Q01
Message
All templatesEducation & Academic
Teacher Performance and Classroom Experience Evaluation
Captures how students experience a teacher's clarity, fairness, feedback, and engagement using a rating battery and a best-worst trade-off on what matters most, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment behind their lowest rating instead of a vague complaint. Built for course or semester-end teacher evaluations.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
12 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple Choice
Including this term, how many classes have you taken with this teacher?
- This is my first
- Two
- Three
- Four or more
Q03
MatrixRequired
How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?
5 rows × 5 columns
- Explains concepts clearly
- Is fair and unbiased in grading
- Encourages questions and participation
- Provides timely feedback on assignments
- Manages class time effectively
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how effective is this teacher at helping you learn the material?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not effective at allMax:Extremely effective
Q05
Multiple Choice
In the last month, how often did this teacher respond when you asked for help outside of class (email, office hours, messages)?
- Never asked
- Never responded
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Every time I asked
Q06
Rating ScaleRequired
How clear were this teacher's grading criteria and expectations for assignments?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Very unclearMax:Very clear
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
For each set, pick which quality matters most and which matters least to your learning in this teacher's class.
- Explains material clearly
- Is approachable and available for help
- Grades fairly
- Gives useful feedback on work
- Makes the subject interesting
- Manages the classroom effectively
- Is well organized and prepared
- Cares about student success
Pick best & worst per setBest:Matters mostWorst:Matters least
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to recommend this teacher's class to another student?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q09
AI Interview
Identify the statement the respondent rated lowest in the earlier agreement battery (or the aspect behind a low overall effectiveness score) and get a specific, recent example of it happening in class — what occurred, how it affected their learning, and whether it was a one-time issue or a pattern. If everything was rated highly, probe what this teacher does that other teachers don't, anchored on a concrete classroom moment.
Q10
Long Text
Is there anything specific this teacher could do differently to help you learn better?
Q11
Multiple Choice
What grade or year level are you in?
- 9th grade
- 10th grade
- 11th grade
- 12th grade
- College/University
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Message
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback! Responses are combined with other students' answers into a summary report shared with school leadership to support this teacher's development.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Uses a rating and agreement-statement battery to establish where a teacher is weakest, then triggers an AI follow-up interview specifically on the statement the student rated lowest, replacing vague written complaints with a concrete moment
- Includes a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off exercise so results show which qualities (clarity, fairness, feedback, engagement) matter most to students' learning rather than just raw averages
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scale effectiveness, recommendation likelihood, grading-clarity rating) with an open-ended 'what could this teacher do differently' question and a targeted AI probe for richer, actionable qualitative detail
- Transparent about what's being asked and why, with a short intro/outro message framing the survey as ~5 minutes and confirming responses will be aggregated with other students'
QuestionPro
Course evaluation sample questions and survey templateA course/teacher evaluation template with sample questions covering instructor effectiveness and course quality, aimed at academic institutions. It's a static question set you can adapt, not an interactive interview. Good starting point for standard Likert-style course evaluations but leaves qualitative depth to open-text fields alone.
What it does well
- Purpose-built for academic course/teacher evaluation context
- Provides sample questions covering both course and instructor dimensions
- Backed by a broader survey platform with reporting/analytics tools
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe a student's specific lowest-rated experience
- No built-in trade-off (best-worst) method to rank which teaching qualities matter most
- No published methodology for how open-ended responses are scored or summarized
SurveyMonkey
Teacher Evaluation Survey TemplateSurveyMonkey's teacher evaluation template targets high school settings and offers a ready-to-use question set on teaching quality. It's a conventional static form relying on multiple choice and rating scales, with no mechanism to dig deeper into a specific low rating. Useful for quick deployment but limited for uncovering the story behind a poor score.
What it does well
- Well-known, easy-to-deploy survey builder with broad distribution options
- Template is pre-built specifically for high school teacher evaluation
- Likely includes standard reporting/analytics dashboards
Where it falls short
- Fixed question flow with no adaptive interview to follow up on a student's lowest rating
- No best-worst trade-off question type to prioritize which teacher qualities matter most
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Free Teacher & Course Evaluation Form TemplateTypeform offers a conversational-style teacher and course evaluation form with a clean, one-question-at-a-time UI. It's a static template with no branching logic tied to a respondent's specific answers, so a low rating doesn't trigger any deeper questioning. Good for a pleasant respondent experience but not for structured qualitative follow-up.
What it does well
- Polished, conversational form UI that can improve completion rates
- Free template available, lowering barrier to entry
- Covers both course and teacher evaluation angles in one template
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview option to explore a specific complaint
- No max-diff/trade-off question to identify which qualities matter most to students
- No automated quality scoring of responses or transparent AI prompt disclosure
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Teacher Performance and Classroom Experience Evaluation” template?
The template includes 12 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Hi! We'd like your honest feedback on this teacher's class. It takes about 5 minutes, your answers are confidential, and…” · “Including this term, how many classes have you taken with this teacher?” · “How much do you agree with each statement about this teacher?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 12 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Education & Academic
Campus Climate, Belonging, and Inclusion Survey
Measures students' sense of belonging, perceived fairness and safety, and firsthand experiences with exclusionary or discriminatory treatment on campus. Built for institutional research and DEI offices, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific incident or context behind a student's belonging score instead of leaving it as an abstract number.
View templateEducation & Academic
Professor Teaching Effectiveness Evaluation Survey
Measures how students experience a professor's teaching across clarity, engagement, feedback, availability, and fairness, plus overall satisfaction and likelihood to recommend. Built for academic departments and course coordinators running end-of-term reviews, with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment or assignment that most shaped a student's rating.
View templateEducation & Academic
High School Teacher Evaluation & Classroom Effectiveness Survey
Gathers student feedback on a teacher's instructional clarity, fairness, availability, and classroom management, then uses an AI follow-up interview to unpack a specific moment behind the overall rating. Built for department chairs, instructional coaches, and school administrators running end-of-term teacher evaluations.
View templateEducation & Academic
Student Feedback on Teacher Effectiveness Survey
Gathers student feedback on a teacher's clarity, fairness, engagement, and support, plus which qualities matter most to learning. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall recommendation score, surfacing concrete examples instead of vague praise or complaints.
View templateEducation & Academic
End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey
Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.
View templateEducation & Academic
Teaching Assistant Effectiveness Evaluation Survey
Gathers student feedback on a teaching assistant's clarity, responsiveness, fairness, and classroom presence across lectures, labs, or office hours. Includes a best-worst trade-off on what matters most in a TA and an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each student's overall rating, surfacing concrete strengths and fixable gaps departments can act on.
View template