Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll
Finds the best date, time, and format for an upcoming meeting or event by checking real availability against a shortlist of options — for anyone coordinating a group across busy calendars. The AI follow-up digs into the scheduling conflicts and recurring constraints that a simple poll misses, so organizers don't pick a slot that quietly excludes key people.
No sign-up to try · Unlimited responses on the free plan
Live preview
Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll
Hi! We're trying to lock in a time that works for everyone. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Please tell us how the proposed options fit your schedule — takes about 7 minutes.
Powered by QuestionPunk
Default theme. Colors and fonts are yours to change.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
10 questions · ~7 min
Q01
MatrixRequired
How well does each proposed date and time work for you?
3 rows × 3 columns
- Tuesday, 10:00 AM
- Wednesday, 2:00 PM
- Thursday, 9:00 AM
Columns: Works great · Could work · Doesn't work
Q02
RankingRequired
Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.
- Tuesday, 10:00 AM
- Wednesday, 2:00 PM
- Thursday, 9:00 AM
Drag to rank
Q03
DropdownRequired
What time zone should we use when scheduling you?
- Pacific (PT)
- Mountain (MT)
- Central (CT)
- Eastern (ET)
- UK / GMT
- Central Europe (CET)
- India (IST)
- China / Singapore (CST/SGT)
- Japan / Korea (JST/KST)
- Other
Q04
Multiple Choice
What meeting format works best for you?
- In person
- Virtual
- Hybrid (some in person, some virtual)
- No strong preference
Q05
Multiple Choice
Which days of the week generally work best for you, aside from the specific dates above?
- Monday
- Tuesday
- Wednesday
- Thursday
- Friday
- Saturday
- Sunday
Q06
Opinion ScaleRequired
How flexible is your schedule during this window if none of the proposed options end up working?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not flexible at allMax:Extremely flexible
Q07
Opinion Scale
How important is it to you personally that this meeting happens?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not important at allMax:Extremely important
Q08
Short Text
Any recurring conflicts or constraints we should know about (e.g., standing meetings, school pickup, travel)?
Q09
AI Interview
Probe the respondent's real availability behind their ratings: for any date/time they marked 'Could work' or 'Doesn't work,' find out exactly what the conflict is and whether it's fixed or movable. If they flagged low flexibility, dig into what specifically would need to change for them to attend, and whether there's a fallback slot they haven't mentioned. If they marked everything as working perfectly, sanity-check by asking about recurring commitments they might have overlooked.
Q10
Multiple Choice
Which team or department are you scheduling on behalf of?
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Prefer not to say
Message
Thanks for sharing your availability! We'll use everyone's responses to lock in the final date and send a calendar invite shortly.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific reasons behind low-availability ratings and uncovers recurring scheduling conflicts a static poll would miss
- Combines a matrix rating of each proposed date/time with a ranked preference question, so organizers get both granularity and a clear tiebreaker
- Captures time zone, meeting format, and general day-of-week preferences alongside the specific date options, reducing the risk of picking a slot that quietly excludes key people
- Uses opening and closing chat messages plus opinion-scale questions on flexibility and meeting importance to add context AI templates can't gather
Jotform
Scheduling Poll Form TemplateA ready-to-field static form for collecting availability from a group, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It covers the basics of gathering date/time preferences but doesn't probe deeper into why a respondent marked a slot as unavailable. Good for simple polls, less suited to uncovering hidden scheduling conflicts.
What it does well
- Fielding-ready template within a widely used form builder
- Likely supports easy customization of date/time fields and branding
- Part of a broad template library with integrations (payments, notifications, etc.)
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore conflicts behind low-availability answers
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No transparent, published methodology for how the form logic was designed
SurveyMonkey
Online Scheduling Poll TemplateA standard survey template for polling group availability, backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey infrastructure and reporting. It's a fielding-ready poll but relies on fixed multiple-choice/matrix-style questions rather than any conversational probing. Reporting is likely solid for aggregate results but not tailored to individual respondent nuance.
What it does well
- Established survey platform with reliable distribution and reporting tools
- Likely offers clean aggregate visualizations of availability across respondents
- Simple, familiar poll format for quick group scheduling
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into recurring constraints or conflicts
- No voice interview or guided task option for richer context
- No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
Typeform
Scheduling Poll Form TemplateA conversational-style, fielding-ready form for collecting meeting availability, leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX. It's more engaging to fill out than a plain grid but the question flow is still fixed rather than adaptive to individual answers. Useful for simple scheduling polls without deeper conflict discovery.
What it does well
- Polished, conversational UI that likely improves completion rates
- Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup
- Supports logic jumps for basic branching between questions
Where it falls short
- No true adaptive AI interviewing that follows up based on specific availability answers
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated per-response quality scoring or published prompt transparency
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Team Meeting Scheduling Availability Poll” template?
The template includes 10 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “How well does each proposed date and time work for you?” · “Of the options above, rank your top choices from most to least preferred.” · “What time zone should we use when scheduling you?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 10 questions in about 7 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
