Scope 3 GHG Emissions Readiness Assessment
Evaluates internal stakeholder readiness to measure and report Scope 3 supply chain emissions, identifying capability gaps, data maturity, supplier engagement levels, and barriers across functional teams.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Which areas are you involved in for Scope 3 work? Select all that apply.
- Sustainability / ESG
- Procurement / Supply chain
- Finance / Controllership
- Operations / Manufacturing
- IT / Data
- Product / Engineering
- Legal / Compliance
- Executive leadership
- Other
Rank the top barriers to initiating or advancing Scope 3 measurement (biggest barrier first).
- Limited data availability or access
- Low supplier response or engagement
- Lack of clear internal ownership
- Tools or IT capability gaps
- Budget or time constraints
Which Scope 3 categories has our organization measured or estimated in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Cat. 1: Purchased goods & services
- Cat. 2: Capital goods
- Cat. 3: Fuel- & energy-related activities
- Cat. 4: Upstream transportation & distribution
- Cat. 5: Waste generated in operations
- Cat. 6: Business travel
- Cat. 7: Employee commuting
- Cat. 8: Upstream leased assets
- Cat. 9: Downstream transportation & distribution
- Cat. 10: Processing of sold products
- Cat. 11: Use of sold products
- Cat. 12: End-of-life treatment of sold products
- Cat. 13: Downstream leased assets
- Cat. 14: Franchises
- Cat. 15: Investments
- None measured yet
- Unsure
How would you rate our organization's current capability for collecting Scope 3 input data (e.g., spend data, activity data, supplier responses)?
Approximately what share of our annual spend is covered by supplier-provided emissions data?
- 0–20%
- 21–40%
- 41–60%
- 61–80%
- 81–100%
- Unsure / N/A
Who is primarily accountable for Scope 3 reporting outcomes in our organization?
- Sustainability / ESG
- CFO / Finance
- COO / Operations
- Chief Procurement Officer
- Decentralized across business units
- To be determined
- Other
Based on your responses throughout this survey, are there any risks, dependencies, or additional suggestions we should consider for our Scope 3 program?
Where is your role primarily based?
- Americas
- EMEA
- APAC
- Global / Multi-region
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time—your responses have been recorded and will be used to inform our Scope 3 emissions roadmap. If you have any questions about this assessment, please contact the Sustainability team.
Which best describes our organization's current Scope 3 measurement status?
- Not started
- Planning and scoping
- Piloting calculations in select categories
- Regularly measuring some categories
- Comprehensive measurement across material categories
- Unsure
What support would most accelerate our initial Scope 3 efforts? Select all that apply.
- Training on GHG Protocol Scope 3
- Supplier outreach toolkit/templates
- Dedicated budget or headcount
- Executive sponsorship/mandate
- Calculation/automation tool
- Access to data lake/master data
- External consultant support
- Other
For the categories you selected above, how would you describe the overall depth of coverage?
- Rough estimates using spend-based proxies only
- Mix of spend-based and activity-based data
- Mostly activity-based with some supplier-specific data
- Primarily supplier-specific or measured data
- Unsure / Not applicable
How would you rate our current capability for applying Scope 3 calculation methodologies (e.g., spend-based, activity-based, hybrid)?
Which emissions-related requests does our organization currently make of suppliers? Select all that apply.
- Product carbon footprints
- Site-level (facility) emissions
- Third-party assurance/verification
- Emissions reduction targets
- Renewable energy usage
- We do not ask for emissions data
- Other
What is our organization's current plan for Scope 3 assurance or verification?
- No assurance planned
- Internal review only
- Limited assurance this year
- Reasonable assurance this year
- Plan to seek assurance in the next 12 months
- Not sure
Thank you for your input so far. We'd like to explore a few of your responses in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you up to 2 follow-up questions based on your answers.
How many years have you worked in areas related to Scope 3 or comparable sustainability reporting?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- More than 10 years
- Prefer not to say
When do you expect our organization could begin external Scope 3 reporting?
