Power Analysis Parameter Intake Survey
A structured intake instrument for statisticians and researchers to systematically document effect size, variance, design, and attrition assumptions needed to conduct power and sample size calculations.
No sign-up to try · Unlimited responses on the free plan
Welcome to the Power Analysis & Sample Size Planning Survey. This survey collects the assumptions and parameters needed to conduct a power or sample size analysis for your study. Your responses will be used solely to inform your analysis plan and will be kept confidential. There are no right or wrong answers — best estimates are perfectly acceptable. The survey takes approximately 8–12 minutes. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.
Powered by QuestionPunk
Default theme. Colors and fonts are yours to change.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
What is the primary study area?
- Biomedical / Clinical
- Public Health
- Social Science
- Education
- Economics
- Psychology / Behavioral
- Engineering
- Other
What is the primary outcome type?
- Continuous
- Binary / Proportion (0–1)
- Count
- Time-to-event (survival)
- Ordinal
- Other
Which effect metric will the power analysis use?
- Mean difference
- Standardized mean difference (Cohen's d)
- Odds ratio
- Risk ratio
- Risk difference
- Hazard ratio
- Rate ratio
- Correlation coefficient
- Change-score difference
What is the planned effect size? (Enter the numeric value in your chosen metric — e.g., 0.3 for Cohen's d, 1.5 for an odds ratio.)
What is the minimum detectable effect (MDE) you consider practically meaningful? (Use the same metric and units as your planned effect size.)
What is the unit for the effect size? (e.g., mmHg, points; enter 'standardized' if unitless.)
What is the assumed distribution for the primary outcome?
- Normal
- Binomial
- Poisson
- Negative binomial
- Log-normal
- Exponential
- Weibull
If your primary outcome is continuous, what is the assumed standard deviation? (Enter the value in outcome units; leave blank if not applicable.)
If your primary outcome is binary, what is the expected control-group event rate? (Enter a proportion between 0 and 1; leave blank if not applicable.)
What are the source(s) for your variance or event-rate assumptions? (e.g., pilot data, literature, registry — please include citations or links where possible.)
How many arms or groups does your study design include?
- 1 (single-group)
- 2
- 3
- 4 or more
What is the planned allocation ratio across groups?
- 1:1
- 2:1
- 1:2
- 1:1:1
- Other
What significance level (alpha) will you use? (e.g., 0.05, 0.01)
What is your target statistical power? (e.g., 0.80, 0.90)
Will the primary hypothesis test be one-sided or two-sided?
- Two-sided
- One-sided
Is the design clustered or cluster-randomized?
- No
- Yes
If your design is clustered, what is the assumed intra-class correlation (ICC)? (Enter a value between 0 and 1.)
If your design is clustered, what is the expected average cluster size?
Does the study involve repeated measures or longitudinal outcomes?
- No
- Yes
If your study has repeated measures, what is the assumed within-subject correlation (rho)? (Enter a value between 0 and 1.)
What is the planned follow-up duration? (Please state the number and unit — e.g., '12 weeks', '6 months'.)
What is the expected attrition or loss-to-follow-up rate over the full analysis window? (Enter a proportion between 0 and 1 — e.g., 0.15 for 15%.)
The attrition rate you entered above is expressed per:
- Week
- Month
- Entire follow-up period
How do you plan to handle missing data? (Select all that apply.)
- Complete-case analysis
- Multiple imputation
- Maximum likelihood / mixed models
- Inverse probability weighting
- Last observation carried forward
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how confident are you in the accuracy of the assumptions you provided in this survey?
What sources informed these estimates? (Select all that apply.)
- Pilot data
- Prior RCT
- Observational dataset
- Systematic review / meta-analysis
- Registry / EMR
- Expert judgment
- Feasibility constraints
Please provide any additional citations, datasets, or notes relevant to the assumptions you reported above.
Thank you for the details you've provided so far. I'd like to ask a couple of follow-up questions to clarify any gaps in your study assumptions — particularly around your variance estimates, design trade-offs, or feasibility constraints.
Based on your responses in this survey, is there any additional context, assumptions, or constraints we should consider for your power analysis?
What is your primary role or discipline?
- Biostatistician
- Epidemiologist
- Clinical researcher
- Social scientist
- Data analyst
- Student / trainee
- Other
How many years of experience do you have with study design or analysis?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–7 years
- 8–15 years
- 16+ years
Which region are you primarily based in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- South America
- Oceania
- Middle East
- Multiple / Other
What type of organization do you primarily work in?
- University / Academic
- Hospital / Health system
- Government
- Industry / Pharma
- Nonprofit / NGO
- Independent consultant
- Other
What country are you primarily based in? (Optional)
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will be used to tailor an appropriate power and sample size analysis plan for your study. If you have questions, please contact your study statistician or the research team.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Systematically captures every parameter a statistician needs for a power/sample size calculation — effect size, MDE, variance/event-rate assumptions, design (arms, allocation ratio, clustering, repeated measures), alpha/power, and attrition — in one structured instrument
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe inconsistencies or ask for clarification on the assumptions provided, something a static form cannot do
- Collects methodological provenance (source of variance/event-rate assumptions, citations, confidence rating) so downstream analysts can audit the inputs rather than just receiving raw numbers
- Closes with an open-text prompt for additional context/assumptions plus respondent background (role, experience, region, organization type), giving the analyst calibration context on who supplied the estimates
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Power Analysis Parameter Intake Survey” template?
The template includes 34 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “What is the primary study area?” · “What is the primary outcome type?” · “Which effect metric will the power analysis use?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 34 questions in about 15 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.






