Online Proposal Experience & Decision Feedback Survey
Captures how recipients experienced a business proposal sent through an online proposal tool — clarity, ease of review, trust signals, and what ultimately drove their decision. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real reasoning behind an accept, decline, or stall, going beyond the surface-level rating. Built for sales, agency, and proposal-software teams who want to improve close rates.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
What was the outcome of the proposal you received?
- I accepted it
- I'm still deciding
- I declined it
- I requested changes before deciding
How did you mainly review the proposal?
- On a desktop or laptop computer
- On a phone
- On a tablet
- Printed it out
How easy was it to navigate and understand the online proposal itself (sections, pricing tables, attachments)?
How clear was the pricing and scope of work laid out in the proposal?
How much do you agree with each statement about the proposal you received?
- It looked professional and well put-together
- It gave me confidence in this company's ability to deliver
- It answered my questions without needing to ask follow-ups
- It made comparing options (packages, add-ons) easy
About how long did it take you to reach a decision after receiving the proposal?
- Same day
- A few days
- About a week
- More than two weeks
- I still haven't decided
Rank the factors below by how much they influenced your decision, from most to least important.
- Price
- Timeline / delivery date
- References or past work shown
- Clarity of scope
- How the proposal looked and felt
- Communication with the sender
Reconstruct the real story behind this respondent's decision: what specifically in the proposal (pricing, scope, timeline, presentation) tipped them toward accepting, declining, or staying undecided. If they requested changes or are still deciding, probe exactly what is missing or unclear and what would need to happen next. Anchor questions on concrete details from the proposal rather than general impressions.
Based on this proposal experience, how likely are you to recommend working with this company to a colleague?
What, if anything, would have made the proposal more compelling or easier to say yes to?
Which best describes your role in this decision?
- Final decision-maker
- Key influencer / recommender
- Evaluating on behalf of someone else
- Other
- Prefer not to say
What's the approximate size of your organization?
- Just me / solo
- 2-10 employees
- 11-50 employees
- 51-200 employees
- 201-1000 employees
- 1000+ employees
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback! Your answers will be used to make future proposals clearer and easier to say yes to.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond a satisfaction rating with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual reasoning behind an accept, decline, or stall — not just what respondents rate, but why.
- Includes a ranking exercise that forces respondents to prioritize the specific factors (price, clarity, trust signals, etc.) that drove their decision, giving sales and proposal teams actionable weightings.
- Pairs structured measures — navigation ease rating, pricing/scope clarity, a multi-statement agreement matrix, and decision-timeline questions — with an open-ended 'what would have made it more compelling' question and a final recommendation score for a full before/after picture.
- Segments by decision role and organization size so proposal-software and agency teams can see whether friction points differ for economic buyers vs. influencers, or SMB vs. enterprise recipients.
SurveySparrow
Online Proposal Form TemplateThis is a static, fielding-ready form template focused on collecting proposal details rather than reconstructing recipient decision-making. It's a solid starting point for basic proposal feedback collection but relies on fixed question sets with no adaptive follow-up. Best suited for teams that just need a quick structured form rather than a deeper post-decision investigation.
What it does well
- Ready-to-use, purpose-built template specifically for the proposal use case
- Simple setup likely aligned with SurveySparrow's broader survey/form builder ecosystem
- Accessible template gallery entry point for teams unfamiliar with proposal feedback surveys
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI probing — respondents answer fixed questions with no follow-up that adjusts to their specific answer or outcome
- No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for richer qualitative context
- No published methodology or per-response quality scoring, so it's unclear how response depth or reliability is assessed
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Spa Appointment Booking Experience Survey
Measures how easy, fast, and frustration-free it is for clients to book a spa appointment across whatever channel they used — online, app, phone, or in person. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment booking almost fell through, surfacing friction a satisfaction score alone would miss. Built for spa and wellness operators auditing their booking funnel.
View templateUniversity Course Pre-Registration Experience Survey
Measures how smoothly students moved through course pre-registration — portal usability, course availability, advisor support, and overall satisfaction — for registrars and academic advising teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what went wrong during the student's most recent registration attempt, not just how they rated it.
View templateTeam Skill Matrix & Competency Gap Assessment
A structured self-assessment of core job skills across proficiency levels, paired with a prioritization exercise that surfaces where development investment matters most. Built for L&D teams and people managers running skill matrices across a team or department; the AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind each person's biggest reported skill gap.
View templateNursing Home Resident Satisfaction Survey
Captures how residents and their families experience daily care, staff responsiveness, meals, activities, and communication in a nursing home or assisted living community. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind the lowest-rated experience so administrators know exactly what to fix first, not just where the score dropped.
View templateStatement of Work Clarity & Effectiveness Survey
Evaluates how clearly a Statement of Work defined scope, deliverables, timelines, pricing, and change control for a specific client-vendor engagement, and how well execution matched what was written. Built for procurement, PMO, and agency teams reviewing SOW quality after project close, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment scope ambiguity or a change order caused friction.
View templateInnovation Idea Submission Experience Survey
Captures how easy, motivating, and fair the idea submission process felt to someone who just submitted an idea to your innovation program — covering guideline clarity, form usability, and intent to submit again. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the actual idea's context and the friction that almost stopped them from submitting, giving program owners concrete fixes instead of a generic satisfaction score.
View template