Brand Power Score: Awareness, Consideration & Loyalty Tracker
Measures the core drivers of brand strength — unaided and aided awareness, familiarity, consideration, attribute perceptions, and likelihood to recommend — benchmarked against named competitors. An AI follow-up interview probes why respondents rate the brand as they do, surfacing the perceptions behind the numbers for marketing and brand teams running health trackers.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
When you think of (Replace with your product category, e.g. 'running shoes'), what is the first brand that comes to mind?
Which of these brands have you heard of, even if you've never used them?
- Your Brand (Replace with your brand name)
- Competitor A (Replace with competitor name)
- Competitor B (Replace with competitor name)
- Competitor C (Replace with competitor name)
How familiar are you with (Replace with your brand name)?
If you needed (Replace with your product category) today, how likely would you be to consider (Replace with your brand name)?
How likely are you to recommend (Replace with your brand name) to a friend or colleague?
How well does each phrase describe each brand?
- Innovative
- Trustworthy
- High quality
- Good value for money
- Relevant to people like me
Imagine you had to choose one of these brands right now. Split 100 points across them based on how likely you'd be to pick each one.
- Your Brand (Replace with your brand name)
- Competitor A (Replace with competitor name)
- Competitor B (Replace with competitor name)
- Competitor C (Replace with competitor name)
- None of these
In the last 30 days, how many times have you purchased or used (Replace with your brand name)?
- Never
- Once
- 2-3 times
- 4 or more times
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation likelihood and their point allocation across brands: what specifically makes the brand feel more or less trustworthy, innovative, or worth choosing compared to the named competitors. If they gave the brand a low recommendation score or allocated it few points, dig into the specific experience, perception, or comparison that's holding them back, and ask what would need to change to move them.
Which age range do you fall into?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Which gender do you identify with?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into our brand health tracker and help guide where we invest in awareness and product experience next.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Combines unaided and aided awareness (open text plus a multi-brand recognition checklist) with familiarity, consideration, and recommendation scales in one flow
- Includes a matrix question for attribute perceptions and a constant-sum exercise forcing respondents to split preference points across competitor brands, giving richer trade-off data than single-scale questions
- An AI follow-up interview specifically probes the reasoning behind a respondent's recommendation likelihood and brand perceptions, surfacing the 'why' that static scales can't capture
- Captures recent purchase/usage frequency and demographics, then auto-compiles everything into a brand health report for marketing teams, without a researcher manually coding open-ends
SurveyMonkey
Brand Power Score Survey TemplateThis is a directly comparable, ready-to-field template covering similar brand-tracking metrics (awareness, consideration, etc.). It benefits from SurveyMonkey's mature distribution and analytics tools, but questions are fixed once launched. There's no mechanism to dynamically probe an individual respondent's open-ended reasoning.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built brand tracking template with a similar metric set to ours
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established panel and distribution options
- Established survey logic and reporting dashboards
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual reasoning
- No voice-based interview option
- No published prompt-level methodology since there's no AI interviewing component
Jotform
Brand Awareness Survey Form TemplateA customizable, fielding-ready form focused on brand awareness rather than the fuller brand-power funnel (consideration, loyalty, competitive benchmarking). Jotform's strength is its drag-and-drop form builder and integrations, but it functions as a standard form rather than an interview experience.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization of questions and branding
- Wide integration ecosystem typical of Jotform forms
- Quick to deploy for basic awareness measurement
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — respondents answer fixed fields only
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No voice AI interview capability
SurveySparrow
Brand Awareness Survey TemplateSurveySparrow presents its survey in a conversational, chat-like interface, which makes it feel more engaging than a plain form. However, the conversational style is a fixed UI pattern, not a true adaptive interview that reasons about each answer and generates new follow-up questions.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that can improve completion rates
- Mobile-friendly chat-style presentation
- Template covers core brand awareness questions out of the box
아쉬운 점
- Conversational UI is scripted, not an AI system generating dynamic follow-ups based on responses
- No voice interview mode
- No transparent, inspectable prompt logic since there's no AI interviewing involved
Typeform
Brand Awareness Survey TemplateTypeform offers a polished, one-question-at-a-time template well-suited to basic brand awareness capture, with simple conditional logic. It doesn't extend into consideration, loyalty, or competitive benchmarking depth, and it lacks any AI-driven follow-up capability.
잘하는 점
- Clean, well-designed respondent experience with strong completion rates
- Basic conditional logic for branching between questions
- Simple to customize for quick awareness studies
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to explore the reasoning behind ratings
- No automated quality scoring of responses
- No voice AI interview option
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
소셜 미디어 커뮤니티 안전 및 신뢰 설문
팔로워들이 브랜드의 소셜 미디어 커뮤니티(댓글, 답글, DM)에 참여할 때 얼마나 안전하고 존중받으며 괴롭힘이나 스팸으로부터 자유롭다고 느끼는지를 측정합니다. 단순한 감정 점수 이상을 필요로 하는 소셜 미디어 및 커뮤니티 관리자를 위해 만들어졌으며, AI 후속 인터뷰가 특정 안전 경험을 재구성하여 모더레이션에서 정확히 무엇을 개선해야 하는지 알려줍니다.
템플릿 보기Marketing Claims and Messaging Testing Survey
Tests how believable, relevant, and differentiating your candidate marketing claims are, using a best-worst trade-off to force priority among competing lines and an AI follow-up that digs into why the top claim landed or fell flat. Built for brand, product marketing, and comms teams validating messaging before a campaign launch.
템플릿 보기Social Media Content Consent & Comfort Survey
Explores how comfortable customers are when brands reshare their photos, tags, reviews, or comments in marketing — and what would make them more willing to say yes. Built for marketing, social, and legal teams shaping user-generated-content and permission policies, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment someone felt uneasy or declined.
템플릿 보기Brand Pulse: Attribute Perception Tracker
Tracks how your brand is perceived on key attributes like trust, quality, and value, and identifies which of those attributes actually drive choice through a best-worst trade-off exercise. An AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind the respondent's lowest-rated attribute. Built for brand and marketing teams running recurring pulse checks.
템플릿 보기Advertising Effectiveness & Ad Recall Survey
Measures whether a specific ad gets noticed, understood, and acted on — covering recall, message takeaway, creative appeal, and purchase intent — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real reasons behind stated purchase intent instead of taking the number at face value. Built for marketers testing a campaign, creative concept, or media placement.
템플릿 보기Mobile App Store Rating Drivers Study
Identifies what actually pushes users toward 5-star versus 1-star app store reviews — crashes, speed, ads, pricing, support — and what specifically would change their rating. Built for product and growth teams; the AI follow-up reconstructs the real incident behind each respondent's rating instead of generic complaints.
템플릿 보기