choice — combining a max-diff prioritization, a head-to-head perception battery, and an AI follow-up that digs into the exact moment a competitor won or nearly won the deal.
View templateAI Disruption Sentiment Pulse for Transforming Teams
A quick pulse for teams navigating AI-driven change — measuring sentiment, trust in leadership communication, skill-confidence, and the support employees actually want next. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's sentiment score, surfacing specifics a scale alone can't capture.
View templateStrategic Plan Clarity, Alignment, and Execution Survey
Gauges whether employees or leaders understand the organization's strategic priorities, believe resources and daily work are aligned to them, and feel confident execution will succeed — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real barriers behind low-confidence or low-alignment answers.
View templateTeam Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check
Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.
View templateFrontier AI Skills Gap Self-Assessment for Teams
Measures how confident employees feel using frontier AI tools like ChatGPT and Copilot across core workplace skills, where the biggest gaps sit, and what's blocking adoption. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's lowest-confidence skill area, not just the number they picked. Built for HR and L&D teams planning AI training.
View templateAnonymous Employee Feedback & Culture Pulse Survey
A confidential pulse check on communication, recognition, workload, and trust in leadership — for HR and people teams who want honest signal without retaliation fears. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind each person's lowest-rated area, surfacing specifics that a number alone never would.
View template