Job Evaluation and Role Scope Assessment
A point-factor job evaluation questionnaire for HR and compensation teams grading or re-grading a role — covering decision authority, supervisory scope, effort, and working conditions, with an AI follow-up that pressure-tests the scoring against a real high-stakes task the job has actually handled.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
What is the exact job title of the role you're evaluating?
In 1-2 sentences, what is the main purpose of this job — why does the role exist?
How often does this job involve each of the following?
- Managing a budget or financial resources
- Supervising or directing the work of others
- Solving unique or non-routine problems
- Interacting directly with external customers or clients
- Operating or maintaining equipment or machinery
- 외 1개
How much independent judgment does this job require when making decisions?
How many people does this job directly supervise?
- None
- 1-3
- 4-10
- 11-25
- More than 25
What is the minimum education or qualification typically required to perform this job competently?
- No formal qualification required
- High school diploma or equivalent
- Vocational or trade certification
- Bachelor's degree
- Postgraduate or professional degree
Using 100 points total, allocate them across these four factors based on how much each contributes to this job's overall difficulty and value. This is the core of a point-factor job evaluation, so take your time.
- Skill and knowledge required
- Effort (mental and physical)
- Responsibility and accountability
- Working conditions and environment
Rate how much of each factor this job demands.
- Complexity of tasks performed
- Physical effort required
- Mental or emotional effort required
- Consequence of errors or poor decisions
- Exposure to unpleasant or hazardous conditions
Reconstruct the single most complex or high-stakes task this job has required in recent memory: what the situation was, what options were available, and what would have gone wrong with a bad decision. Use it to sanity-check whether the point allocation and factor ratings above — especially responsibility and complexity — actually match the real scope of the work, and flag any mismatch you notice.
Compared to its actual scope of work, how do you think this job's current pay grade or level fits?
- Under-graded — scope exceeds current level
- Fits well
- Over-graded — current level exceeds scope
- Not sure / not applicable
Which department is this job part of? (Template note: replace with your organization's department list before launching.)
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you personally held or supervised this job?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10+ years
- Prefer not to say
All done — thank you. Your responses feed into a job evaluation panel that scores and grades this role against others in the organization.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Combines quantitative point-factor scoring (a 100-point allocation across four compensable factors plus a slider matrix rating factor demands) with qualitative context on the job's actual purpose and duties, giving compensation teams both a defensible number and the reasoning behind it.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to reconstruct the single most complex or high-stakes task the job has handled, then pressure-tests whether the point-factor scores actually match that real-world evidence rather than self-reported impressions.
- Covers the full standard job evaluation dimensions in one flow — decision-making judgment, direct supervisory scope, minimum qualification level, frequency of key demands, and perceived pay-grade fit — so HR doesn't need to stitch together multiple generic forms.
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean panel members get a structured summary of each grading submission rather than raw open-text answers to manually synthesize.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
University Graduate Exit Experience Poll
Captures how graduating students rate their academics, career readiness, and campus life as they head out the door, plus their post-graduation plans and likelihood to recommend the school. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision behind their lowest-rated aspect instead of settling for a generic score. Built for institutional research and student affairs teams running exit polls each term.
템플릿 보기Personal Values & Life Priorities Assessment
Surfaces what people genuinely value most — career, family, health, growth, community, freedom — and how closely their daily choices match those priorities. Useful for coaches, HR teams, and researchers studying wellbeing or culture fit. The AI follow-up interview digs into the story behind a respondent's top value and any gap between stated priorities and lived time.
템플릿 보기Disaster Preparedness and Response Readiness Survey
Assesses how prepared people actually felt, what emergency communications and procedures worked, and where gaps showed up during a real event or drill. Built for emergency management teams, facilities, and HSE departments benchmarking readiness, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs exactly what happened during the respondent's most recent disaster or drill instead of relying on general perceptions.
템플릿 보기Physician Practice Patient Experience Survey
Captures how patients experience a physician practice end-to-end — scheduling ease, wait times, physician communication, and likelihood to recommend — with an AI follow-up that digs into the 'why' behind recommendation scores, especially from patients who were lukewarm or dissatisfied. Built for practice managers and physician groups tracking patient experience.
템플릿 보기음주운전 행동 및 예방 태도 설문조사
사람들이 음주 후 실제로 운전 여부를 어떻게 결정하는지, 어떤 대안을 이용하는지, 어떤 장애 요인이 방해가 되는지, 그리고 그 위험을 실제로 얼마나 크게 인식하는지를 탐구합니다. 예방 캠페인을 설계하는 교통안전 기관, 고용주, 주점, 차량 공유 또는 보험 프로그램을 위해 만들어졌습니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 가상의 선의가 아닌 마지막 실제 결정 순간을 재구성합니다.
템플릿 보기Product & System Compatibility Testing Feedback Survey
Captures how well a product, device, or software integrates with a customer's existing tech stack, workflows, and environments — for IT, engineering, and procurement teams running vendor or upgrade compatibility evaluations. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single worst compatibility issue found, reconstructing exactly what broke and what workaround (if any) was used.
템플릿 보기