AI Agent Autonomy, Escalation & Control Preferences Survey
Measures user expectations for AI agent autonomy, preferred escalation and handoff mechanisms, permissible actions, spending thresholds, and risk concerns. Designed for UX researchers and product teams building agentic AI workflows.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the past 30 days, how often have you used any AI assistant (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Siri, Alexa)?
- Daily
- A few times a week
- About once a week
- A few times this month
- I have not used an AI assistant
The next few questions ask about specific behaviors an AI agent might exhibit. For each, please rate how important that behavior is to you.
By default, how much autonomy should an AI agent have when performing tasks in your workflow?
What concerns, if any, do you have about AI agents? (Select all that apply.)
- Privacy or data leakage
- Inaccuracies (hallucinations)
- Bias or unfair outcomes
- Security vulnerabilities
- Compliance or legal risk
- Unexpected costs or overuse
- Loss of personal skill or over-reliance
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
Overall, how much do you trust AI agents to carry out tasks on your behalf?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you'd like to share about your expectations or preferences for AI agents?
Finally, a few optional questions about you to help us understand patterns across different groups.
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to help improve AI agent design for everyone.
How important is it that an AI agent explains its reasoning before taking action?
When an AI agent is unsure about the correct action or detects a potential risk, what should it do first?
- Pause and escalate to a human immediately
- Ask me to review and approve the specific action
- Flag the uncertainty but continue with its best judgment
- Continue autonomously unless I intervene
- Other (please specify)
We'd like to explore your experiences with AI agents in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about situations where an AI agent met or fell short of your expectations.
What is your age range?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent asks for your confirmation before performing irreversible actions?
If an AI agent escalates an issue to a human, which handoff method(s) would you prefer? (Select all that apply.)
- Live chat with a human agent
- Open a support ticket
- Email a specialist
- Phone call
- Schedule a callback
- Forward to my team or shared inbox
- Other (please specify)
In which region do you primarily live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent cites sources or evidence for its claims?
What is the maximum amount you would allow an AI agent to spend on a single purchase without your approval?
- $0 – always require my approval
- $1–$25
- $26–$100
- $101–$500
- $501–$1,000
- More than $1,000
- Not applicable – my agent would not make purchases
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or vocational training
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent learns and improves from your corrections over time?
During longer tasks, how often should the AI agent send you status updates?
- Only when the task is complete
- At major milestones or decision points
- At regular intervals (e.g., every few minutes)
- After every individual step
- I don't need status updates
What is your current employment status?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Not employed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
How important is it that an AI agent stays strictly within the scope of tasks you have assigned?
Which of the following actions, if any, should an AI agent be allowed to perform without asking you first? (Select all that apply.)
- Draft but do not send messages
- Send emails to internal recipients
- Schedule calendar events
- Browse and read web pages
- Access non-sensitive files
- Run code in a sandbox
- Create tickets or tasks
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
엔터테인먼트 챗봇 참여도 및 만족도 설문조사
사람들이 엔터테인먼트 챗봇(친구 역할, 롤플레이, 유머, 스토리텔링)을 얼마나 자주 사용하는지, 무엇이 재방문을 유도하는지, 그리고 경험이 어디에서 기대에 못 미치는지를 측정합니다. 또한 AI 후속 질문을 통해 기억에 남는 특정 대화를 재구성하여 실제로 무엇이 재미있고, 그럴듯하며, 혹은 실망스러웠는지를 드러냅니다. 캐릭터 또는 엔터테인먼트 중심의 AI 경험을 출시하는 제품 및 콘텐츠 팀을 위해 제작되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Flight Booking Chatbot Usability & Trust Survey
Evaluates how well an airline or travel site's AI chatbot handles real booking, change, and support tasks — covering task completion, trust, and where users bail out to a human. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs exactly what happened in the respondent's most recent chatbot session, not just how they'd rate it in hindsight.
템플릿 보기Doctor Appointment Chatbot Experience Survey
Measures how well an AI scheduling chatbot helps patients book, reschedule, or get answers about medical appointments, covering task completion, trust, and friction points — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment the chatbot helped or failed.
템플릿 보기AI Tool Adoption in Research Teams
A survey studying how research teams evaluate, adopt, and integrate AI tools for data collection, analysis, and reporting. This instrument measures current tool usage, evaluation criteria, adoption barriers, training experiences, data quality perceptions, and team collaboration patterns.
템플릿 보기AI Adoption in Higher Education
A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.
템플릿 보기AI Refusal Message Clarity & Tone Evaluation
A stimulus-comparison survey for UX researchers and AI product teams to evaluate the clarity, tone, and helpfulness of AI safety and refusal messages. Produces actionable data on user preferences and improvement priorities.
템플릿 보기