Graduation Exit Survey: Satisfaction & Career Readiness
Captures graduating students' satisfaction with their program, how prepared they feel for their next step, and where the institution should invest next — built for registrars, program directors, and career services teams closing out a cohort. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasons behind low preparedness or satisfaction scores instead of stopping at a number.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What credential are you completing?
- Associate's degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctoral degree
- Certificate or diploma program
What was your major or field of study?
Overall, how satisfied are you with your academic program?
How would you rate each part of your program experience?
- Quality of instruction
- Curriculum relevance to your career goals
- Career services and job placement support
- Access to faculty and academic advisors
- Campus facilities and resources
- 외 1개
What are your plans immediately after graduation?
- Starting a job I already have secured
- Still actively job searching
- Continuing to further education
- Starting my own business
- Taking time off before deciding next steps
How prepared do you feel for your next step, whether that's a career or further education?
Which of these areas most needs improvement for future students?
- Career services and job placement support
- Academic advising
- Course offerings and curriculum relevance
- Internships and hands-on experience opportunities
- Faculty accessibility and mentorship
- Mental health and wellness resources
- Networking and alumni connections
- Affordability and financial aid guidance
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's preparedness rating and their top improvement pick: ask for a specific moment or experience (a class, an advising session, an internship search) that shaped how prepared they feel. If they rated preparedness low, find out what concretely was missing — a skill, a connection, feedback, hands-on practice — and what they wish had happened earlier in the program rather than at the end.
How likely are you to recommend this program to a friend or colleague considering a similar path?
Looking back, what's one thing that would have made your experience significantly better?
What is your age range?
- Under 20
- 20-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45 or older
- Prefer not to say
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
Thank you, and congratulations again! Your responses will be compiled into a report the program team uses to improve courses, advising, and career support for the next graduating class.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview step that probes the reasoning behind low preparedness or satisfaction ratings instead of stopping at a number
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales, matrix ratings, max-diff prioritization) with open-ended reflection questions to give registrars and career services both scores and context
- Captures forward-looking data (post-graduation plans, top improvement areas) alongside satisfaction, making it useful for both cohort close-out reporting and program investment decisions
- Auto-generates a report from responses, saving registrars and program directors manual analysis work
QuestionPro
Graduation exit survey - Sample questionnaire templateA directly comparable static questionnaire covering satisfaction and post-graduation plans, built on QuestionPro's survey platform. It's a fielding-ready template but relies on fixed question sets rather than adaptive probing. Good starting point for teams wanting a straightforward, editable exit survey.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the graduation exit survey use case
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad distribution/logic features
- Likely easy to customize question wording and branching within their editor
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into low scores—responses stay at the fixed-question level
- No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative capture
- No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
Jotform
Post-Graduation Career Outcome Survey Form TemplateThis template focuses specifically on career outcomes after graduation, built in Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's a static form suited for tracking employment/further-study status rather than a full satisfaction-and-readiness exit survey. Useful if the primary goal is outcome tracking rather than program feedback.
잘하는 점
- Easy-to-use drag-and-drop builder for quick customization
- Focused specifically on career/employment outcome tracking
- Integrates with Jotform's broader forms ecosystem (payments, workflows, etc.)
아쉬운 점
- Narrower scope on career outcomes—lacks the program satisfaction, matrix experience ratings, and improvement-prioritization depth
- No AI-driven follow-up questioning to explore the 'why' behind responses
- No automated quality scoring or transparent AI prompt design
Typeform
Post-Graduation Career Outcome Survey TemplateTypeform's version emphasizes a conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface for gathering post-graduation career data. It's visually polished and easy for respondents to complete, but the flow is still a fixed, static question sequence rather than a dynamic interview. Best for engagement-focused outcome surveys, not deep qualitative diagnosis.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, visually engaging one-question format that can improve completion rates
- Simple to brand and customize for institutional look-and-feel
- Good for lightweight, quick-turnaround outcome surveys
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview—logic branching is rule-based, not reasoning-based follow-up
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt documentation
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
University Exit Experience & Outcomes Survey
For students leaving a university — whether they graduated, withdrew, or transferred — this survey captures how they rate teaching, advising, support services, and overall value, then uses an AI follow-up interview to dig into the real story behind their satisfaction score instead of settling for a flat rating.
템플릿 보기U.S. Presidential Approval & Trust Tracker
Tracks how the public rates the current President's overall performance, trust, and handling of specific issues like the economy and foreign policy — for pollsters, newsrooms, and researchers who need a quick pulse read. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific event or issue actually driving each respondent's rating, not just the label they picked.
템플릿 보기Post-Stay Hotel Guest Experience Survey
Captures how guests rated check-in, room quality, staff, and value after a recent stay, plus their likelihood to recommend and rebook. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real story behind their score — what made or broke the stay — so hotel teams get specifics, not just star ratings.
템플릿 보기Employee Work-Life Balance Assessment
Measures how well employees are able to separate work from personal life, where the biggest pressure points come from (workload, schedule unpredictability, always-on culture), and how supported they feel by managers. The AI follow-up digs into the single most disruptive factor each person names, surfacing a concrete recent example instead of a vague complaint.
템플릿 보기Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey
Gathers structured peer feedback on a specific colleague's collaboration, reliability, and communication habits, plus a best-worst ranking of their standout strengths. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example behind the ratings, so the feedback reads as evidence, not just scores.
템플릿 보기Video Game Difficulty, Progression & Monetization Feedback
Captures how players actually experience difficulty tuning, progression pacing, monetization fairness, and moment-to-moment session enjoyment. Built for game designers and live-ops teams tracking post-launch sentiment, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment a player felt cheated by difficulty or monetization instead of a generic complaint.
템플릿 보기