QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Research

Competitive Landscape & Switching Drivers Survey

Benchmarks how customers perceive your brand against named competitors — consideration, head-to-head ratings, and switching likelihood — then uses an AI follow-up interview to surface the real story behind a preference or switch. Built for product marketing, competitive intelligence, and strategy teams tracking share of consideration.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your perspective on the market! We're trying to understand how you see us compared to other options out there — there are no wrong answers. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which of the following companies have you seriously considered, gotten a quote from, or used in the last 12 months? (Template note: replace the names below with your real competitor set before launching.)

  • (Your Brand)
  • (Replace with Competitor A)
  • (Replace with Competitor B)
  • (Replace with Competitor C)
Q03
객관식필수

Which one of these do you currently rely on the most for this need?

  • (Your Brand)
  • (Replace with Competitor A)
  • (Replace with Competitor B)
  • (Replace with Competitor C)
  • Don't currently use any of these
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you're comparing providers like these, which factors matter most to you? (Template note: adjust this list to match the real factors in your category.)

  • Price or value for money
  • Product or service quality
  • Customer support responsiveness
  • Ease of getting started
  • Reliability and uptime
  • Brand reputation
  • Flexibility of contracts or plans
  • Speed of implementation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q05
매트릭스필수

Thinking about (Your Brand) versus the competitor you rely on most, how do we compare on each of the following?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Price / value for money
  • Product or service quality
  • Customer support
  • Ease of use
  • Reliability
열: Much worse than them · Somewhat worse · About the same · Somewhat better · Much better than them
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to switch away from your current primary provider in the next 12 months?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
점수 배분필수

If you had to split a $100 budget among these providers based on how likely you'd be to choose each one today, how would you divide it?

  • (Your Brand)
  • (Replace with Competitor A)
  • (Replace with Competitor B)
  • (Replace with Competitor C)
  • Someone else entirely
100점 배분
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind how the respondent split their budget and their stated switching likelihood. If most of the budget went to a competitor, dig into the specific trigger event or dealbreaker that pushed them there and what it would take to win the budget back. If most went to (Your Brand), confirm what's actually protecting that loyalty versus what's just inertia, and ask what would make them look elsewhere despite that.

Q09
장문형

Is there one thing a competitor does noticeably better than we do that you wish we matched?

Q10
객관식

Which best describes your role in choosing between providers like these?

  • Final decision-maker
  • Strong influence on the decision
  • One voice among several
  • I mostly use what's already chosen
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
드롭다운

What's the approximate size of your organization?

  • Just me / freelance
  • 2-50 employees
  • 51-500 employees
  • 501-5,000 employees
  • 5,000+ employees
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into how we track our position against the competition, and which gaps we prioritize closing first.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs a quantitative comparison (consideration, current provider, MaxDiff on decision factors, head-to-head matrix ratings, and a $100 constant-sum budget split) with an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes why respondents allocated their budget the way they did and what's behind a switch
  • Includes an open-ended question on what a competitor does noticeably better, which the AI interview can dig into in real time instead of collecting a flat text answer
  • Segments results by role in the buying decision and organization size, so competitive intelligence and product marketing teams can slice share-of-consideration data by buyer type
  • Every AI probe follows a transparent, disclosed prompt, and responses get an automated quality score, so teams can trust the qualitative data feeding competitive reports

SurveyMonkey

Competitor Research Survey Template & Questions

A ready-to-field template with a standard set of competitor-awareness and rating questions, backed by SurveyMonkey's large distribution and panel infrastructure. It's built for broad benchmarking rather than deep, brand-specific switching narratives. Good starting point if you mainly need static ratings at scale rather than the 'why' behind them.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey distribution and panel reach
  • Large question/template library for quick setup
  • Familiar builder for teams already on SurveyMonkey

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to explore switching reasons
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published methodology for how questions were derived

SurveySparrow

Competitor Research Survey Template

A conversational, chat-style template covering competitor awareness and preference questions, fielding-ready out of the box. Its strength is presentation and multi-channel delivery rather than probing deeper into individual responses. Best suited to teams wanting a friendlier survey feel without needing follow-up depth.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style question flow
  • Multi-channel distribution options
  • Quick-start marketing-focused template

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to follow up on an answer like a switch or budget split
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No transparent prompt or scoring methodology published

