All templates
Sustainability & Impact

Outage Notification & ETA Accuracy Satisfaction Survey

Measures residential utility customer satisfaction with outage notifications, estimated restoration time accuracy, and communication channel preferences. Designed for utility providers seeking to identify communication gaps and prioritize improvements.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

21 questions · ~10 min
Q01
Message

Welcome, and thank you for your interest in this survey. We are conducting research about experiences with power outage notifications and estimated restoration times over the past 12 months. Please answer based on your primary energy provider. Your participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete.

Q02
Multiple Choice

In the past 12 months, did you experience any power outages at your residence?

  • Yes, at least one
  • No
  • Not sure
Q03
Dropdown

Approximately how many separate power outages did you experience in the past 12 months?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3–4
  • 5–7
  • 8–10
  • More than 10
Q04
Multiple Choice

Which of the following channels did you receive outage notifications from? Please select all that apply.

  • SMS/text message
  • Email
  • Mobile app push notification
  • Automated phone call/IVR
  • Utility website/status page
  • Social media
  • In-person door tag or letter
  • I did not receive any notifications
Q05
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the most recent outage notification you received, how would you rate its timeliness?

Scale: 17
Min:Extremely untimelyMax:Extremely timely
Q06
Multiple Choice

Compared with the estimated time of restoration (ETR) you received, the actual restoration was…

  • Much earlier than stated
  • Slightly earlier than stated
  • About what was stated
  • Slightly later than stated
  • Much later than stated
  • I did not receive an ETR
Q07
Opinion Scale

Overall, how satisfied are you with how your utility provider communicates during outages?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all satisfiedMax:Extremely satisfied
Q08
Dropdown

For planned outages, how much advance notice would you prefer from your utility provider?

  • Same day (less than 4 hours)
  • Same day (4–12 hours)
  • Day before (12–24 hours)
  • 2–3 days before
  • 4–7 days before
  • More than a week before
  • I don't need advance notice
Q09
AI Interview

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience with outage notifications and estimated restoration times.

Q10
Multiple Choice

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Message

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback is valuable and will be used to help improve outage communication practices.

Q12
Multiple Choice

Which single channel would you most prefer for receiving outage updates?

  • SMS/text message
  • Email
  • Mobile app push notification
  • Automated phone call/IVR
  • Utility website/status page
  • Social media
  • Other (please specify)
  • No preference
Q13
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the clarity of that notification?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all clearMax:Extremely clear
Q14
Multiple Choice

During your most recent outage, how frequently were the estimated restoration times updated?

  • No updates after the first estimate
  • Updated once during the outage
  • Updated every few hours
  • Updated hourly or more frequently
  • I did not receive an estimate
Q15
Opinion Scale

How confident are you that future estimated restoration times from your provider will be accurate?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q16
Ranking

Please rank the following by importance for improving outage communications, where 1 = most important.

  1. More accurate estimated restoration times
  2. More frequent updates during outages
  3. Clearer cause-of-outage and crew status information
  4. Earlier proactive notifications before outages
  5. Reliable delivery on my preferred channel
  6. Interactive outage map with live status
Drag to rank
Q17
Multiple Choice

What is your gender?

  • Female
  • Male
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the usefulness of the information provided in that notification?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all usefulMax:Extremely useful
Q19
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to recommend your utility provider to a friend or neighbor based on their outage communication?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q20
Dropdown

Which country or region do you live in?

  • United States
  • Canada
  • United Kingdom
  • Australia
  • Other (please specify)
Q21
Multiple Choice

Which best describes the area where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Rural
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Purpose-built for utility outage communication, covering notification receipt, channel preferences, ETR accuracy, and clarity/usefulness ratings rather than generic satisfaction questions
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that lets customers elaborate on their outage experience in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
  • Combines opinion-scale, ranking, and dropdown question types to capture both quantitative satisfaction scores and prioritized improvement areas (e.g., ranking communication improvements, advance notice preferences)
  • Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean utility teams get structured, ready-to-use findings without manual analysis

Jotform

200+ Customer Satisfaction Evaluation Forms

This is a broad category page listing many generic customer satisfaction form templates rather than a single fielding-ready survey, and none are specific to utility outage communication. Useful as a form-building starting point but requires significant customization for outage/ETR-specific research.

What it does well

  • Large library of customizable form templates across many use cases
  • Drag-and-drop form builder likely included for quick edits

Where it falls short

  • No utility-outage or ETR-specific questions; would need to be built from scratch
  • Static form fields only, no adaptive AI follow-up probing into open-ended feedback
  • No transparent, publishable methodology or prompt logic for how responses are interpreted

QuestionPro

Customer satisfaction survey questions | Customer satisfaction survey example

A generic customer satisfaction survey template with example questions, not tailored to outage notifications, ETR accuracy, or utility communication channels. It offers a solid general CSAT starting point but lacks domain-specific structure.

What it does well

  • Established survey platform with reporting and analytics tools
  • Provides example questions to help users draft their own satisfaction survey

Where it falls short

  • No outage-specific or ETR accuracy questions built in
  • Fixed-format questions only; no adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up
  • No disclosed per-response scoring methodology

SurveyMonkey

Customer Satisfaction Survey Template

A ready-to-use general CSAT template from a well-known survey platform, but it is generic and not designed for utility outage notification or restoration-time accuracy research. Teams would need to substantially rewrite questions for this use case.

What it does well

  • Quick deployment via a widely used, reputable survey platform
  • Standard CSAT question set and basic analytics dashboard

Where it falls short

  • No coverage of outage notification channels, ETR accuracy, or advance-notice preferences
  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning based on individual responses
  • No transparent prompt/methodology documentation for how open responses are analyzed

SurveySparrow

FREE Customer Satisfaction Survey Template

A free, generic customer satisfaction template aimed at general business use, not utility-specific outage or ETR research. It provides a conversational survey format but omits the domain-specific structure this topic requires.

What it does well

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format may improve completion rates
  • Free template offering lowers barrier to entry

Where it falls short

  • No outage notification, ETR accuracy, or channel-preference questions included
  • No adaptive AI or voice-based interview capability for deeper follow-up
  • No published scoring rubric or prompt transparency for response evaluation

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Sustainability & Impact

E-commerce ESG Double Materiality Assessment

Assess stakeholder-perceived importance and business impact of key ESG topics for e-commerce companies. Designed for double materiality mapping with internal and external stakeholders across multiple regions.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Heat Pump Adoption Barriers & Decision Drivers Survey

Measures homeowner awareness, cost perception, trust in contractors, incentive impact, and psychological barriers to heat pump adoption. Designed for energy utilities, policymakers, and HVAC marketers seeking to identify and prioritize adoption levers.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Consumer Trust in Green Claims & Evidence Preferences

Measures consumer credibility perceptions of environmental claims, preferred evidence types, and greenwashing experiences to inform sustainability messaging strategy.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Logistics EV Fleet Electrification Readiness Assessment

A readiness audit for logistics and fleet operations leaders evaluating EV deployment, covering charging infrastructure, energy management, training, and budget—designed to benchmark preparedness and identify deployment risks.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Public EV Charging Experience Survey

Measures electric vehicle drivers' satisfaction with public charging station availability, payment processes, and on-site safety to identify priority improvements for charging network operators.

View template
Sustainability & Impact

Consumer Trust in Carbon Offset Claims Survey

Measures consumer trust in corporate carbon-offset claims, preferences for emissions reductions vs. offsets, and willingness to pay a premium. Designed to inform ESG strategy, sustainability communications, and brand positioning.

View template