Q01
Multiple Choice
Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university?
- Yes
- No
All templatesEducation & Academic
Academic Integrity in the Age of AI
A research survey examining how AI tools are reshaping academic integrity norms among college and university students. Covers policy awareness, personal usage patterns, acceptability perceptions, peer behavior observations, and policy recommendations.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
32 questions · ~13 min
Q02
Message
Welcome to this study on student experiences with AI tools in academic settings. This survey is conducted for research purposes only. Your responses are completely anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual can be identified. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time without consequence. The survey takes approximately 10-12 minutes to complete. By continuing, you consent to participate in this study.
Q03
Dropdown
What is your current academic level?
- First-year undergraduate
- Second-year undergraduate
- Third-year undergraduate
- Fourth-year (or more) undergraduate
- Master's student
- Doctoral / PhD student
- Professional degree student (e.g., JD, MD, MBA)
- Other
Q04
Multiple Choice
To your knowledge, does your college or university have a formal policy on the use of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot) in academic work?
- Yes, there is a formal policy
- There may be informal guidelines, but no formal policy
- No, there is no policy
- I'm not sure
Q05
Message
The next few questions ask about your own experiences using AI tools for academic work. Remember, your responses are completely anonymous — we are interested in understanding real student practices, not making judgments.
Q06
Message
Students use AI in many different ways, and opinions vary widely on what is acceptable. The following scenarios describe different ways a student might use AI tools. For each one, please rate how acceptable you believe it is. Note: These scenarios may appear in a randomized order.
Q07
AI Interview
Thinking about the scenarios you just rated, can you describe a specific situation where you felt unsure whether using an AI tool was acceptable or not? What made it feel like a gray area?
Q08
Message
The next questions ask about what you have observed among other students at your institution. These are not about your own behavior — just your general impressions.
Q09
Message
Finally, we would like your input on how institutions should approach AI tools in academic settings.
Q10
Long Text
Based on your responses throughout this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about AI tools and academic integrity — including experiences, concerns, or suggestions we may not have asked about?
Q11
Dropdown
What is your primary field of study?
- Arts & Humanities
- Social Sciences
- Business & Economics
- Natural Sciences
- Engineering
- Computer Science & Information Technology
- Health Sciences & Medicine
- Education
- Law
- Mathematics & Statistics
- Other (please specify)
Q12
Multiple Choice
Which of the following AI tools have you used at least once, for any purpose — academic or personal? (Select all that apply)
- ChatGPT (OpenAI)
- Microsoft Copilot / Bing Chat
- Google Gemini (formerly Bard)
- Claude (Anthropic)
- Grammarly AI features
- AI-powered paraphrasing tools (e.g., QuillBot)
- GitHub Copilot or other AI coding assistants
- AI image generators (e.g., DALL-E, Midjourney)
- Other AI tool not listed
- I have not used any AI tools
Q13
Opinion Scale
How well do you feel you understand the rules or guidelines at your institution regarding AI use in academic work?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all wellMax:Extremely well
Q14
Multiple Choice
During the current academic term, how often have you used AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Grammarly AI, AI paraphrasing tools) to assist with any academic work?
- Never
- Once or twice
- A few times a month
- A few times a week
- Daily or almost daily
Q15
Opinion Scale
Using an AI tool to brainstorm or generate ideas for an essay topic
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
Q16
Opinion Scale
In your estimation, how common is it for students at your institution to use AI tools for academic work?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all commonMax:Extremely common
Q17
Multiple Choice
Which of the following best describes the approach you think colleges and universities should take regarding AI tools in academic work?
- Ban AI tool use entirely in academic work
- Allow AI only for specific low-stakes tasks (e.g., brainstorming, grammar checking)
- Allow AI use broadly but require students to disclose it
- Allow AI use broadly with no disclosure requirement
- Let individual instructors decide for their own courses
- Other (please specify)
Q18
Dropdown
What is your age?
- 18-20
- 21-23
- 24-26
- 27-30
- 31-35
- 36-40
- 41 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q19
Opinion Scale
Across your courses this term, how consistent have your instructors been in communicating their expectations about AI tool use?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Very inconsistentMax:Very consistent
Q20
Multiple Choice
For which of the following academic tasks have you used AI tools? (Select all that apply)
- Brainstorming or generating ideas
- Researching or finding sources
- Summarizing readings or articles
- Writing or drafting text
- Editing, grammar, or proofreading
- Solving math or science problems
- Writing or debugging code
- Creating presentations or visual materials
- Studying or preparing for exams
- Translating text between languages
- Other (please specify)
- I have not used AI tools for academic tasks
Q21
Opinion Scale
Using an AI tool to check grammar and improve sentence structure in a paper you wrote yourself
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
Q22
Opinion Scale
In your estimation, how common is it for students at your institution to submit AI-generated work without disclosing the use of AI to their instructor?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all commonMax:Extremely common
Q23
Opinion Scale
How important do you think it is for an AI academic integrity policy to include clear definitions of what AI use is and is not permitted?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all importantMax:Extremely important
Q24
Multiple Choice
Which best describes the institution where you are currently enrolled?
