AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey
Measures how ML/AI practitioners engage with model cards, evaluate documented limitations, and how documentation quality shapes trust and adoption decisions across deployment contexts.
Sample questions
A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.
In the past 6 months, how have you worked with ML models? Select all that apply.
- Implemented or fine-tuned models in code
- Consumed prebuilt APIs/SDKs
- Evaluated model performance for a project
- Selected vendors or models for deployment
- Wrote or maintained documentation
- None of the above
How familiar are you with model cards?
- Very familiar — I regularly read and apply them
- Somewhat familiar — I've read a few
- I've heard of model cards but I'm not sure what they include
- Not familiar — I've never heard of them
If a model card is available, how likely are you to read it before using the model?
In model cards you've used, how easy was it to locate limitations and failure modes?
When limitations are unclear or missing, what do you typically do? Select all that apply.
- Run targeted tests or benchmarks
- Search issues/forums or community reports
- Contact provider or open a ticket
- Read source paper or repository docs
- Switch to a different model
- Proceed with extra monitoring/guardrails
- Defer or block the integration
- Other (please specify)
Based on your responses in this survey, do you have any suggestions to make model cards clearer or more actionable?
What is your primary role?
- Backend/Full-stack Engineer
- ML/AI Engineer
- Data Scientist/Analyst
- Researcher
- Product Manager
- SRE/DevOps
- Security/Privacy Engineer
- Technical Writer
- Student
- Other
Thank you for your time! Your feedback will help improve how model cards communicate limitations and support better integration decisions.
Based on what you currently know, which information would you expect to find in a model card? Select all that apply.
- Intended use and out-of-scope uses
- Training data sources and collection methods
- Evaluation metrics and methodology
- Performance across subgroups or conditions
- Known limitations and failure modes
- Safety/ethics considerations
- Versioning and change history
- Licensing and usage terms
- Contact/support information
- Deployment requirements and constraints
- I don't know / not sure
- Other (please specify)
From the model cards you've reviewed, which elements were commonly included? Select all that apply.
- Intended use and out-of-scope uses
- Training data sources and collection methods
- Evaluation metrics and methodology
- Performance across subgroups or conditions
- Known limitations and failure modes
- Safety/ethics considerations
- Versioning and change history
- Licensing and usage terms
- Contact/support information
- Deployment requirements and constraints
In general, how easy do you think it would be to find a model's limitations in a typical model card?
Which format would make model limitations most actionable for you?
- One-page summary with key facts
- Table with metrics by subgroup
- Risk checklist with mitigations
- Traffic-light risk labeling
- Interactive examples and failure cases
- Link to detailed paper/appendix
- Other (please specify)
We'd like to explore your experiences with model cards a bit further. Our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
How many years have you worked professionally with ML/AI (in any capacity)?
- 0–1
- 2–4
- 5–7
- 8–10
- 11+
- Prefer not to say
Quick primer: A model card is a concise report that outlines a model's intended and out-of-scope uses, data provenance, evaluation methods and results (often across subgroups), known limitations and failure modes, and relevant safety/ethical notes. It helps you judge fit and risks before integrating a model. Please keep this definition in mind for the remaining questions.
In the past 3 months, how often did you consult model documentation when integrating models?
- Every integration
- Most integrations
- Sometimes
- Rarely
- Never
- Not applicable — I haven't integrated models recently
How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a safety-critical deployment (e.g., healthcare, autonomous systems)?
Overall, how much do you trust model cards to accurately represent a model's capabilities and limitations?
What is your organization's approximate size (total employees)?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001+
- Prefer not to say
How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a fairness-sensitive application (e.g., hiring, credit scoring)?
Which region are you primarily based in?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How confident are you in using a model card to judge a model's suitability for a latency-sensitive production system (e.g., real-time inference)?
Which programming languages do you primarily use when working with ML models? Select all that apply.
- Python
- JavaScript/TypeScript
- Java
- C/C++
- Go
- Rust
- R
- Swift/Kotlin
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Have you ever discovered a model limitation that was not documented in its model card?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
Which industry best describes your work context?
- Technology
- Finance
- Healthcare
- Retail/E-commerce
- Media/Entertainment
- Education
- Government/Nonprofit
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Please briefly describe the undocumented limitation and how you identified it.
Rank the following limitation factors from most to least important when selecting a model.
- Accuracy on out-of-distribution data
- Biased outcomes for specific subgroups
- Privacy or data leakage risk
- Robustness to adversarial or prompt attacks
- Interpretability/traceability gaps
What’s included
AI follow-ups
Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.
Attention checks
Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.
AI-drafted copy
Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.
Auto report
Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.
Frequently asked questions
What questions are in the “AI Model Card Usability & Developer Trust Survey” template?
The template includes 28 ready-to-use questions, starting with: “Welcome! This survey explores your experience with model cards and how model limitations influence your workflow. Your…” · “In the past 6 months, how have you worked with ML models? Select all that apply.” · “How familiar are you with model cards?”. The full set is previewed above, and every question is editable.
How long does this survey take to complete?
Respondents typically finish the 28 questions in about 12 minutes.
Can I customize this template?
Yes — every question, answer option, and the ordering is editable before you launch. You can add or remove questions, or ask the AI editor to rework the survey around your research goal.
Is this template free to use?
Yes. Open it in the editor and start customizing right away — no account required to try it, and the free plan covers launching your survey.
Ready to launch?
Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.
Related templates
More studies on similar topics.
AI Governance & Risk Controls Readiness Assessment
Measures organizational readiness across AI policy clarity, approval workflows, risk tiering, and control maturity. Designed for cross-functional teams involved in AI development, deployment, or oversight.
View templateAI-Assisted Feature Adoption & Trust Survey
Measures user adoption, satisfaction, trust, and pain points with AI-assisted product features. Use it to capture actionable feedback that informs product roadmap and feature prioritization decisions.
View templateAI Transparency, Control & Recourse Assessment
Measures user attitudes toward AI transparency, desired controls, and recourse expectations. Designed for product teams assessing trust gaps and prioritizing AI governance improvements.
View templateOn-Device AI Training: Consumer Trust & Privacy Perceptions
Measures consumer awareness, trust, privacy concerns, and adoption intentions regarding on-device AI training. Designed for product, UX, and privacy teams seeking to understand how users perceive and evaluate local AI learning features.
View templateAI Tool Adoption in Research Teams
A survey studying how research teams evaluate, adopt, and integrate AI tools for data collection, analysis, and reporting. This instrument measures current tool usage, evaluation criteria, adoption barriers, training experiences, data quality perceptions, and team collaboration patterns.
View templateCreator AI Adoption, Ethics & Disclosure Survey
Measures AI tool adoption rates, usage barriers, quality-speed tradeoffs, and credit/disclosure norms among media creators across disciplines. Suitable for creative industry researchers and platform teams studying the creator-AI relationship.
View template