Privacy & Compliance

Vendor Security and Risk Assessment Questionnaire

Assesses a vendor's security controls, certifications, data handling, and incident history for procurement, security, and compliance teams running third-party risk reviews. An AI follow-up interview digs into the vendor's single most significant unresolved risk instead of accepting a checklist of certifications at face value.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for completing this security assessment on behalf of your organization. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. It covers certifications, data handling, access controls, and incident history, and takes about 8 minutes. Please answer as accurately as possible — vague answers slow down the review.

Q02

객관식필수

Which of the following security certifications or attestations does your organization currently hold?

SOC 2 Type II
ISO 27001
PCI DSS
HIPAA compliance
FedRAMP
GDPR compliance program
None of the above

Q03

객관식필수

How is data belonging to your customers encrypted?

Encrypted at rest and in transit
Encrypted in transit only
Encrypted at rest only
Not encrypted
Not sure

Q04

매트릭스필수

For each control below, indicate its current implementation status at your organization.

5개 행 × 5개 열

Multi-factor authentication enforced for employee system access
Regular third-party penetration testing
Formal, tested incident response plan
Mandatory employee security awareness training
Documented data retention and deletion policy

열: Fully implemented · Partially implemented · Planned within 12 months · Not implemented · Not sure

Q05

객관식필수

In the last 24 months, has your organization experienced a security incident affecting customer data?

Yes — disclosed to affected customers
Yes — handled internally, no disclosure required
No incidents
Not sure / unable to disclose

Q06

객관식필수

Do you use subcontractors or subprocessors who would have access to our data?

Yes, and we maintain an up-to-date list we can share
Yes, but we don't proactively share a list
No subprocessors are used
Not sure

Q07

의견 척도필수

How confident are you that your current security program meets the requirements expected of vendors in regulated industries?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident

Q08

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these security investments is your organization prioritizing most over the next 12 months, and which least?

Zero trust network architecture
Third-party and vendor risk management tooling
Data loss prevention
Security awareness training
Incident response automation
Cloud security posture management
Encryption key management

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest priority최악:Lowest priority

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Identify the single most significant unresolved security or compliance risk this vendor is carrying right now — not the strongest area, the weakest one. If they reported an incident, get specifics on what happened, what changed afterward, and whether the fix was verified or just promised. If they claimed 'not sure' or 'not implemented' on any control, probe why and what would need to happen for it to close. Push past reassurance ('we take security seriously') to concrete evidence.

Q10

장문형

Are there any planned improvements to your security program in the next 12 months we should know about (e.g., new certifications, tooling, staffing)?

Q11

객관식

What is your role in relation to this vendor's security or compliance program?

Security / InfoSec lead
Compliance or legal
Engineering or IT leadership
Executive / founder
Sales or account management
Other
Prefer not to say

Q12

객관식

How many employees does your organization have?

1-50
51-250
251-1,000
1,001-5,000
More than 5,000
Prefer not to say

Q13

메시지

Thank you for completing this assessment. Your responses will be reviewed by our security and procurement team as part of our vendor risk evaluation, and we may follow up with clarifying questions before finalizing our decision.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Instead of taking a vendor's checklist of certifications at face value, an AI follow-up interview probes the single most significant unresolved security or compliance risk in depth.
Combines structured data collection (certifications, encryption practices, a control-implementation matrix, incident history, subprocessor disclosure) with a MaxDiff on investment priorities and a confidence rating, giving procurement and security teams both breadth and depth.
Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean reviewers get a synthesized risk summary instead of a raw spreadsheet of answers to manually triage.
Transparent prompts let security and compliance teams see and audit exactly how the AI is probing vendors, supporting internal review and audit-trail requirements.

QuestionPro

Vendor Security and Assessment Sample Questionnaire Template

A directly comparable, ready-to-field vendor security questionnaire template covering certifications, controls, and data handling. It's a static question set aimed at the same procurement/security use case as ours, but relies entirely on pre-written questions with no mechanism to dig deeper on any single vendor response.

잘하는 점

Purpose-built for vendor security assessment, not a generic security form
Backed by QuestionPro's established survey logic and reporting tools
Likely customizable within their broader survey platform

아쉬운 점

No adaptive follow-up questioning — every vendor answers the same fixed checklist regardless of risk level
No indication of automated per-response risk scoring or a synthesized risk report
No published methodology for how or why any given question was included

SurveySparrow

Vendor Security Assessment Questionnaire Template

A fielding-ready vendor security assessment template aimed at the same audience as ours. It uses SurveySparrow's conversational chat-style survey format, which improves completion experience but is still a fixed question flow rather than a genuine investigative interview.

잘하는 점

Conversational, chat-like UI that may improve vendor response rates
Directly targeted at vendor security/risk assessment use case
Likely mobile-friendly given SurveySparrow's product focus

아쉬운 점

Conversational styling is not the same as adaptive AI reasoning — questions and branching are pre-set, not generated from the vendor's actual answers
No mention of automated risk scoring or an auto-generated compliance report
No voice-based interview option for vendors who prefer speaking to typing

Jotform

Cyber Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire Form Template

A general cyber security risk assessment form rather than a template specifically framed around evaluating a third-party vendor for procurement purposes; it's still close enough in subject matter to be a relevant comparison. It's a static form-builder template that vendors or organizations fill out once, with no interview-style follow-up.

잘하는 점

Easy to build and deploy quickly using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
Broad applicability across general cyber security risk scenarios
Can integrate with Jotform's wider forms/e-signature ecosystem

아쉬운 점

Framed as general cyber security risk assessment, not vendor-specific procurement review — teams would need to adapt it themselves
Purely a static form: no adaptive AI probing of unresolved risks and no automated scoring of response quality
No structured mechanism (like a control-implementation matrix or investment prioritization ranking) built specifically for vendor risk comparison

자주 묻는 질문