Pharmacy Patient Safety Culture Survey (AHRQ-Aligned)
Assesses teamwork, communication openness, staffing adequacy, and response to mistakes in a pharmacy setting, modeled on AHRQ's patient safety culture framework. Built for pharmacy managers and quality leads, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a specific near-miss or error to surface the real contributing factors behind the ratings.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How much do you agree with the following statements about communication and teamwork in this pharmacy?
- Staff freely speak up if they see something that may negatively affect patient care.
- Pharmacy staff work together as an effective team.
- When one area of this pharmacy gets really busy, others help out.
- Staff feel comfortable asking questions when something does not seem right with a prescription.
How much do you agree with the following statements about staffing and how mistakes are handled here?
- Staff are treated fairly when they report a mistake.
- This pharmacy focuses on learning from mistakes rather than placing blame.
- We have enough staff to handle the workload safely.
- Staff feel rushed when processing prescriptions.
Overall, how would you rate the patient safety culture in this pharmacy?
In the past 12 months, how many medication errors or near misses have you personally reported?
- None
- 1-2
- 3-5
- 6-10
- More than 10
When a near miss occurs (an error caught before it reached the patient), how often is it reported through this pharmacy's formal reporting process?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Most of the time
- Always
Which of these changes would do the most to improve patient safety in this pharmacy?
- More staffing during peak hours
- A clearer, simpler error-reporting process
- Regular safety culture training
- Fewer interruptions and distractions during dispensing
- Better communication between shifts
- A non-punitive response when mistakes happen
- Standardized double-check procedures for high-risk prescriptions
Ask the respondent to walk through the most recent medication error or near miss they personally witnessed or were involved in: what happened, what contributing factors were present (staffing, distractions, workflow, communication), and whether it was reported. If it wasn't reported, probe specifically why not. If they say they've never experienced one, ask what would make them confident enough to report a hypothetical mistake without fear of blame.
What is one change that would make it easier for staff here to speak up about safety concerns or mistakes?
Now a few quick questions about your role — these help us compare results across positions and are entirely optional.
What is your primary role in this pharmacy?
- Pharmacist
- Pharmacy Technician
- Pharmacy Manager/Owner
- Intern/Student
- Other
How long have you worked in a pharmacy setting?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-9 years
- 10-19 years
- 20+ years
- Prefer not to say
What is your employment status at this pharmacy?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- PRN/On-call
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your candor. Responses across the team are combined into an anonymous safety culture report used to guide staffing, training, and reporting-process improvements — no individual answers are shared with management.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through their most recent medication error or near miss, surfacing the real contributing factors behind their ratings rather than stopping at a number.
- Combines AHRQ-aligned matrix questions on teamwork/communication and staffing/response-to-mistakes with a MaxDiff prioritization question, so managers see both attitudes and which fixes matter most.
- Captures concrete incident history (frequency of errors/near-misses, reporting behavior) alongside role, tenure, and employment status for meaningful subgroup comparison.
- Uses transparent prompts and automated per-response quality scoring, then rolls everything into an anonymized, auto-generated report for pharmacy leadership.
SurveyMonkey
Pharmacy Patient Safety Culture Survey Template | AHRQA directly comparable, AHRQ-referenced pharmacy safety culture template from a major survey platform. It's a fielding-ready static questionnaire covering similar culture dimensions, but it stops at collecting ratings rather than exploring the story behind them. Best suited for teams wanting a quick, standard rollout rather than deeper qualitative insight.
잘하는 점
- Explicitly AHRQ-referenced, matching the same recognized patient safety culture framework
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and reporting infrastructure
- Likely quick to deploy given SurveyMonkey's template library and simple editing tools
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe into specific near-miss incidents
- No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology
- No voice AI interview or guided task/screen-share option for richer incident reconstruction
SurveySparrow
Patient Safety Culture Survey TemplateA general healthcare patient safety culture template rather than one built specifically for pharmacy settings, so question wording likely needs adaptation for pharmacy workflows. It appears to be a standard conversational-style survey form, useful for broad culture pulse-checks but not tailored incident analysis.
잘하는 점
- Conversational survey format may improve completion rates over long grid-style forms
- Positioned within a broader healthcare template category, suggesting some domain familiarity
- Likely supports basic branching logic typical of SurveySparrow's platform
아쉬운 점
- Not pharmacy-specific, unlike a template modeled on pharmacy staffing/dispensing realities
- No adaptive AI interview to reconstruct a specific error or near-miss
- No stated automated quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure for respondent answers
QuestionPro
Employee Concern for Patients Survey TemplateThis template focuses on employee concern for patients broadly, which overlaps only partially with a pharmacy-specific patient safety culture assessment — it's not framed around AHRQ dimensions like staffing adequacy or response to mistakes. It reads as a fielding-ready static form aimed at general employee sentiment rather than incident-level safety culture analysis.
잘하는 점
- Simple, ready-to-use survey template within an established survey platform
- Framed around employee sentiment toward patients, which could suit general concern tracking
- Likely customizable within QuestionPro's standard survey builder
아쉬운 점
- Not aligned to the AHRQ patient safety culture framework or pharmacy-specific staffing/error dynamics
- No adaptive AI or voice interview to dig into a specific near-miss or error narrative
- No automated quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology disclosed
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Patient Registration Experience Survey
Measures how easy, clear, and efficient the patient registration and check-in process felt — from forms and insurance verification to staff interactions — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific friction point that slowed a patient down or made them repeat information. Built for clinics, hospitals, and practice managers evaluating intake workflows.
템플릿 보기Clinician Satisfaction With AI Documentation Tools
Measures how satisfied clinicians are with AI-assisted clinical documentation tools — accuracy, trust, time saved, and workflow fit — for health systems and vendors evaluating scribe or note-drafting technology. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a specific recent encounter where the tool helped or failed, surfacing concrete fixes that a satisfaction score alone can't show.
템플릿 보기Health Insurance Plan Satisfaction & Claims Experience Survey
Measures how members feel about their health insurance plan—value for cost, network access, claims experience, and renewal intent—for health plans, brokers, or HR benefits teams. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs what actually happened the last time a member tried to use their coverage, surfacing friction that closed-ended ratings miss.
템플릿 보기Student Wellbeing and Health Access Screening Survey
A confidential check-in for schools and campus health teams to spot patterns in student sleep, stress, nutrition, and access to care before they become crises. An AI follow-up interview explores the biggest wellbeing concern in the student's own words, surfacing what support would actually help rather than just a severity score.
템플릿 보기Employee Financial Wellness & Benefits Utilization Survey
Measures how financial stress shows up at work, how well employees understand and use existing financial benefits, and where new investment would land best. Built for HR and total-rewards teams, with an AI follow-up interview that uncovers why eligible employees skip benefits they say they value.
템플릿 보기Daycare Registration Experience Survey
Captures how smoothly parents moved through enrollment — from first inquiry through submitting health, immunization, and emergency paperwork — and what drove their choice of provider. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the exact moment registration got confusing or stalled, so admissions and health-compliance teams know what to fix first.
템플릿 보기