Q01
Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation
Evaluates how well a team communicates, makes decisions, shares workload, and supports its members — straight from the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR running regular team health checks, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind whatever obstacle or low score members flagged, not just the number they gave it.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
11 questions · ~6 min
Q02
MatrixRequired
How much do you agree with each statement about your team today?
5 rows × 5 columns
- Team members communicate openly about problems
- We hold each other accountable for commitments
- Decisions get made without unnecessary delay
- Workload is distributed fairly across the team
- I trust my teammates to do their part well
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q03
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how effective is your team at getting its work done?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Not effective at allMax:Extremely effective
Q04
Multiple ChoiceRequired
In the last month, what has been the single biggest obstacle to your team's performance?
- Unclear priorities or goals
- Poor communication between members
- Uneven workload distribution
- Slow or unclear decision-making
- Lack of recognition or low morale
- Insufficient resources or tools
Q05
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required
If you could only fix a few of these about the team, which would matter most versus least?
- Clearer role definitions
- Faster decision-making
- More recognition for good work
- Better meeting efficiency
- More balanced workloads
- Stronger cross-team communication
- More access to tools or resources
Pick best & worst per setBest:Most impactful to improveWorst:Least impactful to improve
Q06
AI Interview
Ask the respondent to walk through a specific, recent example of the obstacle they flagged as biggest — what happened, who was involved, and how it played out. If they rated any team-health statement low (disagree or strongly disagree), probe why that specific one, whether it's new or long-standing, and what a fix would concretely look like. Push past vague answers like 'communication is bad' to get a real scenario.
Q07
Rating Scale
How well does your manager support the team in removing obstacles to good work?
Range: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all supportiveMax:Extremely supportive
Q08
Long Text
What's one thing this team should stop doing in order to work better together?
Q09
Multiple Choice
How long have you been part of this team?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-3 years
- More than 3 years
- Prefer not to say
Q10
Dropdown
How many people are on this team, including you?
- 2-4
- 5-8
- 9-15
- 16 or more
- Prefer not to say
Q11
Message
That's everything — thank you for the candid feedback! Responses across the team will be summarized to identify shared themes and shape concrete changes, not to single anyone out.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Goes beyond a static satisfaction score with a matrix and rating block, then uses an AI follow-up interview to ask respondents to walk through a specific, recent example of whatever obstacle or low score they flagged — so you get the real story, not just the number.
- Uses a max-diff exercise to force prioritization of what to fix first, paired with an open long-text question on what the team should stop doing, giving both ranked and qualitative signal.
- Includes context questions (tenure on team, team size) so results can be segmented, plus manager-support rating to separate individual contributor experience from leadership performance.
- Auto-generates a report from the mix of scaled, ranked, and open-ended responses, and every AI probe uses a transparent, inspectable prompt rather than a black-box script.
Jotform
Team Evaluation Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, aimed at general team evaluation. It's a static fielding-ready template rather than an interview experience, with no mention of adaptive questioning or built-in analysis of open-ended answers.
What it does well
- Quick to deploy with an easy drag-and-drop editor
- Broad template library and integrations typical of Jotform
- Free to start using
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the story behind a low score or named obstacle
- No voice interview option
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated narrative report
SurveySparrow
Team Evaluation Survey TemplateA conversational-style survey template positioned for employee/team evaluation, in line with SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It's a pre-built template for direct fielding, but the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptive to individual answers.
What it does well
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that feels more human than a grid form
- Built for employee-experience use cases
- Template is ready to launch without custom build work
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI that generates a unique follow-up question based on each respondent's specific obstacle
- No voice AI interview mode
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how any open-text answers are handled
Typeform
Free Team Evaluation Form TemplateA free, ready-to-use conversational form template on Typeform's standard form platform. It's polished for one-question-at-a-time completion and branching logic, but is still a fixed-question template rather than a dynamic interview.
What it does well
- Clean, guided one-question-at-a-time flow known for high completion rates
- Free tier available to start immediately
- Conditional logic for branching by answer
Where it falls short
- No AI-generated follow-up that digs into a specific recent example of a flagged obstacle
- No guided task or screen-share capability
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
QuestionPro
Performance Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is primarily an individual performance-evaluation template and question bank on an enterprise survey platform, not a team-collaboration-specific instrument. It's usable as a fielding template but reads more like a general reference/sample questionnaire page than a team-health-check tool.
What it does well
- Large enterprise survey feature set (logic, reporting dashboards, multi-channel distribution)
- Sample questions cover broad performance dimensions
- Established platform with extensive customization options
Where it falls short
- Focused on individual performance rather than team communication/workload dynamics specifically
- No adaptive AI interview that follows up on a respondent's specific obstacle
- No voice AI interview or automated per-response quality scoring
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Team Performance & Collaboration Evaluation” template?
The template includes 11 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how your team is working together. Your honest answers help us fix real pr…” · “How much do you agree with each statement about your team today?” · “Overall, how effective is your team at getting its work done?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 11 questions in about 6 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Industry-Specific
Workplace Language Proficiency Self-Assessment Survey
Assesses how employees or candidates actually use a target language on the job — across speaking, listening, reading, and writing — for HR, L&D, and global teams making staffing or training decisions, with an AI follow-up interview that stress-tests self-reported confidence against a real recent high-stakes work conversation.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Team Performance & Collaboration Pulse Check
Measures how a team is actually performing — goal clarity, communication, accountability, and delivery speed — from the perspective of the people doing the work. Built for managers and HR/People teams running quarterly or post-project pulse checks. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the biggest rated gap instead of leaving it as a vague score.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation
Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Cross-Department Performance & Collaboration Review
Captures how internal stakeholders experience working with a specific department — responsiveness, quality, communication, and reliability — plus a trade-off exercise on what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent interaction behind the numbers so leaders get concrete, fixable detail instead of vague ratings.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Supervisor Performance Evaluation Survey
Measures how employees experience their direct supervisor's communication, fairness, support, and recognition. Built for HR teams and people managers running upward-feedback or 360 cycles. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment behind the overall effectiveness score, surfacing concrete behaviors instead of generic ratings.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey
Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.
View template