Q01
Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Multiple Intelligences Strengths Self-Assessment
Helps individuals, coaches, and L&D teams identify a person's dominant ways of thinking and learning (word, number, picture, body, music, people, self, and nature smarts), then uses an AI follow-up interview to surface a concrete, real-life example of their top strength in action rather than just a self-rated label.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
12 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Slider MatrixRequired
How often does each of these describe you?
8 rows, one slider each
- I enjoy reading, writing, or playing with words
- I like solving logic puzzles, patterns, or math problems
- I think in pictures and enjoy drawing, designing, or visualizing ideas
- I learn best by moving, building, or doing something hands-on
- I can easily pick up melodies, rhythms, or song lyrics
- +3 more
Slider 0–10Min:Never like meMax:Always like me
Q03
RankingRequired
Rank these ways of thinking and doing from most to least natural for you.
- Word smart (language, writing, storytelling)
- Number/logic smart (reasoning, patterns, math)
- Picture smart (visual and spatial thinking)
- Body smart (movement, hands-on skill)
- Music smart (rhythm, melody, sound)
- People smart (understanding and working with others)
- Self smart (self-awareness and reflection)
- Nature smart (observing and categorizing the natural world)
Drag to rank
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired
In a group project, which role do you gravitate toward first?
- The one who organizes the plan and logic of the task
- The one who sketches, designs, or visualizes the end result
- The one who builds or physically assembles the solution
- The one who keeps the group's morale and communication on track
- The one who works out the details alone before sharing back
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired
How confident are you that you know your own strongest way of thinking or learning?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not confident at allMax:Extremely confident
Q06
AI Interview
Ask the respondent to describe a specific, recent moment when they were doing something that matched their top-ranked way of thinking (referencing their highest-ranked item from the earlier ranking question). Probe for concrete details: what task were they doing, what made it feel effortless or energizing, and how did it differ from a task that drained them. If their ranking and their slider answers point to different top strengths, gently ask them to reconcile the difference.
Q07
Long Text
Is there a skill, hobby, or way of working that you feel doesn't fit neatly into the categories above? Describe it briefly.
Q08
Message
Last part — a few quick background questions to help us understand patterns across different groups. All are optional.
Q09
Multiple Choice
Which best describes your current role or setting?
- Student
- Educator or trainer
- Corporate professional
- Creative or design field
- Healthcare or caregiving
- Trades or hands-on work
- Prefer not to say
Q10
Multiple Choice
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice
What is your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Message
Thank you for taking the time to reflect on how you think and learn! Your answers will be used to build a personalized strengths summary and to spot broader patterns across respondents.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a slider matrix and forced-choice ranking to triangulate self-rated strengths across all eight intelligence types, not just a single quiz score
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to ask respondents to describe a specific, recent moment when their top strength was in action, turning a label into a concrete example
- Captures nuance with an open-ended question about skills or working styles that don't fit neatly into the standard categories, plus a confidence rating on self-knowledge
- Collects role/setting, age range, and gender as background variables so coaches and L&D teams can look for patterns across groups, all wrapped in a conversational chat-message flow
Typeform
Multiple Intelligences Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-field Typeform template covering the classic multiple intelligences framework with Typeform's signature clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface. It's built for self-scoring style assessment rather than deeper qualitative follow-up. Good for quick, polished distribution but stays at the level of fixed-choice questions.
What it does well
- Polished, on-brand conversational form design
- Quick to deploy and share via Typeform's distribution tools
- Mobile-friendly, familiar UX for respondents
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe for a real-life example behind a self-rated strength
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- Static question set with no transparent AI prompt methodology
Jotform
Multiple Intelligence Survey Form TemplateJotform's template offers a straightforward, customizable form for gathering multiple intelligence self-ratings, backed by Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder and integrations. It's a solid fielding-ready static form but relies on fixed question types rather than any conversational or adaptive interviewing. Best suited for teams that just want a quick data-collection form to customize.
What it does well
- Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
- Wide range of integrations (sheets, CRMs, notifications)
- Easy to embed or share as a standalone form
Where it falls short
- No AI-driven follow-up interview or voice interview option
- No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
- No auto-generated narrative reports summarizing individual results
QuestionPro
Multiple Intelligence Survey for Students Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis QuestionPro page is presented as a sample questionnaire and question bank oriented toward students, more of a reference/guide with example questions than a single polished, ready-to-field template. It benefits from QuestionPro's broader survey logic and reporting tools, but the multiple-intelligence content itself is static question examples. Useful for inspiration or building your own survey rather than launching as-is.
What it does well
- Backed by QuestionPro's mature survey logic and reporting suite
- Provides sample questions across intelligence types for reference
- Can be adapted using QuestionPro's broader survey customization options
Where it falls short
- Framed as a question guide/sample rather than a single fielding-ready template
- No adaptive AI interview to surface a concrete example behind a stated strength
- No transparent AI prompt or automated quality-scoring system
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Industry-Specific
Reiki Session Intake & Client Intention Survey
A pre-session intake for reiki and energy healing practitioners that captures a client's physical and emotional state, comfort with touch, and health considerations before hands-on work begins. An AI follow-up interview digs into the client's stated intention so practitioners can tailor the session to what's really driving the visit, not just the surface request.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Conference Speaker & Session Evaluation Survey
Captures how attendees rate a speaker's clarity, expertise, and engagement right after a session, plus whether the content met expectations — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their recommendation score. Built for event organizers, L&D teams, and conference producers deciding which speakers to invite back.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey
Captures how attendees rate a workshop's content, pacing, and facilitator right after it ends, plus how likely they are to recommend it — for training teams and event organizers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's recommendation score, going beyond star ratings to what actually landed or fell flat.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Dance Audition Experience Feedback Survey
Captures how dancers experienced your audition process — from communication and choreography teaching to callback follow-up — so studios, companies, and choreographers can improve turnout and reputation. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind how results and feedback were (or weren't) communicated. Built for dance companies, casting directors, and studio owners running auditions.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Tenant Satisfaction & Lease Renewal Survey
Measures how tenants feel about maintenance, communication, value, and safety at your property, plus what actually drives their renewal decision. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident or trade-off behind their lowest rating instead of settling for a generic complaint.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey
Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.
View template