QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
Start free
All templates
Industry-Specific

Activity & Session Evaluation Survey

A flexible feedback survey for workshops, trainings, retreats, or team activities — covering attendance, facilitator quality, content relevance, and likelihood to recommend, plus an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind each recommendation score so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat.

Use this template

No sign-up to try · Unlimited responses on the free plan

Live preview
Activity & Session Evaluation Survey

Thanks for taking part in this activity! We'd love your honest feedback so we can make it better next time. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 7 minutes.

Powered by QuestionPunk

Default theme. Colors and fonts are yours to change.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

11 questions · ~7 min
Message

Thanks for taking part in this activity! We'd love your honest feedback so we can make it better next time. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 7 minutes.

Q01
Multiple ChoiceRequired

How much of the session did you take part in?

  • The entire session
  • Most of it
  • About half
  • Less than half
  • I did not attend
Q02
Opinion ScaleRequired

Overall, how would you rate this activity?

Scale: 1 – 10
Min:PoorMax:Excellent
Q03
Rating ScaleRequired

How would you rate the facilitator(s) or instructor(s) who led the session?

Range: 1 – 5
Min:Not effective at allMax:Extremely effective
Q04
MatrixRequired

How much do you agree with each of the following statements about the session?

5 rows × 5 columns
  • The content was relevant to my needs
  • The pace was appropriate
  • The materials or handouts were useful
  • The venue or format worked well
  • I had enough opportunity to ask questions or participate
Columns: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
Opinion ScaleRequired

How likely are you to recommend this activity to a colleague?

Scale: 0 – 10
Min:Not at all likelyMax:Extremely likely
Q06
Multiple Choice

Which single part of the session did you find most valuable?

  • Opening presentation
  • Group exercise
  • Q&A/discussion
  • Hands-on activity
Q07
Ranking

Please rank these aspects of the session from most to least important for improving future sessions.

  1. Content or curriculum
  2. Facilitator delivery
  3. Pacing and length
  4. Venue and logistics
  5. Materials and handouts
  6. Opportunities for interaction
Drag to rank
Q08
AI Interview

Reconstruct the specific moment or activity that most shaped the respondent's recommendation score: what happened, what they were thinking or feeling, and why it mattered. If the score was very high (9-10), probe what made it a standout so it can be repeated. If it was low (0-6), probe exactly where the session lost them and what single change would have raised the score. Push past generic praise or complaints to a concrete example.

Q09
Long Text

What is one thing we could change to make this activity more valuable next time?

Q10
Multiple Choice

Which department or team are you part of?

  • Engineering
  • Sales
  • Operations
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
Multiple Choice

How many similar activities or sessions have you attended in the past 12 months?

  • This was my first
  • 2-3
  • 4-6
  • 7 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Message

That's everything — thank you for your feedback! Your responses will be combined with others to shape how we run these activities going forward.

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

How it compares

We reviewed the closest templates from other survey tools. Here’s what they do well — and where this template goes further.

Why this template

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment behind each recommendation score, so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat
  • Combines structured metrics (facilitator rating, agreement matrix, ranking of aspects to improve) with open-ended probing in a single flow
  • Includes attendance and repeat-attendance filters (participation level, sessions attended in past 12 months) alongside department segmentation for cross-cutting analysis
  • Auto-generates a report from responses, with transparent prompts showing how the AI follow-up was conducted — no manual theme-coding required

Jotform

Activity Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, fielding-ready form template for collecting feedback on activities, workshops, or events. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, so it's easy to customize fields and branding. However, it's a static form with no adaptive questioning or built-in analysis layer.

What it does well

  • Fielding-ready template, not just a guide
  • Easy visual customization via Jotform's form builder
  • Likely supports standard field types (ratings, multiple choice, text) common to Jotform templates

Where it falls short

  • Static form with fixed questions — no adaptive AI follow-up that probes the reasoning behind a score
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

Typeform

Activity Evaluation Form Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time template for gathering activity or event feedback, consistent with Typeform's polished UX. It's a deployable template rather than a guide, well-suited to simple satisfaction and rating questions. It lacks any mechanism to dynamically dig deeper into a specific respondent's answer.

What it does well

  • Clean, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Fielding-ready and easy to brand/customize
  • Good for quick, low-friction feedback collection

Where it falls short

  • No adaptive AI interviewing — follow-up logic is limited to simple branching, not open-ended probing of a specific moment
  • No voice AI interview or guided task/screen-share capability
  • No automated quality scoring of responses or auto-generated report synthesizing themes

Frequently asked questions

What questions are in the “Activity & Session Evaluation Survey” template?

The template includes 11 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “How much of the session did you take part in?” · “Overall, how would you rate this activity?” · “How would you rate the facilitator(s) or instructor(s) who led the session?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.

How long does this survey take to complete?

Respondents typically finish the 11 questions in about 7 minutes.

Can I customize this template?

Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.

Is this template free to use?

Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Use this templateStart free

Related templates

More studies on similar topics.

See all
Industry-Specific

The Proust Questionnaire: Team Personality Profile

A modernized version of the classic Proust Questionnaire — used by media teams, HR and culture leads, and creative agencies to build candid personality profiles for onboarding pages, podcast intros, or team retrospectives. Closed questions capture the classic prompts verbatim; the AI follow-up interview digs into whichever answer sounds most emotionally loaded to surface the real story behind it.

View template
Industry-Specific

Program and Session Participant Feedback Survey

Captures how participants experienced a workshop, training, or program — satisfaction, perceived value of specific sessions, and likelihood to return — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their ratings so organizers know exactly what to keep, fix, or cut next time.

View template
Industry-Specific

Post-Workshop Feedback and Facilitator Effectiveness Survey

Captures how attendees rate a workshop's content, pacing, and facilitator right after it ends, plus how likely they are to recommend it — for training teams and event organizers. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment that shaped each person's recommendation score, going beyond star ratings to what actually landed or fell flat.

View template
Industry-Specific

Seminar & Conference Session Evaluation Survey

Captures how attendees experienced a seminar or conference session — content quality, speaker delivery, logistics, and likelihood to return — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment satisfaction rose or fell instead of settling for a generic rating. Built for event organizers, training teams, and association program committees.

View template
Industry-Specific

Conference Session and Speaker Feedback Survey

Captures attendee reactions to a specific session — content depth, speaker delivery, relevance to their work, and preferred formats going forward — with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment that shaped their overall rating instead of a generic thumbs up or down.

View template
Industry-Specific

Conference Evaluation & Attendee Experience Survey

Captures how attendees rated sessions, speakers, networking, and logistics, plus their likelihood to return or recommend — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the single moment or gap that most shaped their overall verdict. Built for event and community teams planning next year's agenda and budget.

View template