Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey
Measures how well a mentorship relationship is working for the mentee — guidance quality, meeting consistency, and career impact — with an AI follow-up that digs into a specific moment mentorship helped or fell short, revealing what to fix before the next matching cycle.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the last 3 months, how often have you and your mentor met?
- Not at all
- Once
- 2-3 times
- Monthly or more
- Weekly or more
How well does your mentor understand your specific career goals?
How much do you agree with each statement about your mentor?
- Gives me actionable, specific advice
- Is accessible when I need to reach them
- Challenges me to grow, not just reassures me
- Follows through on commitments made in our sessions
- Helps me build useful connections or visibility
Rank these areas by how much your mentor has helped you in each so far.
- Technical or role-specific skills
- Career navigation and goal-setting
- Confidence and mindset
- Networking and visibility
- Work-life balance and wellbeing
How likely are you to recommend this mentorship program to a colleague?
Overall, has this mentorship relationship met your expectations?
- Far below expectations
- Somewhat below
- Met expectations
- Somewhat above
- Far exceeded expectations
Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent conversation or piece of advice from their mentor that genuinely changed how they approached something at work. Get concrete details: what the advice was, what they did differently, and what the outcome was. If they rated the relationship as below expectations, instead probe the specific moment or pattern that caused disappointment and what they wish had happened instead. Anchor follow-ups on their meeting frequency and 'understands goals' answers.
What's one thing your mentor could do differently to make this relationship more valuable to you?
How long have you been in this mentoring relationship?
- Less than 1 month
- 1-3 months
- 4-6 months
- 7-12 months
- Over a year
Which best describes your role level?
- Entry-level / individual contributor
- Mid-level
- Senior / staff
- Manager or above
- Prefer not to say
That wraps things up — thank you for the honest feedback! Program coordinators will use these responses, alongside your mentor's, to strengthen matching and support going forward.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that asks the mentee to walk through one specific recent conversation or moment, surfacing concrete detail on what worked or fell short.
- Combines structured measurement (meeting frequency, a goals-understanding opinion scale, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and a ranking of help areas) with open-ended reflection, so coordinators get both scorable data and narrative context.
- Captures program-health signals like recommendation likelihood and whether expectations were met, alongside role level and relationship duration, so results can be segmented before the next matching cycle.
- Ends with a clear thank-you and sets expectations that coordinators will review responses, plus a dedicated open text question on what the mentor could do differently.
Jotform
Mentor Evaluation Form TemplateA fielding-ready, customizable form builder template for evaluating mentors, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop editor and integrations. It's a general-purpose form rather than a survey built specifically around mentee-reported career impact. No mention of adaptive follow-up questioning.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use, easily customizable form layout
- Backed by Jotform's broad integration and form-logic ecosystem
- Likely quick to deploy for basic mentor feedback collection
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe specific incidents
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis reports evident
- No transparent, published methodology or prompt logic behind the questions
Typeform
Mentor Evaluation Form TemplateA conversational, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to Typeform's polished UX for mentor feedback. It offers a pleasant respondent experience but appears to be a fixed question flow rather than one that adapts based on answers. Reporting is likely limited to Typeform's standard response summaries.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
- Good completion rates typical of Typeform's UX design
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into a specific mentorship moment
- No voice-based interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
QuestionPro
Non Profit Mentoring Programs Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and guide focused on non-profit mentoring programs rather than a plug-and-play fielding template, so setup work is likely required. It covers broad program-level survey question ideas, which is useful for question inspiration but not tailored to a single mentee's ongoing relationship depth.
What it does well
- Provides example questions specifically framed for mentoring program context
- Backed by QuestionPro's established survey analytics platform
- Useful as a question-writing reference for program administrators
Where it falls short
- Presented as a guide/sample questionnaire, not a ready-to-field interactive survey
- No adaptive AI follow-up or voice interview capability
- No transparent per-question methodology or automated quality scoring
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Mentor Program Effectiveness Evaluation Survey” template?
The template includes 12 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your mentorship experience! This helps us improve matching and support for…” · “In the last 3 months, how often have you and your mentor met?” · “How well does your mentor understand your specific career goals?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 12 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Psychiatric Intake and Symptom Screening Survey
A pre-appointment intake for mental health practices that captures presenting concerns, symptom frequency over the last two weeks, treatment history, and safety screening before the first visit — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the story behind the symptoms (onset, triggers, what's changed) so clinicians walk in with context instead of a blank checklist.
View templateNonprofit Mentoring Program Relationship & Impact Survey
Measures how mentees experience match quality, meeting consistency, and goal progress in a nonprofit mentoring program, with an AI follow-up that digs into why relationships work or stall so program staff can improve matching and support rather than just tallying satisfaction scores.
View templateMentorship Advocacy & Sponsorship Impact Survey
Measures whether a mentorship program is producing real advocacy — introductions, nominations, and sponsorship — not just advice conversations. Built for program owners and L&D teams, with an AI follow-up that surfaces a concrete story of advocacy (or the lack of it) behind the numbers.
View templateVolunteer Mentor Application and Fit Screening Survey
Screens prospective mentors for a formal mentorship program by capturing their expertise areas, availability, self-assessed mentoring skills, and motivations, then uses an AI follow-up interview to probe real coaching experience and test judgment against a realistic difficult-mentee scenario. Built for program coordinators who need more than a resume to predict mentor follow-through and fit.
View templateIntern Feedback and Program Effectiveness Survey
Captures how interns experienced onboarding, mentorship, meaningful work, and team culture, then has them trade off which parts of the program mattered most. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind their overall rating. Built for HR and program leads assessing internship ROI and full-time conversion potential.
View templateTraining Program Effectiveness & Satisfaction Survey
Evaluates how well a training program delivered on content quality, instructor effectiveness, and real-world applicability, including a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in future sessions. An AI follow-up interview digs into whether participants have actually used the skills on the job and what got in the way if not. Built for L&D teams and training providers assessing course impact.
View template