All templates
Research

AI Moderator Effectiveness by Demographic Group

A post-experience research survey evaluating the effectiveness of AI interview moderators across demographic groups. Measures overall experience quality, perceived empathy and understanding, cultural sensitivity, accessibility, and direct comparisons with human moderators. Designed to detect demographic moderation effects.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

31 questions · ~13 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to this research study on interview experiences. You recently participated in a research interview moderated by an AI system. We would now like to understand your experience. This survey takes approximately 10-12 minutes. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested only in your honest opinions and perceptions. Your responses are completely confidential, will be anonymized, and reported only in aggregate for academic research purposes. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time without penalty. Please click 'Next' to begin.

Q02
Multiple Choice

Have you completed a research interview moderated by an AI system within the past 7 days?

  • Yes
  • No
  • I'm not sure
Q03
Multiple Choice

How often do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., chatbots, voice assistants, AI writing tools) in your daily life?

  • Never
  • Rarely (a few times a year)
  • Sometimes (a few times a month)
  • Often (a few times a week)
  • Daily or almost daily
Q04
Message

The next questions ask about the AI-moderated research interview you recently completed. Please think specifically about that experience as you respond.

Q05
Opinion Scale

To what extent did you feel the AI moderator understood what you were trying to communicate?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at allMax:Completely
Q06
Opinion Scale

To what extent did the AI moderator's questions feel respectful of your cultural background and personal identity?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all respectfulMax:Extremely respectful
Q07
Multiple Choice

Did you experience any of the following barriers during the AI-moderated interview? Select all that apply.

  • Difficulty reading or understanding the AI's questions
  • The AI responded too quickly for me to keep up
  • The AI did not understand my writing style or phrasing
  • Technical issues (lag, errors, or crashes)
  • The interface was difficult to navigate
  • The interview felt too long or exhausting
  • Language or vocabulary was too complex
  • I needed accommodations that were not available
  • None — I did not experience any barriers
  • Other (please specify)
Q08
Multiple Choice

Have you ever participated in a research interview conducted by a human moderator (in person, by phone, or by video)?

  • Yes
  • No
Q09
AI Interview

Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience with the AI moderator — including anything we may not have asked about.

Q10
Dropdown

What is your age?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65-74
  • 75 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Opinion Scale

How comfortable are you interacting with AI-powered systems in general?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all comfortableMax:Extremely comfortable
Q12
Opinion Scale

How would you rate your overall experience with the AI-moderated interview?

Scale: 17
Min:Extremely negativeMax:Extremely positive
Q13
Opinion Scale

To what extent did the AI moderator respond with empathy to your answers?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at allMax:Completely
Q14
AI Interview

Were there any moments during the AI-moderated interview where you felt misunderstood, stereotyped, or that the AI was insensitive to your perspective? Please share what happened and how it affected your experience.

Q15
Opinion Scale

How easy was the AI-moderated interview to navigate and complete?

Scale: 17
Min:Extremely difficultMax:Extremely easy
Q16
Opinion Scale

Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on overall interview quality?

Scale: 17
Min:AI was much worseMax:AI was much better
Q17
Multiple Choice

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Self-describe (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
Multiple Choice

Before this study, how many times had you interacted with an AI-powered chatbot or interview system?

  • Never — this was my first time
  • 1-2 times
  • 3-5 times
  • 6-10 times
  • More than 10 times
Q19
Opinion Scale

How likely are you to participate in another research interview moderated by an AI in the future?

Scale: 17
Min:Extremely unlikelyMax:Extremely likely
Q20
Opinion Scale

How well did the AI moderator adapt its follow-up questions to your specific responses?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q21
Opinion Scale

Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on making you feel heard and understood?

Scale: 17
Min:AI was much worseMax:AI was much better
Q22
Multiple Choice

Which of the following best describes your racial or ethnic background? Select all that apply.

  • American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Asian
  • Black or African American
  • Hispanic or Latino/a/x
  • Middle Eastern or North African
  • Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
  • White
  • Self-describe (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
Opinion Scale

To what extent did you feel comfortable sharing your honest opinions during the AI-moderated interview?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all comfortableMax:Extremely comfortable
Q24
Opinion Scale

How natural did the conversation with the AI moderator feel?

Scale: 17
Min:Completely artificialMax:Completely natural
Q25
Opinion Scale

Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on creating a comfortable environment for sharing honest opinions?

Scale: 17
Min:AI was much worseMax:AI was much better
Q26
Dropdown

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school diploma or GED
  • Some college, no degree
  • Associate's degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctoral or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
Opinion Scale

How personally sensitive or emotionally charged did you find the topic of the interview you completed?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all sensitiveMax:Extremely sensitive
Q28
Opinion Scale

Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on being respectful of your cultural background and identity?

Scale: 17
Min:AI was much worseMax:AI was much better
Q29
Multiple Choice

What is the primary language you speak at home?

  • English
  • Spanish
  • Mandarin Chinese
  • Hindi
  • Arabic
  • French
  • Portuguese
  • Other (please specify)
  • Prefer not to say
Q30
Multiple Choice

Do you identify as having a disability that affects how you interact with digital technology? (Optional)

  • Yes — visual impairment
  • Yes — hearing impairment
  • Yes — motor/physical disability
  • Yes — cognitive or learning disability
  • Yes — other (please specify)
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q31
Multiple Choice

How would you describe the area where you live?

  • Urban (large city)
  • Suburban (outskirts of a city)
  • Small town
  • Rural
  • Prefer not to say

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Research

Reproducibility in AI-Moderated Research: A Researcher Assessment

This survey explores researcher experiences with reproducibility, transparency, and data quality in AI-moderated research. It serves as a replication study template to understand current practices, identify barriers, and assess the role of platform transparency in enabling reproducible AI-moderated studies.

View template
Research

AI Interview Data Quality Assessment

A meta-research coding instrument for researchers to systematically evaluate and compare data quality from AI-moderated interviews versus traditional qualitative methods. Designed for repeated use across multiple data sets. Estimated completion time: 12-15 minutes per data set evaluated.

View template
Research

Stakeholder Interview Eligibility Screener

Pre-qualifies potential stakeholder interviewees by assessing role fit, recent domain involvement, and scheduling availability for 45–60 minute research sessions.

View template
Research

E-Commerce Buyer Persona & Channel Preference Survey

Segments online shoppers by purchase behavior, experience drivers, and communication channel preferences. Use this to build data-driven buyer personas and optimize channel strategy for e-commerce brands.

View template
Research

Experimentation Maturity & Data Trust Assessment

Measures A/B testing ease-of-use, guardrail adoption, result trust, and decision confidence among product and engineering teams. Use it to identify friction points, governance gaps, and training needs to scale experimentation.

View template
Research

Academic Researcher Experience & Support Survey

Measures how graduate students, postdocs, and faculty actually spend their research time, and how well funding, mentorship, protected time, and collaboration support their work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each respondent names, reconstructing a concrete recent example instead of a vague complaint. Built for research offices, deans, and PIs benchmarking research support.

View template