Job Content and Role Fit Survey
Measures how satisfied employees are with the substance of their job — the tasks, autonomy, variety, skill fit, and workload — separate from pay or manager quality. Built for HR and people-ops teams running role-design reviews, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific task or moment behind their lowest-rated aspect of the work.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How long have you been in your current role?
- Less than 3 months
- 3-12 months
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
Overall, how satisfied are you with the actual day-to-day work you do (the tasks themselves, not the team or pay)?
How would you rate each of the following aspects of your current role?
- Variety in your daily tasks
- Autonomy over how you do your work
- How well the role uses your top skills
- Pace and workload
- Meaningfulness of the work
- 외 1개
Which of these matter most to you in a role, and which matter least?
- Autonomy over how I do my work
- Variety in daily tasks
- Using my top skills and strengths
- Meaningful, purposeful work
- Manageable workload and pace
- Opportunities to learn and grow
- Recognition for good work
- Clear expectations and goals
How manageable is your current workload on a typical week?
In the last 30 days, how often did you feel genuinely engaged in your work (not bored, not overwhelmed)?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Almost always
Identify the aspect of the role the respondent rated lowest in the ratings battery (variety, autonomy, skill use, pace, meaningfulness, or clarity) and ask them to walk through a specific recent week or task where that gap showed up most clearly. Probe what got in the way, whether it's structural (workload, tools, decision rights) or situational, and what a realistic fix would look like. If they rated everything highly, ask what one task they'd remove or add to make the role even better.
If you could change one specific task or responsibility in your role, what would it be?
Which department or function are you part of? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual department list before launching.)
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Customer Support
- People/HR
- (Replace with department D)
- Prefer not to say
Which best describes your seniority level?
- Entry-level
- Mid-level
- Senior
- Manager
- Director or above
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you for the honest reflection! Your responses feed into a report on where roles can be redesigned to better fit the people doing them.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Includes a matrix and opinion-scale battery covering tasks, autonomy, variety, skill fit, and workload as distinct dimensions, separate from pay or manager quality
- Pairs a MaxDiff exercise (what matters most/least in a role) with an AI follow-up interview that automatically digs into the respondent's lowest-rated aspect for concrete detail
- Captures a specific, actionable change via the short-text 'one task you'd change' question, turning low scores into a concrete task or moment rather than a vague complaint
- Segments results by department, seniority, and tenure out of the box so HR/people-ops can slice role-fit findings for a role-design review without rebuilding the survey
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Workplace Gender Discrimination Climate Survey
Measures how often employees experience or witness gender-based discrimination — in pay, promotion, meetings, and everyday treatment — and how safe they feel speaking up. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific incident in the respondent's own words, revealing what actually happened and what response would have felt fair, for HR and DEI teams benchmarking climate and prioritizing fixes.
템플릿 보기Retail Shopping and Product Search Behavior Survey
Maps how shoppers browse, search, and decide across in-store, online, and marketplace channels — where product searches succeed or break down, which purchase factors carry the most weight, and what an AI follow-up interview uncovers about the last time someone couldn't find what they wanted. Built for retail, e-commerce, and merchandising teams optimizing search, navigation, and discovery.
템플릿 보기Work From Home Efficiency and Productivity Survey
Measures how productive, focused, and supported employees feel while working remotely, and pinpoints the specific barriers eating into their day. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest barrier each person identifies, reconstructing a real recent workday instead of relying on generalized complaints.
템플릿 보기University Graduate Exit Experience Poll
Captures how graduating students rate their academics, career readiness, and campus life as they head out the door, plus their post-graduation plans and likelihood to recommend the school. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision behind their lowest-rated aspect instead of settling for a generic score. Built for institutional research and student affairs teams running exit polls each term.
템플릿 보기교수 강의 효과성 평가 설문
학생들이 명확성, 참여도, 피드백, 접근성, 공정성 측면에서 교수의 강의를 어떻게 경험하는지를 측정하며, 전반적인 만족도와 추천 의향도 함께 파악합니다. 학기말 평가를 진행하는 학과 및 강의 담당자를 위해 설계되었으며, 학생의 평가에 가장 큰 영향을 미친 특정 순간이나 과제를 깊이 있게 탐구하는 AI 후속 인터뷰가 포함되어 있습니다.
템플릿 보기Community Attitudes Toward Local Wind Energy Projects
Measures awareness, support, and concerns among residents near a wind energy project — covering noise, visual impact, trust in the developer, and perceived local benefits. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reason behind each respondent's level of support, giving developers and utilities the qualitative context behind the numbers before community meetings or permitting decisions.
템플릿 보기