User Trust & Consent Preferences for Privacy-Preserving Analytics
Measures users' comprehension of privacy-preserving analytics techniques, trust in identity protection, and preferences for consent controls and defaults. Designed for UX researchers and product teams evaluating analytics transparency features.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which of the following best describes aggregated website metrics?
- Combined across many users so individuals cannot be identified
- Includes your exact clicks tied to your identity
- Shares your personal details with partners
- I'm not sure
How confident are you that privacy-preserving metrics protect your identity?
Which of the following controls would you want for privacy-preserving analytics on websites? Select all that apply.
- On/off toggle for analytics
- Per-purpose controls (e.g., performance, personalization)
- Per-metric controls (e.g., time on page, clicks)
- Time-limited consent (auto-expires after a set period)
- Session-only consent (resets when I close the browser)
- View or download a record of metrics collected
Please read the following scenario carefully before answering the next two questions. Imagine a website collects only aggregated usage metrics using differential privacy to improve page performance. No raw data logs are stored. You can change your analytics choice at any time from a visible Privacy menu.
Thank you for your responses so far. We'd like to explore your privacy preferences in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions. Please respond in your own words.
Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about privacy-preserving analytics — including how they are explained, controlled, or implemented.
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for your time and insights! Your responses have been recorded and will be used to improve privacy-preserving analytics experiences. If you have any questions about this study, please contact the research team.
What does differential privacy aim to do?
- Add statistical noise so trends remain while individuals are protected
- Encrypt data end-to-end so only the company can read it
- Only remove names; everything else stays the same
- I'm not sure
Please rank the following control designs from most to least preferred.
- On/off toggle for analytics
- Per-purpose controls (e.g., performance, personalization)
- Per-metric controls (e.g., time on page, clicks)
- Time-limited consent (auto-expires)
- Session-only consent (resets on browser close)
- View or download a record of metrics collected
Based on the scenario described above, how comfortable would you be with this setup?
Which of the following best describes your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
What default setting should websites use for privacy-preserving analytics?
- Off by default (opt-in)
- On by default with clear notice and easy opt-out
- Ask me on first visit, then remember my choice
- No preference
How likely would you be to opt in to this type of analytics setup?
Where do you primarily live?
- North America
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Europe
- Middle East & North Africa
- Sub-Saharan Africa
- East Asia & Pacific
- South Asia
- Central Asia
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
If you opt in to privacy-preserving analytics, how long should your consent last before it expires?
- Single session only
- 30 days
- 90 days
- 1 year
- Until I change it
- I'm not sure
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- No formal education
- High school or equivalent
- Some college / associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate or professional degree
- Trade / technical / vocational training
- Prefer not to say
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.
차별화 포인트
- Goes beyond a single consent checkbox by testing actual comprehension of aggregated metrics and differential privacy before asking about trust or preferences.
- Uses a read-first scenario followed by comfort and opt-in-likelihood ratings, so you capture contextual attitudes rather than abstract opinions alone.
- Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into each respondent's stated privacy preferences based on their earlier answers, something static forms can't do.
- Combines ranking, multiple-choice, and dropdown questions on control designs, default settings, and consent duration with demographic breakdowns for segmented analysis, then closes with an auto-generated report.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Research Instrument Pilot Test Evaluation
Collects structured feedback from pilot participants on instrument clarity, cognitive burden, ambiguity sources, and session flow to guide pre-launch refinement of research questionnaires.
템플릿 보기Weekly App & Web Performance Pulse Survey
A recurring pulse survey for collecting structured user feedback on app or website speed, uptime, and error frequency over a 7-day window. Designed for product and engineering teams seeking to prioritize performance improvements and track reliability trends.
템플릿 보기Push Notification UX: Timing, Frequency & Control Preferences
Measures user satisfaction with push notification experiences across timing, frequency, perceived control, and content value. Designed for product and UX teams optimizing notification strategies for mobile or web applications.
템플릿 보기Neurodivergent Digital Accessibility & UX Barriers Assessment
Identifies specific design barriers, sensory preferences, and accessibility feature priorities for neurodivergent users. Designed for UX research teams seeking actionable insights to improve digital product inclusivity.
템플릿 보기기기 간 UX 평가: 제스처, 레이아웃 및 접근성
모바일, 태블릿, 데스크톱 기기 전반의 사용자 경험을 측정하며, 제스처 사용성, 레이아웃 탐색, 가독성, 접근성 기능 사용, 기기 간 일관성에 중점을 둡니다. 반응형 디자인 품질을 평가하는 UX 연구팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.
템플릿 보기Cross-Locale Format Interpretation & Preference Survey
Measures how users across world regions interpret and prefer date, time, number, and currency display formats, providing product and UX teams with actionable localization insights to reduce ambiguity and formatting errors.
템플릿 보기