AI Moderator Effectiveness by Demographic Group
A post-experience research survey evaluating the effectiveness of AI interview moderators across demographic groups. Measures overall experience quality, perceived empathy and understanding, cultural sensitivity, accessibility, and direct comparisons with human moderators. Designed to detect demographic moderation effects.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
Have you completed a research interview moderated by an AI system within the past 7 days?
- Yes
- No
- I'm not sure
How often do you use AI-powered tools (e.g., chatbots, voice assistants, AI writing tools) in your daily life?
- Never
- Rarely (a few times a year)
- Sometimes (a few times a month)
- Often (a few times a week)
- Daily or almost daily
The next questions ask about the AI-moderated research interview you recently completed. Please think specifically about that experience as you respond.
To what extent did you feel the AI moderator understood what you were trying to communicate?
To what extent did the AI moderator's questions feel respectful of your cultural background and personal identity?
Did you experience any of the following barriers during the AI-moderated interview? Select all that apply.
- Difficulty reading or understanding the AI's questions
- The AI responded too quickly for me to keep up
- The AI did not understand my writing style or phrasing
- Technical issues (lag, errors, or crashes)
- The interface was difficult to navigate
- The interview felt too long or exhausting
- Language or vocabulary was too complex
- I needed accommodations that were not available
- None — I did not experience any barriers
- Other (please specify)
Have you ever participated in a research interview conducted by a human moderator (in person, by phone, or by video)?
- Yes
- No
Based on your responses throughout this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about your experience with the AI moderator — including anything we may not have asked about.
What is your age?
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65-74
- 75 or older
- Prefer not to say
How comfortable are you interacting with AI-powered systems in general?
How would you rate your overall experience with the AI-moderated interview?
To what extent did the AI moderator respond with empathy to your answers?
Were there any moments during the AI-moderated interview where you felt misunderstood, stereotyped, or that the AI was insensitive to your perspective? Please share what happened and how it affected your experience.
How easy was the AI-moderated interview to navigate and complete?
Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on overall interview quality?
What is your gender identity?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Before this study, how many times had you interacted with an AI-powered chatbot or interview system?
- Never — this was my first time
- 1-2 times
- 3-5 times
- 6-10 times
- More than 10 times
How likely are you to participate in another research interview moderated by an AI in the future?
How well did the AI moderator adapt its follow-up questions to your specific responses?
Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on making you feel heard and understood?
Which of the following best describes your racial or ethnic background? Select all that apply.
- American Indian or Alaska Native
- Asian
- Black or African American
- Hispanic or Latino/a/x
- Middle Eastern or North African
- Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
- White
- Self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
To what extent did you feel comfortable sharing your honest opinions during the AI-moderated interview?
How natural did the conversation with the AI moderator feel?
Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on creating a comfortable environment for sharing honest opinions?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school diploma or GED
- Some college, no degree
- Associate's degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctoral or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
How personally sensitive or emotionally charged did you find the topic of the interview you completed?
Compared to a human moderator, how would you rate the AI moderator on being respectful of your cultural background and identity?
What is the primary language you speak at home?
- English
- Spanish
- Mandarin Chinese
- Hindi
- Arabic
- French
- Portuguese
- Other (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
Do you identify as having a disability that affects how you interact with digital technology? (Optional)
- Yes — visual impairment
- Yes — hearing impairment
- Yes — motor/physical disability
- Yes — cognitive or learning disability
- Yes — other (please specify)
- No
- Prefer not to say
How would you describe the area where you live?
- Urban (large city)
- Suburban (outskirts of a city)
- Small town
- Rural
- Prefer not to say
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies from the same category.
Reproducibility in AI-Moderated Research: A Researcher Assessment
This survey explores researcher experiences with reproducibility, transparency, and data quality in AI-moderated research. It serves as a replication study template to understand current practices, identify barriers, and assess the role of platform transparency in enabling reproducible AI-moderated studies.
View templateAI Interview Data Quality Assessment
A meta-research coding instrument for researchers to systematically evaluate and compare data quality from AI-moderated interviews versus traditional qualitative methods. Designed for repeated use across multiple data sets. Estimated completion time: 12-15 minutes per data set evaluated.
View templateStakeholder Interview Eligibility Screener
Pre-qualifies potential stakeholder interviewees by assessing role fit, recent domain involvement, and scheduling availability for 45–60 minute research sessions.
View templateE-Commerce Buyer Persona & Channel Preference Survey
Segments online shoppers by purchase behavior, experience drivers, and communication channel preferences. Use this to build data-driven buyer personas and optimize channel strategy for e-commerce brands.
View templateExperimentation Maturity & Data Trust Assessment
Measures A/B testing ease-of-use, guardrail adoption, result trust, and decision confidence among product and engineering teams. Use it to identify friction points, governance gaps, and training needs to scale experimentation.
View templateAcademic Researcher Experience & Support Survey
Measures how graduate students, postdocs, and faculty actually spend their research time, and how well funding, mentorship, protected time, and collaboration support their work. An AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest obstacle each respondent names, reconstructing a concrete recent example instead of a vague complaint. Built for research offices, deans, and PIs benchmarking research support.
View template