eConsent Clarity & Usability Assessment for Clinical Trials
Evaluates patient comprehension, usability, and decision confidence with electronic informed consent (eConsent) in clinical trials. Designed for post-consent administration to identify barriers and improve the consent experience.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
When did you most recently complete an electronic informed consent (eConsent) process for a clinical trial?
- Within the last month
- 1–3 months ago
- 4–6 months ago
- 7–12 months ago
- More than 12 months ago
- I have not completed an eConsent
Which device(s) did you use to review or complete the eConsent? Select all that apply.
- Smartphone
- Tablet
- Laptop
- Desktop computer
- Clinic-provided shared device
- Someone assisted by reading it to me
- Other
How clear was the eConsent in explaining the purpose and goals of the study?
Which of the following features, if any, did you use while reviewing the eConsent? Select all that apply.
- Search or glossary for terms
- Short informational videos
- Illustrations or diagrams
- Inline definitions next to terms
- Text-to-speech or screen reader
- Translation to another language
- Ability to enlarge text
- I did not use any of these features
Before making your participation decision, were your questions about the study adequately answered?
- I had no questions
- Yes, by study staff
- Yes, by the eConsent materials
- Partly
- No
Based on your experience, what would make the eConsent process clearer or easier? Please share any additional thoughts.
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65–74
- 75+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will be used to improve the eConsent experience for future clinical trial participants. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
Where did you complete most of the eConsent process?
- At the clinic with staff present
- At home or outside the clinic
- A mix of clinic and home
- Other
- Not sure
How clear was the eConsent in explaining the potential risks and side effects?
How would you rate the overall layout and readability of the eConsent?
How confident were you in your decision about participating after reviewing the eConsent?
We'd like to explore your eConsent experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how long did it take you to review and complete the eConsent, including reading?
- Less than 5 minutes
- 5–10 minutes
- 11–20 minutes
- 21–30 minutes
- 31–45 minutes
- More than 45 minutes
- I don't remember
How clear was the eConsent in explaining how your personal data will be used and protected?
If anything made the eConsent harder to understand, please rank the factors below from biggest barrier to smallest. Skip this question if none applied to you.
- Medical jargon or technical language
- Length of the document
- Small text or screen size
- Too many steps or screens
- Distractions or fatigue
- English is not my primary language
- Internet or device issues
In which region do you currently live?
- North America
- Europe
- Latin America
- Africa
- Middle East
- Asia
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the eConsent in explaining your right to withdraw from the study at any time?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the eConsent in explaining what procedures and visits are involved?
Is English your primary language?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
Overall, how easy was the eConsent to understand?
In the last 12 months, how often did you need help reading medical forms or documents?
- Never
- Rarely
- Sometimes
- Often
- Always
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Our template is purpose-built for post-consent evaluation of eConsent comprehension, not for capturing the consent signature itself — it measures clarity of purpose, risks, data use, withdrawal rights, and procedures via targeted opinion-scale items
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that adaptively probes respondents on their eConsent experience after the structured questions, something static form/survey builders cannot replicate
- Captures usability specifics (device used, location, time to complete, features used, layout/readability rating) plus a ranking question isolating what specifically made the eConsent hard to understand
- Collects health-literacy and demographic context (education, language, frequency needing help with medical forms) so comprehension gaps can be segmented by respondent characteristics, then rolls into an auto-generated report
Jotform
Clinical Trial Informed Consent Form TemplateThis is a fielding-ready form for capturing the informed consent signature/agreement itself, not a survey evaluating how well an eConsent was understood after the fact. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder with e-signature support. Useful for the consent step itself, but it doesn't assess comprehension, usability, or decision confidence.
잘하는 점
- Ready-to-use, customizable form fields and layout via Jotform's builder
- Supports e-signature collection for the consent process itself
- Easy to embed or share as part of a clinical trial workflow
아쉬운 점
- Designed to capture consent, not to evaluate comprehension or usability after the fact
- Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questioning to probe understanding gaps
- No mechanism for automated scoring of response quality or generating a comprehension/usability report
SurveySparrow
Patient Consent Form TemplateA general patient consent form template, not specific to clinical trials or eConsent usability assessment. It's positioned as a fielding-ready form for capturing patient consent, similar in purpose to Jotform's offering rather than a post-consent evaluation instrument. Its conversational survey format is a plus for engagement, but content is generic to patient consent rather than clinical-trial eConsent comprehension.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time format that can feel less intimidating than a static form
- General healthcare template library suggests easy customization for various consent scenarios
- Fielding-ready with minimal setup
아쉬운 점
- Not tailored to clinical trials or eConsent-specific comprehension/usability topics
- No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to explore individual patient confusion points
- No built-in per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey TemplateA generic System Usability Scale (SUS) instrument that could be adapted to measure usability of an eConsent platform, but it isn't tailored to clinical trials, informed consent content, or comprehension of risks/withdrawal rights/data use. It's a standardized, fielding-ready usability questionnaire rather than a domain-specific eConsent evaluation. Teams would need to build the consent-comprehension and demographic/health-literacy sections themselves.
잘하는 점
- Based on the well-established, validated SUS methodology for measuring perceived usability
- Fielding-ready and quick to deploy for general system usability measurement
- Standardized scoring approach familiar to UX researchers
아쉬운 점
- Generic usability focus only — no items on consent comprehension, risk/withdrawal clarity, or decision confidence specific to clinical trials
- No adaptive AI or voice AI follow-up to probe why usability scores were low for a given respondent
- No health-literacy or demographic segmentation built in, and no automated qualitative report generation
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
7-Day Patient Symptom & Wellbeing Assessment
A patient-reported outcome instrument tracking symptoms, treatment side effects, functional limitations, and quality of life over a 7-day recall period. Suitable for clinical research, treatment monitoring, and longitudinal patient wellbeing studies.
템플릿 보기Clinical Trial Site Workload & Data Capture Assessment
Measures documentation burden, system usability, and data capture pain points among clinical trial site staff. Designed for site coordinators, investigators, and research personnel to identify operational bottlenecks and prioritize workflow improvements.
템플릿 보기Post-Visit Patient Support & Education Experience Survey
Measures patient perceptions of post-visit support access, health education clarity, and care coordination quality. Designed for healthcare organizations seeking to identify gaps in patient communication and follow-up processes.
템플릿 보기LIS 사용성 및 데이터 무결성 평가
바이오테크 및 헬스케어 분야 실험실 전문가를 대상으로 최근 30~90일간의 경험을 바탕으로 실험실 정보 시스템의 사용성, 데이터 정확성, 워크플로 효율성을 평가합니다.
템플릿 보기Aging in Place: Community Needs Assessment for Adults 60+
Assesses daily living challenges, home safety, care coordination, and support priorities among community-dwelling older adults to inform program planning and resource allocation.
템플릿 보기치과 검진 및 구강 건강 확인 설문
검진 전후로 환자의 구강 위생 습관, 증상, 치과 방문 이력을 파악하며, 치과, 보험사, 공중보건 프로그램을 위한 자료입니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 보고된 통증이나 우려 사항을 심층적으로 파악하여 체크리스트만으로는 놓칠 수 있는 세부 정보를 드러내고, 임상의가 진료를 분류하고 우선순위를 정하는 데 도움을 줍니다.
템플릿 보기