All templates
Customer Experience

Technical Support Interaction Quality Survey

Measures how well a recent technical support interaction resolved the customer's issue, how much effort it took, and how the agent performed — built for support and CX teams tracking ticket quality beyond a single CSAT number. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened on the ticket instead of just the rating given.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

13 questions · ~7 min
Q01
Message

Thanks for taking a moment to tell us about your recent support experience! This helps us fix what's not working. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 4-5 minutes.

Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How did you contact our technical support team for this issue?

  • Live chat
  • Phone
  • Email
  • Support ticket / help portal
  • Social media
  • In-person / on-site
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired

Was your issue fully resolved?

  • Yes, fully resolved
  • Partially resolved
  • Not resolved
  • Still waiting on a resolution
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how satisfied were you with this support interaction?

Scale: 17
Min:Very dissatisfiedMax:Very satisfied
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired

How much personal effort did it take on your part to get this issue resolved?

Scale: 17
Min:Very high effortMax:Very low effort
Q06
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree with each statement about the support agent(s) you worked with?

4 rows × 5 columns
  • The agent was knowledgeable about my issue
  • The agent communicated clearly and avoided confusing jargon
  • The agent was courteous and professional
  • My issue was handled in a reasonable amount of time
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
Best–Worst Trade-off (MaxDiff)Required

When you contact technical support, which of these matter most to you, and which matter least?

  • Fast response time
  • Resolving the issue on the first contact
  • Agent's technical knowledge
  • Clear, jargon-free communication
  • Proactive follow-up after the ticket closes
  • Multiple ways to reach support (chat, phone, email)
  • Empathy and patience from the agent
Pick best & worst per setBest:Matters mostWorst:Matters least
Q08
Number

Roughly how many hours passed between when you first reported the issue and when it was resolved (or last updated, if still open)?

Q09
AI Interview

Reconstruct exactly what happened during this respondent's support interaction: what the issue was, what steps the agent took, and where things went smoothly or broke down. If their effort or satisfaction rating was low, or the issue was only partially resolved, dig into the specific moment things went wrong — a hand-off, a repeated explanation, a wrong fix — and what would have prevented it. If everything went well, ask what specifically made it feel effortless so it can be repeated.

Q10
Long Text

Is there anything specific we could have done differently to improve this support experience?

Q11
Multiple Choice

In the last 90 days, how many times have you contacted our technical support?

  • None
  • 1-2 times
  • 3-5 times
  • 6 or more times
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice

Which best describes your role in using our product?

  • Individual contributor / end user
  • Manager or team lead
  • IT / technical administrator
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
Message

That's everything — thank you for the honest feedback! Your responses go straight to our support leadership team to improve how we help customers like you.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs exactly what happened during the support interaction, rather than relying only on scaled ratings
  • Pairs standard resolution and satisfaction/effort scales with a matrix on agent behaviors and a MaxDiff to reveal which support qualities customers actually prioritize
  • Captures resolution time (hours to resolution) and contact frequency in the last 90 days to add operational context beyond a single CSAT score
  • Closes with an open long-text question inviting specific improvement suggestions, plus a transparent, auto-generated report tying it all together

QuestionPro

Technical Support Satisfaction Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a genuinely comparable template/questionnaire page covering technical support satisfaction. It offers a standard set of static survey questions and sample question bank rather than a dynamic interview flow. Useful as a question-writing reference but requires manual customization for fielding.

What it does well

  • Provides a ready sample questionnaire specifically for technical support evaluation
  • Likely offers question-bank flexibility and export options common to QuestionPro's survey builder
  • Established survey platform with broad question-type support

Where it falls short

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe into what actually happened on a ticket
  • No mention of voice AI interviews or guided screen-share tasks for reconstructing incidents
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

SurveyMonkey

Customer Support Survey Template

A general customer support survey template rather than one focused specifically on technical support tickets, so questions likely address broader service quality rather than issue-resolution mechanics. It's a fielding-ready static template within SurveyMonkey's builder. Good baseline CSAT-style survey but not tailored to technical troubleshooting nuances.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready template within a widely used, easy-to-deploy survey platform
  • Likely includes standard CSAT/NPS-style questions applicable across support types
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analytics tools

Where it falls short

  • Generic customer support focus, not tailored to technical issue resolution, effort, or ticket-specific timing
  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to reconstruct the actual support interaction
  • No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt visibility for responses

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Technical Support Interaction Quality Survey” template?

The template includes 13 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Thanks for taking a moment to tell us about your recent support experience! This helps us fix what's not working. Your r…” · “How did you contact our technical support team for this issue?” · “Was your issue fully resolved?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 13 questions in about 7 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Customer Experience

Short Customer Satisfaction Pulse Survey

A fast, 2-3 minute check-in that captures overall satisfaction, likelihood to recommend, and satisfaction with specific touchpoints — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reason behind each score instead of just the number. Built for post-purchase, post-support, or quarterly relationship pulses.

View template
Customer Experience

Customer Service Interaction Feedback Survey

Captures satisfaction, effort, and resolution quality right after a support interaction, plus what matters most in a good service experience. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment things went well or fell apart, surfacing details a rating alone can't explain. Built for support, CX, and operations teams.

View template
Customer Experience

Customer Support Agent Interaction Feedback

Captures how a specific customer support interaction went — channel used, resolution, effort, and how the agent performed on key behaviors — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reason behind the satisfaction score, not just the number. Built for support ops and CX teams tracking agent quality over time.

View template
Customer Experience

Customer Support Request Experience Survey

Captures how a recent support request went — channel used, effort required, resolution status, and satisfaction — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into what actually happened during the interaction, not just the rating given. Built for support and CX teams tracking ticket quality beyond CSAT scores.

View template
Customer Experience

IT Help Desk Satisfaction & Resolution Survey

Measures how employees experience IT support — ticket resolution speed, first-contact resolution, technician communication, and whether self-service resources actually deflect tickets. An AI follow-up reconstructs what really happened on the respondent's most recent ticket instead of a generalized impression, surfacing the specific breakdowns behind low satisfaction scores.

View template
Customer Experience

Help Desk & IT Support Experience Survey

Measures how easily customers or employees got their issue resolved through your help desk — first-contact resolution, effort, agent quality — for one specific support interaction. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what caused friction (or what went smoothly) so support leaders know what to fix, not just how people rated it.

View template