All templates
Industry-Specific

Aircraft Maintenance Documentation Usability Assessment

Collects structured technician feedback on the clarity, accuracy, accessibility, and timeliness of aerospace maintenance documentation to drive safety and efficiency improvements.

Sample questions

A preview of what’s in the template. Every question is editable before you launch.

27 questions · ~12 min
Q01
Message

Welcome to the Maintenance Documentation Usability Assessment. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes. Your responses will help us identify ways to improve the clarity, accuracy, and accessibility of maintenance documentation. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest experience. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Please answer based on your experience in the last 30 days unless otherwise noted.

Q02
Dropdown

In the last 30 days, how often did you use maintenance documentation?

  • Multiple times per day
  • About once per day
  • A few times per week
  • About once per week
  • Less than weekly
  • Not in the last 30 days
Q03
Opinion Scale

Thinking about the documentation you used most often in the last 30 days, how would you rate its overall clarity of written instructions?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q04
Ranking

Please rank the following potential improvements from most helpful (top) to least helpful (bottom).

  1. Better search and filtering
  2. Clearer figures / step graphics
  3. More cross-references and hyperlinks
  4. Offline access with sync
  5. Standardized tables for specs / torque values
  6. Clear change logs and revision summaries
Drag to rank
Q05
Long Text

Please briefly describe the most recent documentation issue you encountered and how it affected your work, if applicable.

Q06
Dropdown

What is your primary role?

  • Line maintenance technician
  • Base / heavy maintenance technician
  • Avionics specialist
  • Inspector / quality
  • Planner
  • Engineer / tech services
  • Supervisor / manager
  • Other
Q07
Message

Thank you for your time. Your input will directly inform improvements to maintenance documentation usability, clarity, and accessibility across the organization.

Q08
Multiple Choice

Which of the following documentation types did you use in the last 30 days? Select all that apply.

  • Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM)
  • Component Maintenance Manual (CMM)
  • Illustrated Parts Catalog (IPC)
  • Service Bulletins / Airworthiness Directives (SB/AD)
  • Work orders or task cards
  • Wiring diagrams / schematics
  • Troubleshooting guides
  • Digital checklists or job aids
  • Other (please specify)
Q09
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the accuracy of the technical content in the documentation you used most often?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q10
Dropdown

Which format would you most prefer for future maintenance documentation?

  • Structured web pages with hyperlinks
  • Interactive app experience
  • Downloadable PDFs
  • Printed manuals
  • Mixed: web plus printable extracts
Q11
AI Interview

Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your documentation experience in a bit more depth. What is the single biggest way that maintenance documentation could be improved to help you do your job more effectively?

Q12
Dropdown

How many years of experience do you have in aerospace maintenance?

  • 0–1
  • 2–5
  • 6–10
  • 11–20
  • 21+
Q13
Dropdown

What was your primary format for accessing documentation in the last 30 days?

  • OEM web portal
  • Internal MRO system
  • Tablet / EFB app
  • Static PDF files
  • Printed copies
  • Scans / photos of pages
  • Other
Q14
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the completeness of the documentation (e.g., all steps, specs, and references included)?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q15
Multiple Choice

Which certifications or licenses do you currently hold? Select all that apply.

  • A&P
  • EASA Part-66 B1
  • EASA Part-66 B2
  • IA / Authorized Inspector
  • None
  • Other (please specify)
Q16
Multiple Choice

Which tools do you use to access documentation? Select all that apply.

  • Tablet / EFB
  • Desktop / laptop
  • Shop floor kiosk
  • Personal mobile phone
  • Shared binder shelf
  • AR headset / smart glasses
  • Other (please specify)
Q17
Opinion Scale

How would you rate the quality of diagrams, figures, and visual aids in the documentation?

Scale: 17
Min:Very poorMax:Excellent
Q18
Dropdown

What is your primary shift?

  • Day
  • Evening
  • Night
  • Rotating / varies
Q19
Opinion Scale

How easy or difficult was it to locate the correct document within your workflow in the last 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Very difficultMax:Very easy
Q20
Dropdown

In which region do you primarily work?

  • Americas
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • Asia-Pacific
Q21
Opinion Scale

To what extent were documentation updates available in time to support your maintenance tasks in the last 30 days?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all timelyMax:Extremely timely
Q22
Dropdown

What type of organization do you primarily work for?

  • Airline
  • Independent MRO
  • OEM
  • Defense
  • General aviation
  • Other
Q23
Opinion Scale

Overall, how confident are you that the documented procedures you follow are accurate?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q24
Opinion Scale

Overall, how confident are you that following the documented procedures keeps you and your colleagues safe?

Scale: 17
Min:Not at all confidentMax:Extremely confident
Q25
Dropdown

In the last 30 days, approximately how many times did unclear or outdated documentation cause rework, delay, or a work stoppage?

  • 0 times
  • 1–2 times
  • 3–5 times
  • 6–10 times
  • 11 or more times
Q26
Dropdown

In the last 30 days, approximately how many minutes per typical shift did you spend searching for or clarifying documentation?

  • 0 minutes
  • 1–5 minutes
  • 6–15 minutes
  • 16–30 minutes
  • 31–60 minutes
  • More than 60 minutes
Q27
Opinion Scale

If you reported a documentation error or issue in the last 30 days, how would you rate the speed of resolution?

Scale: 17
Min:Extremely slowMax:Extremely fast

What’s included

  • AI follow-ups

    Adaptive probes on open-ended answers that pull out detail a static form would miss.

  • Attention checks

    Built-in safeguards against rushed answers and low-quality respondents.

  • AI-drafted copy

    Wording, ordering, and branching written by the AI — tuned to your research goal.

  • Auto report

    Themes, quotes, and a plain-English summary write themselves once responses come in.

Ready to launch?

Open this template in the editor. Every part is yours to change before the first respondent sees it.

Related templates

More studies from the same category.

See all
Industry-Specific

Graduation Party Invitation & Guest Planning Survey

Helps hosts plan a graduation party guests actually want to attend by measuring interest, preferred format, timing, and must-have elements — with an AI follow-up that digs into what would tip a hesitant guest into a confident yes.

View template
Industry-Specific

Online Football Quiz Experience & Engagement Survey

Captures how players rate the difficulty, fairness, and fun of your online football trivia quiz, which topics they want more of, and how likely they are to return, recommend, or pay for premium content. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific question or moment that shaped their score, revealing what to fix or double down on.

View template
Industry-Specific

New Client Onboarding & Information Intake Survey

Captures the essential background, goals, and priorities of a new client before an engagement begins — company profile, decision context, and success criteria — with an AI follow-up that digs into the real business problem behind their stated goals so your team starts the relationship with clarity instead of assumptions.

View template
Industry-Specific

Employee Work Satisfaction Pulse Survey

Tracks how satisfied employees are with their job, manager, and growth path, and flags flight risk before it shows up in attrition data. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reason behind each person's lowest-rated area instead of leaving it as an unexplained number.

View template
Industry-Specific

Personal Sense of Meaning and Purpose Survey

Explores where people currently find meaning, how they prioritize competing life domains, and how well daily life matches what they say matters most — with an AI follow-up that digs into the story behind their strongest and weakest sources of purpose. Useful for researchers, coaches, or wellbeing programs studying purpose and life satisfaction.

View template
Industry-Specific

Non-Profit Donation Request Response Survey

Measures how supporters responded to a specific fundraising appeal — whether they gave, what almost stopped them, and which parts of the ask felt trustworthy or confusing. Built for development and communications teams testing a letter, email, or campaign, with an AI follow-up that surfaces the real reasoning behind the give/no-give decision.

View template