Q01
Message
All templatesIndustry-Specific
Vaccine Appointment Registration Experience Survey
Measures how easily people can find, register for, and confirm vaccination appointments across online, phone, and walk-in channels, and pinpoints exactly where the process breaks down. Built for health systems, pharmacies, and public health programs; the AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened at the moment registration got difficult, not just a friction score.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
13 questions · ~7 min
Q02
Multiple ChoiceRequired
Which vaccine were you registering for? (Template note: replace these options with the vaccines your program offers.)
- Seasonal flu shot
- COVID-19 vaccine or booster
- RSV vaccine
- Childhood immunization
- Travel vaccine
Q03
Multiple ChoiceRequired
How did you complete your registration?
- Online portal or website
- Phone call
- Walk-in without an appointment
- Mobile app
- Through my employer or school
- Someone else registered for me
Q04
Opinion ScaleRequired
Overall, how easy or difficult was it to register for your appointment?
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q05
Multiple Choice
About how long did the registration process take, from start to confirmation?
- Less than 5 minutes
- 5-15 minutes
- 16-30 minutes
- More than 30 minutes
- I gave up before finishing
Q06
MatrixRequired
Rate each part of the registration process.
4 rows × 5 columns
- Finding an available appointment slot
- Entering personal or insurance information
- Receiving a confirmation message
- Getting reminders before the appointment
Columns: Very poor · Poor · Fair · Good · Very good
Q07
Multiple Choice
Did you run into any of these problems while registering? Select all that apply.
- Website or app errors
- Long wait times on hold
- Confusing instructions
- No appointment slots available
- Language barriers
- Had to re-enter information multiple times
Q08
Opinion ScaleRequired
How likely are you to recommend this registration process to a friend or family member who needs a vaccine?
Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q09
AI Interview
Reconstruct the specific moment the respondent's registration went smoothly or got difficult: what step they were on, what exactly happened (an error message, a hold time, confusing wording), and how they resolved it — called back, asked staff, or gave up. If they reported a problem or rated ease low, dig into what would have fixed it on the first try. If they gave up before finishing, find out whether and how they eventually got vaccinated.
Q10
Long Text
What one change would have made registering for your vaccine easier?
Q11
Multiple Choice
Which age group do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-29
- 30-44
- 45-59
- 60-74
- 75 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which best describes why you were registering?
- General public
- Healthcare worker
- High-risk or chronic condition
- Caregiver registering for someone else
- Employer or school-sponsored program
- Prefer not to say
Q13
Message
That's everything — thank you! Your answers will be used to fix bottlenecks in the vaccine registration process and reported back to the team running this program.
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes a dedicated opinion-scale ease rating plus a separate recommend-likelihood question, giving both a friction score and an NPS-style signal
- A matrix question rates each individual step of the registration process (finding, registering, confirming), pinpointing exactly where breakdown occurs across online, phone, and walk-in channels
- An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment registration went smoothly or went wrong, capturing what actually happened rather than just a satisfaction number
- Covers channel completed, time-to-confirmation, specific problems encountered, and an open-ended 'one change' question, then closes with a transparent note on how responses will be used to fix bottlenecks
Jotform
COVID-19 Vaccine Registration Form TemplateThis is a data-intake form for signing people up for a vaccine appointment (name, contact info, appointment slot), not a survey measuring how the registration experience went. It's a fielding-ready form template but serves a different purpose than an experience/friction survey. Useful for the registration step itself, not for diagnosing where people struggled.
What it does well
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within a widely used form builder
- Broad template library and integrations for actual appointment intake
- Free to use and quick to deploy for basic registration collection
Where it falls short
- Static field-based form with no adaptive follow-up probing into why a step failed
- No automated per-response quality scoring or synthesized report on friction points
- No AI or voice interview capability to reconstruct what happened at the moment of difficulty
SurveySparrow
Vaccination Registration Form Template | COVID - 19Also framed as a registration form (collecting appointment/registration details) rather than a post-registration experience survey. SurveySparrow's conversational, chat-style format is a nice touch for completion rates, but the template itself is about capturing registration data, not diagnosing channel-specific friction. Fielding-ready as a form, not as a diagnostic experience study.
What it does well
- Conversational, chat-like question flow that can feel friendlier than a static form
- Supports multi-channel distribution for collecting registrations
- Simple to launch without custom setup
Where it falls short
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig into a specific bad moment in the registration process
- No automated quality scoring per response or auto-generated diagnostic report
- No published methodology or prompt transparency behind its question logic
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Industry-Specific
Military Leadership Counseling Session Effectiveness Survey
Measures how clear, fair, and actionable formal counseling sessions feel to service members — covering performance, career, and corrective counseling — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs what actually happened in the most recent session and whether the feedback stuck. Built for unit leaders and training commands reviewing their counseling process.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Innovation Idea Submission Experience Survey
Captures how easy, motivating, and fair the idea submission process felt to someone who just submitted an idea to your innovation program — covering guideline clarity, form usability, and intent to submit again. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the actual idea's context and the friction that almost stopped them from submitting, giving program owners concrete fixes instead of a generic satisfaction score.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Immediate Assistance Request Experience Survey
Measures how well your team handles in-the-moment help requests — response speed, staff helpfulness, and whether the issue actually got resolved — for any service that offers on-demand assistance (call buttons, chat, concierge, help desks). An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened during the request, not just how it felt afterward.
View templateIndustry-Specific
What Animal Am I? Personality Quiz
A playful personality quiz that matches respondents to a spirit animal based on how they actually behave in social, work, and stress situations — not just how they see themselves. The AI follow-up digs into the one answer that most shaped their result, so the final match feels earned rather than random.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Debate Performance Feedback Survey
Captures how judges, audience members, and competitors experienced a specific debate — argument quality, delivery, and persuasiveness — plus an AI follow-up that reconstructs the single moment that most shaped who 'won' the room. Built for debate coaches, tournament organizers, and educators running practice rounds or competitions.
View templateIndustry-Specific
Call-Back Option Experience Survey
Evaluates how well your 'request a call back instead of waiting on hold' feature performs in practice — whether the promised wait time held up, whether agents had context when they called, and whether the issue actually got resolved. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened during the call-back moment, not just how the customer rated it.
View template