VR Motion Sickness & Comfort Technique Assessment
Measures VR players' motion sickness susceptibility, symptom frequency, discomfort triggers, and comfort technique preferences to guide UX design decisions for virtual reality games and experiences.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, how often did you use VR?
- Daily
- 4–6 days per week
- 1–3 days per week
- Less than once per week
- Not in the last 30 days
Overall, how susceptible to motion sickness are you when using VR?
Which comfort techniques do you usually enable when playing VR? Select all that apply.
- Vignette/comfort blinders
- Teleport or point-to-move
- Snap turning (e.g., 30°/45°)
- Lower movement speed/acceleration
- Seated play
- Fixed horizon/reticle
- Scheduled rest breaks
- Ginger/anti-nausea aids
- None — I don't use comfort techniques
- Other
What most limits your use of comfort features today? Select all that apply.
- Concern that comfort features reduce immersion or gameplay
- Setup friction or confusing menus
- I don't know which settings to use
- Games I play lack good comfort options
- Motion style mismatches the genre
- Hardware performance or frame drops
- Other
Which specific VR titles, scenes, or moments have caused you the most discomfort recently? Please describe briefly.
What is your age range?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your responses will help inform the design of more comfortable VR experiences. All data will be reported in aggregate. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the research team.
Which VR headset(s) do you currently use? Select all that apply.
- Meta Quest 2
- Meta Quest 3
- Meta Quest Pro
- PS VR2
- HTC Vive
- Valve Index
- Pico (any)
- Windows MR (any)
- Other
In the last 30 days, how frequently did you experience nausea while using VR?
How effective do you find vignette/comfort blinders for reducing discomfort?
Rank the following from what would help you most to least with VR comfort.
- More in-game comfort options
- Clearer comfort tutorials and onboarding
- Higher frame rate and performance
- Personal adaptation or training modes
- Community guides and best practices
Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important thing VR developers could do to improve your comfort experience?
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer not to say
- Self-describe
Which VR game genres do you play most often? Select all that apply.
- First-person shooter
- Racing
- Flight/space sim
- Horror
- Puzzle
- Rhythm/music
- Exploration/walking sim
- Sports/fitness
- Social/party
- Simulation/management
- Other
In the last 30 days, how frequently did you experience dizziness or disorientation while using VR?
How effective do you find teleport or point-to-move locomotion for reducing discomfort?
In which region do you currently live?
- North America
- Europe
- Latin America
- Asia
- Middle East
- Africa
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How do you usually play VR?
- Mostly seated
- Mix of seated and standing/room-scale
- Mostly standing/room-scale
In the last 30 days, how frequently did you experience eye strain or headache while using VR?
How effective do you find snap turning for reducing discomfort?
How long have you been playing video games regularly?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–3 years
- 4–7 years
- 8–15 years
- 16–25 years
- More than 25 years
In the last 30 days, how frequently did you experience sweating or general physical discomfort while using VR?
How effective do you find lower movement speed or acceleration for reducing discomfort?
How long have you been using VR overall?
- Under 3 months
- 3–6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–3 years
- 3+ years
Rank the following from most to least likely to trigger discomfort for you.
- Smooth locomotion (thumbstick walking)
- Vehicle acceleration or deceleration
- Strafing or lateral movement
- Vertical movement (elevators, flying up/down)
- Camera shake or head-bob
- Rapid turning (snap or smooth)
How willing are you to try experimental comfort settings in new VR games?
After roughly how many minutes of smooth locomotion does discomfort typically begin?
- I don't experience discomfort from smooth locomotion
- Less than 5 minutes
- 5–15 minutes
- 16–30 minutes
- 31–60 minutes
- More than 60 minutes
How do you handle IPD (inter-pupillary distance / lens spacing) on your headset?
- Adjust every session
- Set once, rarely change
- Auto-IPD on my device
- My device lacks hardware IPD adjustment
- Not sure what IPD is
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.
관련 템플릿
같은 카테고리의 다른 설문을 만나 보세요.
Developer Synthetic Data Adoption & Ethics Survey
Measures developer experience, tooling preferences, risk perceptions, and adoption intent for synthetic data. Designed for engineering and data science teams evaluating synthetic data readiness and ethical boundaries.
템플릿 보기Workplace AI Adoption & Compliance Assessment
Measures employee AI tool usage patterns, shadow AI risks, policy awareness, and training needs to inform governance and safe-adoption strategies across the organization.
템플릿 보기AI Refusal Message Clarity & Tone Evaluation
A stimulus-comparison survey for UX researchers and AI product teams to evaluate the clarity, tone, and helpfulness of AI safety and refusal messages. Produces actionable data on user preferences and improvement priorities.
템플릿 보기Evaluation Fairness & Representation Perceptions Survey for Developers
Measures software developers' perceptions of fairness, bias, and representativeness in their evaluation practices. Ideal for engineering leadership and DEI teams seeking to identify gaps in evaluation methodology and build more inclusive processes.
템플릿 보기생성형 AI 신뢰, 안전성 및 가드레일 선호도 설문조사
생성형 AI 도구에 대한 소비자 신뢰, 인지된 안전성 위험, 투명성 기대치, 가드레일 선호도를 측정하여 책임 있는 AI 제품 설계 및 정책 수립에 활용합니다.
템플릿 보기AI Content Watermark Perception & Trust Survey
Measures consumer awareness, trust, acceptability, and behavioral intentions regarding AI content provenance watermarks, designed for technology policy researchers and platform designers evaluating labeling strategies.
템플릿 보기