- Public university
- Private university
- Community college
- Liberal arts college
- Online-only institution
- Other (please specify)
Q25
Opinion Scale
When you use AI tools for academic work, how often do you mention or disclose this use to your instructor?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:NeverMax:Always
Q26
Opinion Scale
Using an AI tool to summarize assigned readings instead of reading them in full
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
Q27
Opinion Scale
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Most students at my institution do not consider using AI tools for academic work to be a form of cheating.
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Strongly disagreeMax:Strongly agree
Q28
Opinion Scale
How important is it to you that students are involved in developing their institution's AI use policies?
Scale: 1 – 5
Min:Not at all importantMax:Extremely important
Q29
Opinion Scale
Using an AI tool to generate a first draft of a written assignment that you then edit and submit
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
Q30
Opinion Scale
Using an AI tool to generate code for a programming assignment
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
Q31
Opinion Scale
Using an AI tool to produce answers for a take-home exam or graded quiz
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
Q32
Opinion Scale
Submitting AI-generated text as entirely your own work without any editing or disclosure
Scale: 1 – 7
Min:Completely unacceptableMax:Completely acceptable
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
How it compares
We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.
Why this template
- Includes an AI follow-up interview question that lets students describe a specific real scenario in their own words, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
- Pairs opinion-scale acceptability ratings across 7 distinct AI-use scenarios (brainstorming, grammar checking, summarizing, drafting, coding, exam answers, submitting AI text as one's own) so nuance in norms isn't lost
- Combines policy-awareness, personal-usage, peer-observation, and policy-recommendation sections with transitional chat messages that frame each part of the study for respondents
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean open-ended disclosure and recommendation questions can be analyzed without manual coding
Jotform
Academic Integrity Form TemplateThis is a static, fielding-ready form template rather than a research instrument, likely oriented toward reporting or acknowledging integrity policies rather than studying attitudes and usage patterns. It's easy to deploy and customize with Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, but it isn't designed to probe nuanced student perceptions or behaviors. No mention of adaptive questioning or AI-assisted follow-up.
What it does well
- Quick to deploy using Jotform's established form builder
- Likely offers simple customization of fields and branding
- Familiar, widely-used form platform for institutions
Where it falls short
- Static question set with no adaptive follow-up probing on individual responses
- No voice AI interview option for richer qualitative capture
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
Typeform
Academic Research Form TemplateA generic academic research form template rather than one purpose-built around AI and academic integrity themes, so a researcher would need to substantially rewrite questions to cover policy awareness, usage, and peer-behavior topics. Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format is pleasant for respondents, but the template itself is a generic starting point, not a subject-matter-specific instrument. No adaptive AI interviewing is indicated.
What it does well
- Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI known for good completion rates
- Flexible logic branching for skip patterns
- Easy to customize question wording and answer types
Where it falls short
- Generic template requires manual rebuilding of academic-integrity-specific content (policy awareness, acceptability ladder, peer observation)
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview capability
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated report
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “Academic Integrity in the Age of AI” template?
The template includes 32 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Are you currently enrolled as a student at a college or university?” · “Welcome to this study on student experiences with AI tools in academic settings. This survey is conducted for research…” · “What is your current academic level?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 32 questions in about 13 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
Education & Academic
Faculty Perspectives on AI in Grading & Assessment
An academic research survey exploring faculty attitudes, concerns, and readiness regarding AI-assisted grading and assessment tools. Covers current practices, openness to adoption, concerns about bias/accuracy/privacy, training needs, and willingness to participate in controlled experiments.
View templateEducation & Academic
AI in Coursework: Student Integrity & Policy Attitudes
Measures student attitudes toward AI tool usage in academic settings, integrity concerns, and preferred institutional safeguards. Designed for higher-education administrators and faculty seeking data to inform responsible AI-use policies.
View templateEducation & Academic
Academic Integrity and Cheating Culture Survey
Measures how common cheating really is, which behaviors students consider acceptable, and what actually drives the decision to cut corners — for schools and departments auditing their academic integrity culture. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the reasoning behind a specific incident instead of settling for a guilt-laden yes/no.
View templateEducation & Academic
Academic Integrity Climate Survey for Students
Measures student awareness of academic integrity policies, perceived peer norms around misconduct, and views on institutional interventions. Designed for education administrators and researchers seeking actionable data to strengthen integrity culture.
View templateEducation & Academic
Student Attitudes Toward AI Writing Tools
An academic research survey examining how college and university students perceive and use AI writing tools such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and similar technologies. The survey covers usage patterns, perceived benefits and dependency concerns, academic integrity perspectives, quality comparisons, and instructor communication about AI policies.
View templateEducation & Academic
AI Ethics Awareness Survey for Students
An academic instrument measuring student awareness of, exposure to, and attitudes toward artificial intelligence ethics. Covers concept familiarity, training exposure, ethical dilemma responses, regulation views, and willingness to prioritize ethics over convenience. Estimated completion: 8–12 minutes.
View template