모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Business Requirements Gathering & Prioritization Survey

Helps business analysts capture stakeholder pain points, desired capabilities, and success criteria for a new system or process change. Includes a prioritization exercise and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single most important requirement — surfacing the workaround, cost, or risk behind it that a checkbox answer would miss.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to help scope this project! Your input shapes what gets built and in what order. About 6-8 minutes, and there are no wrong answers — we want your honest experience with how things work today.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your relationship to this project?

  • Business or functional stakeholder
  • End user / day-to-day operator
  • Technical or IT stakeholder
  • Sponsor or decision-maker
  • Other
Q03
장문형필수

Describe how you currently handle (Replace with the task/workflow this project addresses, e.g., 'processing expense reimbursements'). Walk through the steps as you'd explain them to a new hire.

Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about the current process or system?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • It's fast enough for what I need to get done
  • It gives me accurate, trustworthy information
  • I rarely have to redo work or fix errors
  • I can complete tasks without asking IT or another team for help
  • It's easy to find or report the information I need
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Of the capabilities being considered for this project, which matters most and least to you? (Template note: replace the options below with the actual candidate features or requirements for your project.)

  • (Replace with capability A, e.g., real-time reporting)
  • (Replace with capability B, e.g., mobile access)
  • (Replace with capability C, e.g., automated approvals)
  • (Replace with capability D, e.g., single sign-on)
  • (Replace with capability E, e.g., audit trail/history)
  • (Replace with capability F, e.g., bulk data import)
  • (Replace with capability G, e.g., custom notifications)
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q06
의견 척도필수

How disruptive would it be to your work if this project were delayed by six months?

척도: 010
최소:No disruption at all최대:Extremely disruptive
Q07
점수 배분필수

You have 100 points to distribute across these priorities based on what matters most for the new solution. Allocate more points to what matters more.

  • Ease of use
  • Speed and performance
  • Reporting and analytics
  • Integration with other tools/systems
  • Cost to implement and maintain
100점 배분
Q08
객관식필수

What would tell you this project succeeded, six months after launch?

  • Faster turnaround time
  • Fewer errors or rework
  • Better visibility or reporting
  • Less manual, repetitive work
  • Improved compliance or audit-readiness
  • Other
Q09
단문형

Are there any constraints we should factor in — budget, deadline, compliance rules, or systems it must work with?

Q10
AI 인터뷰

Identify the single requirement or capability the respondent ranked highest (from the prioritization exercise or constant-sum allocation) and probe the concrete story behind it: what specifically goes wrong or takes too long today, how often it happens, and what workaround they currently use. If they described a delay as highly disruptive, ask what breaks first and who else is affected. Push past vague answers like 'it would help a lot' to get a specific example from the last 30 days.

Q11
객관식

Which team or department are you part of? (Optional)

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • (Replace with Department D)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been in your current role? (Optional)

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the detail! Your answers feed directly into the requirements document and priority list for this project, and may be quoted (anonymously) to explain why a feature made the cut.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a dedicated prioritization exercise (max-diff plus a constant-sum point allocation) so stakeholders reveal trade-offs, not just ranked lists
  • Pairs a matrix on current-process pain points with an open-ended workflow description, capturing both structured and narrative context
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview focused specifically on the respondent's top-ranked requirement, probing for the workaround, cost, or risk a checkbox answer would miss
  • Closes with success-criteria and constraints questions (budget, deadline, compliance) so the report ties directly to project scoping decisions

SurveySparrow

Business Analyst Requirement Gathering Template

A fielding-ready template built for the same core use case: collecting stakeholder requirements for a business analyst. It likely covers standard question types (multiple choice, text, rating) for capturing needs and priorities, but appears to rely on static, pre-set questions rather than adaptive probing. No mention of a structured prioritization exercise like max-diff or point allocation.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for business analyst requirement gathering, so terminology and flow should feel familiar to BAs
  • Part of a broader SurveySparrow template library, suggesting easy customization and integration with their survey platform
  • Likely supports standard branding and distribution features common to mature survey tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig deeper into a respondent's top priority — likely a fixed set of questions for every respondent
  • No visible prioritization mechanism (max-diff, constant-sum) to force trade-off thinking between competing requirements
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or synthesized into a report, unlike QuestionPunk's transparent prompts and automated quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Monthly Employee Happiness Check-In

A recurring pulse that tracks overall happiness and satisfaction across work, relationships, health, and growth month over month, with an AI follow-up that digs into whichever area is driving the score up or down. Built for HR and people teams running a lightweight monthly wellbeing cadence. Takes about 4 minutes.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Central America Map & Capitals Knowledge Quiz

A geography knowledge check covering the seven countries of Central America — capitals, borders, coastlines, and relative position — built for educators, trainers, and content teams assessing baseline map literacy. An AI follow-up interview digs into how respondents reasoned through the trickiest matches and where their mental map of the region breaks down.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Stakeholder Satisfaction & Relationship Health Survey

Measures how satisfied external and internal stakeholders (board members, funders, suppliers, community partners) are with your organization's communication, transparency, and responsiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision behind their rating instead of settling for a generic score.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Pumpkin Carving Party RSVP & Planning Survey

A festive RSVP and planning tool for hosts throwing a pumpkin carving party — captures attendance, headcount, dietary needs, and activity preferences, plus an AI follow-up that digs into what would make the night genuinely memorable for each guest so hosts can plan beyond the basics.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

회사 워크숍 피드백 및 향후 기획 설문

직원들이 최근 회사 워크숍을 실제로 어떻게 경험했는지 — 참석 여부, 만족도, 그리고 어떤 프로그램이 좋았는지 — 를 파악하고, 낮은 참여도나 미온적인 평가 뒤에 숨은 진짜 이유를 파고드는 AI 후속 질문을 통해 다음 행사 기획 시 예산을 더 효율적으로 사용할 수 있도록 돕습니다.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Media Request Response Experience Survey

Measures how journalists, freelancers, and other media professionals experience submitting interview, quote, or information requests to your press team — response speed, accuracy, and whether they got what they needed. An AI follow-up reconstructs exactly what happened on their most recent request, surfacing where the process broke down. Built for communications and media relations teams.

템플릿 보기