- Already reporting externally
- Within 3 months
- 3–6 months
- 6–12 months
- More than 12 months
- No plans yet
Which data sources does our organization currently use for Scope 3 calculations? Select all that apply.
- Spend or procurement data
- Supplier-specific primary data
- Product LCA studies
- Industry averages/databases (e.g., ecoinvent)
- Utility bills/energy data
- Logistics shipment records
- Travel provider reports
- Waste hauler tickets
- Other
How would you rate our current capability for using reporting systems and tools to consolidate and disclose Scope 3 data?
What would most increase supplier participation in emissions data sharing over the next 6–12 months? Select all that apply.
- Standardized questionnaire and guidance
- Co-funding or incentives for measurement
- Contractual requirements or scorecards
- Training webinars and office hours
- Simple data submission portal
- Recognition program for top performers
- Other
Rank the following activities by where you expect your team to focus the most effort over the next 12 months (highest effort first).
- Data collection and supplier outreach
- Calculation methodology and tools
- Internal training and capability building
- External reporting and disclosure
- Assurance and verification readiness
How confident are you in the quality of our organization's current Scope 3 data?
How would you rate the level of internal expertise and training available for Scope 3 measurement within our organization?
How often does our organization currently report Scope 3 emissions externally?
- Not reporting externally
- Ad hoc
- Annually
- Semiannually
- Quarterly
How would you rate our current capability for verifying or assuring Scope 3 data (e.g., internal controls, audit trails, third-party review)?
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Why this template
What this template is built to do — we found no directly comparable template from other survey tools to review.
What sets it apart
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that adaptively probes specific responses (e.g., data maturity or barriers) rather than relying on fixed follow-up questions
- Covers the full Scope 3 readiness picture in one template: stakeholder involvement, measurement status, category-level depth, data sources, capability ratings across collection/calculation/tooling/expertise/verification, supplier engagement, and accountability/assurance ownership
- Uses ranking and opinion-scale question types to quantify barriers, focus areas, and capability levels (data quality, methodology, tooling, expertise, verification) for structured cross-team comparison
- Closes with an open-text risk/dependency summary plus role and tenure demographic questions, enabling segmentation of readiness by function and experience level
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Scope 3 GHG Emissions Readiness Assessment” template?
The template includes 27 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome to the Scope 3 Emissions Readiness Assessment. This survey gathers input from internal stakeholders to evaluate…” · “Which areas are you involved in for Scope 3 work? Select all that apply.” · “Rank the top barriers to initiating or advancing Scope 3 measurement (biggest barrier first).”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 27 questions in about 12 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Electronics Repairability vs. Warranty Trade-off Study
Measures how consumer electronics buyers weigh repairability against warranty coverage in purchase decisions. Use this instrument to identify key purchase drivers, willingness-to-pay premiums for repairability features, and information-seeking behavior across demographic segments.
View templateManufacturing Supplier ESG Performance Audit
A structured audit instrument for assessing manufacturing suppliers across environmental, social, and governance pillars. Designed for procurement and sustainability teams to identify ESG risks, benchmark supplier maturity, and prioritize collaborative improvement initiatives.
View templateThird-Party Risk Disclosure Clarity Assessment
Evaluates how clearly third-party risk disclosures and mitigations are communicated across teams. Designed for GRC, security, procurement, and other stakeholders who interact with vendor risk information, this instrument identifies gaps in accessibility, readability, and actionability to drive targeted improvements.
View templatePre-Deployment Change Readiness & Risk Assessment
Assesses organizational and technical readiness for infrastructure, application, or data migrations by flagging dependency risks, evaluating rollback preparedness, and measuring stakeholder confidence before go/no-go decisions.
View templateLogistics EV Fleet Electrification Readiness Assessment
A readiness audit for logistics and fleet operations leaders evaluating EV deployment, covering charging infrastructure, energy management, training, and budget—designed to benchmark preparedness and identify deployment risks.
View templateInternal Audit Readiness & Process Clarity Assessment
Measures employee preparedness for internal audits, identifies gaps in guidance, tooling, and training, and surfaces priority areas for process improvement. Designed for organizations seeking to standardize audit readiness across departments.
View template