QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿
Industry-Specific

Supplier Service Performance Evaluation Survey

Gathers structured performance ratings and behavioral feedback on a supplier's delivery, quality, and responsiveness, for procurement and vendor management teams conducting periodic reviews. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific incident behind the lowest-rated area so scorecards reflect what actually happened, not just a number.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to evaluate this supplier's performance. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest feedback shapes how we manage the relationship going forward — this should take about 8 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

How long has your team worked with this supplier?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1 to 3 years
  • More than 3 years
Q03
매트릭스필수

Rate the supplier's performance on each of the following in the last 6 months.

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • On-time delivery
  • Product/service quality
  • Communication responsiveness
  • Pricing and value
  • Problem resolution
  • 외 1개
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with this supplier?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q05
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this supplier to another team or business unit in your organization?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
객관식필수

In the last 6 months, how often did this supplier deliver on the agreed date?

  • Almost always on time
  • Occasionally late
  • Frequently late
  • Consistently late
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

When you think about what matters most in a supplier relationship, which of these do you value most and least?

  • Competitive pricing
  • Product/service quality
  • Delivery reliability
  • Clear communication
  • Responsive technical support
  • Contract/order flexibility
  • Willingness to innovate with us
  • Sustainability practices
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
평점 척도필수

How easy is it to get an issue or complaint resolved with this supplier?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q09
장문형

What is the single biggest pain point in working with this supplier right now?

Q10
AI 인터뷰

Identify the respondent's single lowest-rated area from the performance ratings or their stated pain point, and reconstruct one specific recent incident behind it: what happened, how it was handled, and what impact it had on their work. If they described a late delivery or unresolved issue, probe whether it was a one-off or a pattern, and what the supplier would need to do differently to prevent a recurrence.

Q11
객관식필수

How likely are you to continue or renew the contract with this supplier when it comes up for review?

  • Definitely will renew
  • Probably will renew
  • Undecided
  • Probably will switch
  • Definitely will switch
Q12
객관식

Which best describes your role in managing this supplier relationship?

  • Procurement/purchasing
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • Technical/engineering
  • Executive/management
Q13
객관식

What is the approximate annual spend your organization has with this supplier?

  • Under $50,000
  • $50,000 to $250,000
  • $250,000 to $1 million
  • Over $1 million
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the detailed feedback. Your responses feed directly into this supplier's performance scorecard and upcoming contract review.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix rating of delivery, quality, and responsiveness plus overall satisfaction and renewal-likelihood scales, giving a full quantitative scorecard in one flow
  • Pairs a max-diff question on what matters most in supplier relationships with an open-ended pain-point question, capturing priorities alongside raw complaints
  • An AI follow-up interview automatically targets whichever area the respondent rated lowest, asking about the specific incident behind the score instead of leaving it as an unexplained number
  • Segments responses by role and annual spend, so procurement teams can slice results by relationship owner and account size, then hands off into an auto-generated report

QuestionPro

Supplier Service Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a directly comparable static supplier service evaluation template covering similar rating dimensions like delivery and quality. It reads as a sample questionnaire page with reference questions rather than a fully interactive fielding tool shown in-page. Good for teams that just need a standard question list to copy into their own survey.

잘하는 점

  • Directly on-topic for supplier service evaluation
  • Provides a ready sample question set covering common performance dimensions
  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad distribution features

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning to explore the reasoning behind a low rating
  • No mention of voice-based interviewing or guided screen-share tasks
  • No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

Jotform

Janitorial Services Performance Evaluation Form Template

This is a fielding-ready form, but it's built specifically for evaluating janitorial service providers rather than suppliers generally, so it's a narrower niche than a general procurement/vendor review template. It likely covers cleanliness and service-quality style ratings rather than delivery/contract-spend style supplier metrics. Useful mainly if your target category is literally janitorial services.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built and ready to deploy for a specific service category
  • Simple form-builder format that's easy to customize
  • Backed by Jotform's broader form and workflow ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up on flagged low scores
  • Narrow focus on janitorial services rather than general supplier/vendor management
  • No automated incident-level probing or auto-generated vendor performance report

SurveySparrow

Supplier Quality Evaluation Form Template | Questionnaire to Assess Suppliers & Vendors

This is a relevant, ready-to-use supplier/vendor quality evaluation form covering assessment criteria similar to our scorecard approach. It appears focused on quality assessment specifically, which may be narrower than the delivery, responsiveness, and renewal-intent coverage in our template. It's a conversational-style form product, but nothing on the page indicates adaptive follow-up interviewing.

잘하는 점

  • On-topic for supplier/vendor quality assessment
  • Conversational form format that may improve completion rates
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting and distribution tools

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into the specific incident behind a low score
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No disclosed per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기

관련 템플릿

같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.

전체 보기
Industry-Specific

Primary Trauma Exposure & Workplace Support Survey

For organizations in high-risk professions (first responders, healthcare, social services, journalism) to understand how often staff are directly exposed to traumatic events on the job and whether current support systems actually help. An AI follow-up interview explores what support was present or missing after a recent difficult incident, without asking anyone to relive graphic details.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Donor Experience & Fundraising Feedback Survey

Captures how donors experienced your giving process, what motivates their generosity, and how they'd allocate funds across programs. Built for development and fundraising teams, with an AI follow-up that digs into the real story behind a donor's satisfaction or likelihood to give again.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Forced-Choice Agreement Survey (No Neutral Option)

Measures agreement with a set of statements using an even-numbered rating scale that removes the neutral midpoint, forcing respondents to lean agree or disagree rather than sit on the fence. Built for HR, product, and policy teams who want to reduce central-tendency bias in attitude research. The AI follow-up digs into the concrete reason behind each respondent's strongest lean and what would change their mind.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Shopper Lifestyle & Motivation Battery Survey

A psychographic battery that segments respondents by how they think and feel about shopping — browsing for fun vs. necessity, planning vs. impulse, price-driven vs. brand-loyal — paired with an AI follow-up that unpacks the story behind their most recent unplanned purchase. Built for retail, e-commerce, and CPG teams building shopper segments.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

Job Application Experience Feedback Survey

Captures how candidates experience your job application process — from finding the posting to hitting submit — covering clarity, length, and communication. Built for recruiting and HR teams, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the exact moment an applicant almost gave up or felt confused, rather than just averaging satisfaction scores.

템플릿 보기
Industry-Specific

영화 대여 경험 및 가격 설문조사

사람들이 키오스크부터 주문형 스트리밍 대여까지 영화를 어떻게 선택하고, 결제하고, 어떻게 느끼는지를 카탈로그 만족도, 가격 기준, 기능 우선순위를 아우르며 살펴봅니다. AI 후속 인터뷰는 응답자의 가장 최근 대여 결정 뒤에 숨은 구체적인 사연을 파고들어, 단순히 진술된 선호가 아닌 실제 불편 지점을 드러냅니다. 스트리밍 플랫폼, 키오스크 운영사, 주문형 비디오 팀을 위해 설계되었습니다.

템플릿 보기