All templates
AI & Technology

AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey

Measures how ML/AI practitioners engage with model cards, evaluate documented limitations, and how documentation quality shapes trust and adoption decisions across deployment contexts.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

28 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome! This survey explores your experience with model cards and how model limitations influence your workflow. Your participation is voluntary — you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are anonymous and will be reported in aggregate only. Estimated time: 8–10 minutes.

Q02
Multiple Choice

In the past 6 months, how have you worked with ML models? Select all that apply.

  • Implemented or fine-tuned models in code
  • Consumed prebuilt APIs/SDKs
  • Evaluated model performance for a project
  • Selected vendors or models for deployment
  • Wrote or maintained documentation
  • None of the above
Q03
Multiple Choice

How familiar are you with model cards?

  • Very familiar — I regularly read and apply them
  • Somewhat familiar — I've read a few
  • I've heard of model cards but I'm not sure what they include
  • Not familiar — I've never heard of them
Q04
Opinion Scale

If a model card is available, how likely are you to read it before using the model?

Scale: 17
Min:Very unlikelyMax:Very likely
Q05
Opinion Scale

In model cards you've used, how easy was it to locate limitations and failure modes?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q06
Multiple Choice

When limitations are unclear or missing, what do you typically do? Select all that apply.

  • Run targeted tests or benchmarks
  • Search issues/forums or community reports
  • Contact provider or open a ticket
  • Read source paper or repository docs
  • Switch to a different model
  • Proceed with extra monitoring/guardrails
  • Defer or block the integration
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
Long Text

Based on your responses in this survey, do you have any suggestions to make model cards clearer or more actionable?

Q08
Dropdown

What is your primary role?

  • Backend/Full-stack Engineer
  • ML/AI Engineer
  • Data Scientist/Analyst
  • Researcher
  • Product Manager
  • SRE/DevOps
  • Security/Privacy Engineer
  • Technical Writer
  • Student
  • Other
Q09
Message

Thank you for your time! Your feedback will help improve how model cards communicate limitations and support better integration decisions.

Q10
Multiple Choice

Based on what you currently know, which information would you expect to find in a model card? Select all that apply.

  • Intended use and out-of-scope uses
  • Training data sources and collection methods
  • Evaluation metrics and methodology
  • Performance across subgroups or conditions
  • Known limitations and failure modes
  • Safety/ethics considerations
  • Versioning and change history
  • Licensing and usage terms
  • Contact/support information
  • Deployment requirements and constraints
  • I don't know / not sure
  • Other (please specify)
Q11
Multiple Choice

From the model cards you've reviewed, which elements were commonly included? Select all that apply.

  • Intended use and out-of-scope uses
  • Training data sources and collection methods
  • Evaluation metrics and methodology
  • Performance across subgroups or conditions
  • Known limitations and failure modes
  • Safety/ethics considerations
  • Versioning and change history
  • Licensing and usage terms
  • Contact/support information
  • Deployment requirements and constraints
Q12
Opinion Scale

In general, how easy do you think it would be to find a model's limitations in a typical model card?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q13
Multiple Choice

Which format would make model limitations most actionable for you?

  • One-page summary with key facts
  • Table with metrics by subgroup
  • Risk checklist with mitigations
  • Traffic-light risk labeling
  • Interactive examples and failure cases
  • Link to detailed paper/appendix
  • Other (please specify)
Q14
AI Interview

We'd like to explore your experiences with model cards a bit further. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q15
Dropdown

How many years have you worked professionally with ML/AI (in any capacity)?

  • 0–1
  • 2–4
  • 5–7
  • 8–10
  • 11+
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
Message

Quick primer: A model card is a concise report that outlines a model's intended and out-of-scope uses, data provenance, evaluation methods and results (often across subgroups), known limitations and failure modes, and relevant safety/ethical notes. It helps you judge fit and risks before integrating a model. Please keep this definition in mind for the remaining questions.

Q17
Multiple Choice

In the past 3 months, how often did you consult model documentation when integrating models?

  • Every integration
  • Most integrations
  • Sometimes
  • Rarely
  • Never
  • Not applicable — I haven't integrated models recently
Q18
Opinion Scale

How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a safety-critical deployment (e.g., healthcare, autonomous systems)?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q19
Opinion Scale

Overall, how much do you trust model cards to accurately represent a model's capabilities and limitations?

Scale: 17
Min:Do not trust at allMax:Trust completely
Q20
Dropdown

What is your organization's approximate size (total employees)?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001+
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
Opinion Scale

How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a fairness-sensitive application (e.g., hiring, credit scoring)?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q22
Dropdown

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Middle East
  • North America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
Opinion Scale

How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a latency-sensitive production system (e.g., real-time inference)?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q24
Multiple Choice

Which programming languages do you primarily use when working with ML models? Select all that apply.

  • Python
  • JavaScript/TypeScript
  • Java
  • C/C++
  • Go
  • Rust
  • R
  • Swift/Kotlin
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
Multiple Choice

Have you ever discovered a model limitation that was not documented in its model card?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure
Q26
Dropdown

Which industry best describes your work context?

  • Technology
  • Finance
  • Healthcare
  • Retail/E-commerce
  • Media/Entertainment
  • Education
  • Government/Nonprofit
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q27
Long Text

Please briefly describe the undocumented limitation and how you identified it.

Q28
Ranking

Rank the following limitation factors from most to least important when selecting a model.

  1. Accuracy on out-of-distribution data
  2. Biased outcomes for specific subgroups
  3. Privacy or data leakage risk
  4. Robustness to adversarial or prompt attacks
  5. Interpretability/traceability gaps
Drag to rank

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
AI & Technology

AI Governance & Risk Controls Readiness Assessment

Measures organizational readiness across AI policy clarity, approval workflows, risk tiering, and control maturity. Designed for cross-functional teams involved in AI development, deployment, or oversight.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Feature Adoption & Value Perception Survey

Measures user interest, perceived value, adoption barriers, and willingness to pay for AI-powered product features. Designed for SaaS product teams prioritizing their AI roadmap based on user feedback.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Disclosure & Transparency Expectations Survey

Measures consumer expectations for AI transparency across products and services, capturing preferred disclosure methods, acceptability thresholds, and trust drivers to inform product labeling and policy decisions.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Agent Autonomy, Escalation & Control Preferences Survey

Measures user expectations for AI agent autonomy, preferred escalation and handoff mechanisms, permissible actions, spending thresholds, and risk concerns. Designed for UX researchers and product teams building agentic AI workflows.

View template
AI & Technology

Doctor Appointment Chatbot Experience Survey

Measures how well an AI scheduling chatbot helps patients book, reschedule, or get answers about medical appointments, covering task completion, trust, and friction points — with an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment the chatbot helped or failed.

View template
AI & Technology

AI Adoption in Higher Education

A research survey exploring how faculty and students adopt, perceive, and experience AI tools in higher education settings. Covers current usage patterns, perceived benefits and barriers, institutional policy awareness, training needs, and impact on teaching and learning outcomes.

View template