Research Informed Consent & Enrollment
A complete consent flow for research studies: plain-language study information, granular consent statements with a comprehension check, signature capture, and contact enrollment. Built for IRB-style requirements — participants confirm they understand, not just that they scrolled.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
STUDY INFORMATION — Purpose: [describe the study purpose in plain language]. What participation involves: [sessions, duration, recordings]. Risks and discomforts: [describe honestly]. Benefits and compensation: [amount and conditions]. Data handling: your data is stored securely, reported only in aggregate or pseudonymized form, and retained for [period]. Contact: [researcher name, institution, email]. This study has been approved by [IRB/ethics board reference].
Please review and confirm your consent to participate.
Recording consent (required for sessions that are recorded).
Quick comprehension check: what happens if you decide to stop participating halfway through the study?
- I can withdraw at any time, no reason needed
- I must complete the study once enrolled
- I can only withdraw with the sponsor's approval
Please type your full legal name.
Please sign below to record your consent.
Today's date:
Email address for study communications:
Thank you — your consent is recorded and a copy of this form will be sent to your email. Welcome to the study; you'll hear from the research team with next steps.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- A comprehension check verifies participants understood withdrawal rights — consent beyond scrolled-past text
- Granular consent statements separate participation from recording and quote usage, each individually confirmable
- Signature, date, and email receipt complete an IRB-style enrollment record in one flow
- Plain-language structure with clearly marked slots for study details, risks, and ethics-board references
Jotform
Research Informed Consent Form TemplatePurpose-built research consent form with participant/representative/parent-guardian/witness name fields, a consent & authorization block, e-signature widgets, up to three researcher signature blocks, and conditional logic. Strong on signature capture and roles, but it is a standalone form, not a consent gate that conditionally admits/blocks entry to the actual research instrument.
잘하는 점
- Dedicated signature capture for participants, representatives, guardians, witnesses, and up to three researchers
- E-signature widgets plus conditional logic to ensure required information is captured
- Role selection (participant vs. legal representative vs. guardian) built in
- Framed around collecting, managing, and protecting consent data for human-subjects research
아쉬운 점
- Consent lives as its own form; no native gating that routes non-consenting respondents away from the study and admits consenting ones into the same instrument
- No attention/comprehension check to confirm the participant actually understood key risk elements before signing
- No adaptive follow-up (e.g., clarifying questions when a participant hesitates on a specific authorization)
- No auto-generated participant-facing PDF receipt described beyond standard form submission
Qualtrics
Building a Consent Form (support guide)Official Qualtrics guide (not a one-click template) for building a research consent gate using skip logic for simple studies or Survey Flow branch logic for complex designs, plus an insertable downloadable file to review before consenting. Covers the consent-gating pattern well, but the core walkthrough is a yes/no consent question and does not cover digital signature capture.
잘하는 점
- Teaches the consent-gate pattern: skip logic (simple) or Survey Flow branch logic (complex) to end the survey for non-consenting respondents
- Supports inserting a downloadable consent document for review before responding
- Addresses GDPR/personal-data considerations in its FAQ
- Flexible enough for advanced multi-condition study designs
아쉬운 점
- Guide covers only a yes/no consent question; digital signature capture is not part of this walkthrough (it must be added separately)
- Requires manually wiring skip/branch logic; no packaged consent+signature question type
- No comprehension/attention check to verify understanding before consenting
- No adaptive follow-up or plain-language explainer surfaced to hesitant participants
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Vignette Experiment: Scenario & Framing Test
A true factorial vignette experiment: respondents judge realistic scenarios whose key details (price framing, messenger, wording) rotate systematically, so you can measure how each factor shifts judgment. The built-in vignette question type generates the scenario combinations for you.
템플릿 보기AI Literacy Self-Assessment for Undergraduates
A validated self-assessment instrument measuring undergraduate AI literacy across five dimensions: conceptual understanding, practical skills, critical evaluation, ethical reasoning, and awareness of limitations. Estimated completion time: 10-12 minutes.
템플릿 보기생성형 AI와 학생 학습 경험 설문조사
생성형 AI 도구가 학습 심화, 비판적 사고, 지식 유지, 메타인지 인식 전반에 걸쳐 학생의 학습 성과에 어떻게 영향을 미치는지 측정하는 연구 도구입니다. 사전/사후 및 실험 연구 설계를 위해 고안되었습니다. 예상 소요 시간: 10~14분.
템플릿 보기Instructor Readiness for AI Integration
This survey assesses instructor preparedness to integrate artificial intelligence into teaching, covering technology proficiency, AI literacy, pedagogical confidence, institutional support, professional development needs, and workload concerns. Estimated completion time: 10 minutes.
템플릿 보기AI Ethics Awareness Survey for Students
An academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
템플릿 보기Learner Needs Assessment: Curriculum & Support Priorities
Assesses how well current curriculum, resources, and support structures meet learner needs, identifying gaps and priorities to guide program improvements. Designed for enrolled students or active learners in formal or informal educational settings.
템플릿 보기