Typeform

Competitor Research Survey Template

A well-designed, fielding-ready template known for Typeform's clean one-question-at-a-time interface, which tends to boost completion on comparison-style questions. It covers standard competitive research ground but stops at the answer given, with no mechanism to explore the reasoning behind it. Strong for engagement, lighter on depth.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, high-completion-rate UX
  • Simple drag-and-drop customization
  • Good mobile-friendly design

아쉬운 점

  • No AI follow-up or voice interview to surface the reasoning behind ratings or switching intent
  • No automated quality scoring of open responses
  • No disclosed prompt or methodology transparency

자주 묻는 질문

“Competitive Landscape & Switching Drivers Survey” 템플릿에는 어떤 질문이 포함되어 있나요?

바로 사용할 수 있는 질문 12개가 포함되어 있으며, 처음 질문은 다음과 같습니다: “Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your perspective on the market! We're trying to understand how you see us compa…” · “Which of the following companies have you seriously considered, gotten a quote from, or used in the last 12 months? (Tem…” · “Which one of these do you currently rely on the most for this need?”. 전체 질문은 위에서 미리 볼 수 있고 모두 수정 가능합니다.

이 설문을 완료하는 데 얼마나 걸리나요?

응답자는 보통 질문 12개를 약 7분 안에 완료합니다.

템플릿을 수정할 수 있나요?

네. 설문을 공개하기 전에 모든 질문, 답변 옵션, 순서를 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다. 질문을 추가·삭제하거나 AI 편집기에 연구 목표에 맞춘 재구성을 요청할 수도 있습니다.

이 템플릿은 무료인가요?

네. 편집기에서 바로 열어 수정을 시작할 수 있습니다. 체험에는 계정이 필요 없으며, 무료 플랜으로 설문을 공개할 수 있습니다.

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

이 템플릿 사용하기무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

비슷한 주제의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Research

Sensitive Topic List Experiment (Item Count)

Measure behaviors people won't admit directly: the list experiment (item count technique) asks only HOW MANY statements apply — never which — so individual answers stay genuinely deniable while group comparisons reveal the true rate. The native question type randomizes control and treatment lists for you.

템플릿 보기
Research

Competitive Perception vs Named Competitors Survey

Benchmarks how customers and prospects rate you against specific named competitors on the criteria that actually drive their choice — combining a max-diff prioritization, a head-to-head perception battery, and an AI follow-up that digs into the exact moment a competitor won or nearly won the deal.

템플릿 보기
Research

경쟁 소매점 비교 설문조사

가격, 상품 구색, 서비스, 편의성 측면에서 귀사의 매장을 지목된 경쟁사와 벤치마킹한 후, AI 후속 질문을 통해 쇼핑객이 특정 매장을 다른 매장보다 선택한 구체적인 순간을 재구성합니다. 지갑 점유율(share-of-wallet)과 경쟁적 포지셔닝을 추적하는 소매 인사이트 팀을 위해 제작되었습니다.

템플릿 보기
Research

경쟁사 대비 Net Promoter 벤치마크 설문조사

두 서비스를 모두 사용하는 고객을 대상으로 귀사의 Net Promoter Score를 지목된 경쟁사와 비교하여 벤치마킹한 후, AI 후속 질문을 활용하여 그 격차를 벌리거나 좁히는 구체적인 순간을 밝혀냅니다. 단일 수치 이상의 것이 필요한 CX 및 제품 팀을 위해 설계되었으며, 고객이 왜 전환하려 하는지(또는 하지 않으려 하는지)를 알 수 있도록 합니다.

템플릿 보기
Research

Brand Health & Competitive Benchmarking Survey

Measures unaided and aided brand awareness, image associations, value perceptions, purchase intent, and NPS against key competitors to benchmark brand health and identify competitive positioning opportunities.

템플릿 보기
Research

Apple vs Samsung 브랜드 선호도 및 전환 설문

현재 Apple 및 Samsung 기기 사용자가 각 브랜드를 카메라, 배터리, 소프트웨어, 디자인, 가성비 측면에서 어떻게 평가하는지 비교하고, best-worst 트레이드오프와 점수 배분을 통해 실제 구매 결정을 이끄는 요인을 드러냅니다. AI 후속 인터뷰가 브랜드 충성도 또는 전환 계획의 실제 계기를 심층적으로 파고듭니다. 모바일 브랜드 및 제품 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기